Philemona Williamson And Burchfield Analysis

489 Words1 Page

Philemona Williamson and Charles Burchfield are two well-known artists from around the New York region. Creating art is what they both find great passion in. If one were to hold a piece by each artist side by side, at first glance, they are almost complete opposites. However, when going more in depth, there are similarities. Philemona and Burchfield had different and similar reasons for why they created artwork, how they created artwork, and what their artwork consisted of.
The reasons why an artist creates their work are few and far between. In the case of Philemona Williamson and Charles Burchfield, the reasons between the two were different. Philemona based her artwork on her childhood memories, specifically her adolescence stage because she felt that was a very critical time in life. Her artwork told a story equivalent to a metaphorical narrative. On the other hand, Charles Burchfield based his artwork on weather and showed emotion. A lot of his work captured the weather, sky, sound, and scenery surrounding Lake Erie. Equally, Philemona and Charles both created artwork that held great meaning to them. Both referenced back to a specific starting point, Philemona had an inspirational wall to refer to while Burchfield had a diary of events. …show more content…

There is no right or wrong way to create art. Philemona Williamson preferred oil painting on a canvas. The oil paintings included bright, vivid colors like pink, yellow, green, and more. Additionally, Philemona had a limited amount of space to do artwork on and everything always appeared as if it was being pushed off the edge. In contrast, Burchfield mostly did watercolor and sketches on paper. While he did incorporate some color, the colors were very neutral. Unlike how Philemona had a limited amount of space for her work, Burchfield continued to add paper until he finished. The two created their artwork based on memory and how they remembered the

Open Document