Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

1458 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discussion on plato

At first glance, it would seem that Plato’s ideal polis is built upon a great contradiction. In the Republic, Plato repeatedly espouses the virtues of truth and of continuously searching for the truth. In fact, the words ‘true’ and ‘truth’ are written over 900 times in the Republic. At the same time, however, Plato mentions several different falsehoods that would be of vital importance to the polis. In fact, he sets out guidelines as to who in the polis can and cannot lie. In the words of classical scholars Smith and Brickhouse, “Plato has created a paradox of the first order." (Brickhouse, Smith, 1983) Plato’s apparent doublethink with regards to the importance of truth in the polis is quite troubling and scholars have long sought to reconcile …show more content…

Plato explains his theory with his famous Allegory of the Cave. In this parable, Plato imagines “men dwelling in a sort of subterranean cavern with a long entrance open to the light on its entire width… they remain in the same spot, able to look forward only, and prevented by fetters from turning their head. Picture further the light from a fire burning higher up and at a distance behind them, and between the fire and the prisoners and above them a road along which a low wall has been built, as the exhibitors of puppet-shows have partitions before the men themselves, above which they show the puppets.” (514a-b) These prisoners know no other reality and thus believe that the shadows of the puppets are all that exist. Plato continues to explain that if one of these men were able to break free of their fetters and leave the cave, they would see the world for how it truly is. Plato uses this parable to explain our universe. Humans are compared to the chained prisoners, while the shadows are compared to physical objects we can recognize through our senses. The prisoner who is able to break free and see the truth of the outside world is analogous to the philosopher who can understand the true Forms, or eidos in ancient Greek, of these physical objects that exist in a non-physical realm he terms the intelligible realm. Thus, Plato’s purpose in the Republic is creating a polis as close to the elusive Forms of justice and good as

Show More
Related

  • Formation of Real Truth: Plato's Allegory of the Cave and Shakespeare's Othello

    1063 Words  | 3 Pages

    False truth is given by a manipulator and tries to keep the “prisoners” in the cave as a part of the process to finding real truth. Plato states it very clear the manipulators as the people who control the shadows that reflect false truth. This manipulator can be one’s self or a person who is externally manipulating you. Plato references these manipulators as puppeteers through this statement:”Imagine that along this path a low wall has been built, like the screen front of puppeteers above which they show their puppets.” (Plato). This is one part of the formation of the truth as being manipulated by ...

    Read More

  • How Does Plato Use Ethos In The Allegory Of The Cave

    387 Words  | 1 Pages

    The first pillar we come across is Logos. Plato demonstrates his appeal to logic from the start with a series of metaphorical questions. During this created dialogue his questions strengthen the idea that the prisoners who have only seen the shadows will believe them to be the real objects. This is a metaphor for societies, and the common thought that people only believe what they can see. That they tend to be closed minded and slow moving when it comes to new ideas. So plato gives them a way so they can understand

    Read More

  • Democracy Outlined by Plato and Aristotle

    920 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plato defines Athens as a democratic society that “treats all men as equal, whether they are equal or not.” Therefore, believes that there are those that are born to rule and others that are born to be ruled. Plato presents the argument that democracy does not achieve the greatest good, giving four main objections to democracy. Firstly, he identifies that most of us are ruled by passions, pleasure, sentiment and impulse. Hence, th...

    Read More

  • Plato Vs. Epicacetus: The Philosophies Of Plato And Epictetus

    1495 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the main points of Plato’s philosophy was that he believed that people should not so easily trust their senses. In “The Allegory of the Cave”, Plato argues that what we perceive of the world through our sense does not give us the entire picture of what is really there. He states that what we can see is only shadows of what is true, but since we are born believing what we see, we don’t know that there is anything missing at all. Plato believed that in the “knowable realm”, the form of the good, the ultimate truth, is the last thing that we can see, which requires more effort that simply perceiving it. This ultimate truth can only be found through being able to not only perceive, but to be dragged out of the cave, or to be able to think. He likely believed this because through education, he felt that there was an ordering occurring in the mind that allowed for thoughts to become more focused, and clearer. As these thoughts became clearer, s...

    Read More

  • Thrasymachus and Socrates

    771 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Plato’s The Republic, we, the readers, are presented with two characters that have opposing views on a simple, yet elusive question: what is justice? In this paper, I will explain Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, as well as Socrates’s rebuttals and differences in opinion. In addition, I will comment on the different arguments made by both Socrates and Thrasymachus, and offer critical commentary and examples to illustrate my agreement or disagreement with the particular argument at hand.

    Read More

  • Plato’s Allegory of the Cave and The Matrix

    2260 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Republic is considered to be one of Plato’s most storied legacies. Plato recorded many different philosophical ideals in his writings. Addressing a wide variety of topics from justice in book one, to knowledge, enlightenment, and the senses as he does in book seven. In his seventh book, when discussing the concept of knowledge, he is virtually addressing the cliché “seeing is believing”, while attempting to validate the roots of our knowledge. By his use of philosophical themes, Plato is able to further his points on enlightenment, knowledge, and education. In this allegory, the depictions of humans as they are chained, their only knowledge of the world is what is seen inside the cave. Plato considers what would happen to people should they embrace the concepts of philosophy, to become enlightened by it, to see things as they truly are. As we have mentioned in class, Plato’s theory did not only present itself in his allegory, but also in the Wachowski brothers’ hit-film, The Matrix. In the film, the protagonist, Neo, suffers from a similar difficulty of adapting to reality, or the truth, which we will see later on. In order to understand Plato’s Allegory of the Cave, one must consider how Plato’s used of symbols to explain what true knowledge (or enlightenment) really is along the comparisons to the Wachowski brothers’ film, The Matrix.

