Physical Security Codes

1100 Words3 Pages

According to Jan Goldman, the author of "Physical Security Codes." Physical security is a social obligation for the operation of a cultural organization, for the physical safety of its staff, for the maintenance of peace for public visitors, and for the maintenance of public appearances and reputation that encourages donations, continued government funding, and self-assurance in that institution's executive and management. The supervisor of Metropolitan museum of art should require that certain physical security policies and procedures be required of all property and building users. The director of security usually suggests and drafts these policies and procedures; staffs them through such institution offices as management, and union representatives; …show more content…

It requires generous amount of time to protect the art pieces and make it difficult to steal or damage. We found someone with experience in all three: Thomas P. Campbell, Director and CEO of The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Thomas to show us how he'd secure a priceless painting if money were no object. The security program he designed is comprehensive; it not only protects the work itself, but also the room it hangs in and the museum as a whole. His institution wants to provide the safest facility for visitors and workers possible. This institution wants to know when any illegal, violent, abusive or threatening behavior occurs on our premises in order to take action to prevent injury, damage, or interruption of operation, and prevention of another occurrence. The museum does not tolerate any unauthorized person to carry firearms, deadly weapons, or clearly dangerous materials on our premises, in accordance with local laws, and posts its property and facilities accordingly. Gail B. Stewart suggested in Lucent Library of Homeland Security. Defending the Borders (pp. 58-70), the museum intends to detain and turn over to police authorities any visitors or staff who break major criminal laws or who display a serious or immediate threat to themselves or …show more content…

The institute requires each hiring staff to carefully review applications and interview and select persons for work on the premises who do not have a record or personal habit of demonstrating a preference for illegal, violent, abusive, or threatening behavior. The establishment requires interviewing and hiring staff to contact prior employers to verify work history and inquire about the applicant's performance and conduct, documenting the information in the applicant's record. This screening is most important for those who work with public visitors or with children, in work involving potentially dangerous equipment, and in situations of high stress. The foundation requires supervisors to closely monitor the behavior of newly hired staff during their initial term of probation to determine their suitability during this trial period of work, providing counseling where required and taking action before the end of the probationary period to dismiss staff who have a high potential for illegal, violent, abusive, or threatening

Open Document