    Read More

  • Plato's Noble Falsehood

    1675 Words  | 4 Pages

    Even today, Noble falsehood is a popular topic. On one hand, people are keen to talk how politicians use those well-intentional lies to achieve some incredible things. On the other hand, people accuse those politicians of divesting people’s right of choice making and intentionally hiding the truth. It seems that people have an alternative feeling towards falsehood. Thus, this essay is aim to discuss why and how in some cases falsehood is such a useful thing in politics, whereas in the others it is a contradiction in Plato’s political project.

    Read More

  • The Republic Book 1

    1661 Words  | 4 Pages

    Book 1 of Plato's Republic raises the question what is justice? Four views of justice are examined. The first is that justice is speaking the truth and paying one's debt. The second is that justice is helping one's friends and harming one's enemies. The third view of justice is that it is to the advantage of the stronger. The last view is that injustice is more profitable than justice.

    Read More

  • Plato's Response to Thrasymachus' Immoralist View of Justice

    1494 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Book 1 of the ‘Republic’, Socrates, in answer to the question ‘What is Justice?’ is presented with a real and dangerous alternative to what he thinks to be the truth about Justice. Julia Annas believes Thrasymachus thinks Justice and Injustice do have a real existence that is independent of human institutions; and that Thrasymachus makes a decided commitment to Injustice. She calls this view ‘Immoralism’: “the immoralist holds that there is an important question about justice, to be answered by showing that injustice is better.” This essay identifies this ‘Immoral’ view before understanding if and how Plato can respond to it. How does Plato attempt to refute Thrasymachus’s argument? Is he successful?

    Read More

  • Criticism In Plato's The Allegory Of The Cave

    1206 Words  | 3 Pages

    Plato begins the dialogue by describing the cave and the people to which he is referring. The cave is underneath the ground where a small fire is the main light source. The prisoners, who are shackled by their arms and legs, are sitting in front of the fire facing a wall. Above them there is a walkway connecting with a low wall, resembling a puppeteer’s stage. On this walkway people are carrying monuments and statues to make

    Read More

  • Plato's Republic: The Myth Of The Metals

    1618 Words  | 4 Pages

    Plato’s Republic provides a detailed image of absolute truth about justice and morality through the lense of Socrates’ dialogue with his fellow companions. The Myth of the Metals is introduced in book four and defined as a “noble falsehood” (Grube 58) but earlier Socrates proclaims that “to be false to one’s soul about the things that are, to be ignorant and to have and hold a falsehood there, is what everyone would least of all accept, for everyone hates a falsehood in that place most of all” (Grube 58). There seems to be a conflict between Plato’s myth and his opinion on falsehoods but that is actually not the case. Plato’s Myth of the Metals does not contradict with his statement on falsehoods; instead brings forth a more complete picture of Plato’s theory of justice and molds his ideal of the perfect society.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Plato's Allegory of the Cave

    983 Words  | 2 Pages

    The flaw that Plato speaks about is trusting as real, what one sees - believing absolutely that what one sees is true. In The Allegory of the Cave, the slaves in the caves know that the shadows, thrown on the wall by the fire behind them, are real. If they were to talk to the shadows echoes would make the shadows appear to talk back. To the slaves "the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images." (Jacobus 316).

    Read More

  • Comparing Aristotle and Plato

    791 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Republic is the most important dialogue within Plato's teaching of politics. It deals with the soul, which, as we know from the beginning, at the level where one must make choices and decide what one wants to become in this life, and it describes justice as the ultimate form of human, and the ideal one should strive for both in life and in state. Justice as understood by Plato is not merely a social virtue, having only to do with relationship between people, but virtue that makes it possible for one to build their own regime and reach happiness.

    Read More

  • The statesman

    1005 Words  | 3 Pages

    The concept of written laws and their place in government is one of the key points of discussion in the Platonic dialog the Statesman. In this philosophical work, a dialog on the nature of the statesmanship is discussed in order to determine what it is that defines the true statesman from all of those who may lay claim to this title. This dialog employs different methods of dialectic as Plato begins to depart from the Socratic method of argumentation. In this dialog Socrates is replaced as the leader of the discussion by the stranger who engages the young Socrates in a discussion about the statesman. Among the different argumentative methods that are used by Plato in this dialog division and myth play a central role in the development of the arguments put forth by the stranger as he leads the young Socrates along the dialectic path toward the nature of the statesman. The statesman is compared to a shepherd or caretaker of the human “flock.” The conclusion that comes from division says that the statesman is one who: Issues commands (with a science) of his own intellect over the human race. This is the first conclusion that the dialog arrives at via the method of division. The dialog, however, does not end here as the stranger suggests that their definition is still wanting of clarity because there are still some (physicians, farmers, merchants, etc…) who would lay claim to the title of shepherds of humanity. For this reason a new approach to the argument must be undertaken: “then we must begin by a new starting-point and travel by a different road” (Statesman 268 D.)

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    1440 Words  | 3 Pages

    In Plato’s Republic, the main argument is dedicated to answering Glaucon and Adeimantus, who question the reason for just behavior. They argue it is against one’s self-interest to be just, but Plato believes the behavior is in fact in one’s self-interest because justice is inherently good. Plato tries to prove this through his depiction of an ideal city, which he builds from the ground up, and ultimately concludes that justice requires the philosopher to perform the task of ruling. Since the overall argument is that justice pays, it follows that it would be in the philosopher’s self-interest to rule – however, Plato also states that whenever people with political power believe they benefit from ruling, a good government is impossible. Thus, those who rule regard the task of ruling as not in their self-interest, but something intrinsically evil. This is where Plato’s argument that justice is in one’s self-interest is disturbed. This paper will discuss the idea that justice is not in one’s self-interest, and thus does not pay.

    Read More

More about Plato's Allegory Of The Cave

Open Document