Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bad effect of pesticides
S.a. of chemical pesticides and fertilizer
Bad effect of pesticides
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bad effect of pesticides
SPCM 1040 – Clare Proctor - FINAL FULL OUTLINE
Speeches 5-8 minutes, will be delivered at the last session
Judith Serwaah Agyenim-Boateng
Subject/Topic: Pesticides
General Purpose (GP): To persuade
Specific Purpose (SP): At the end of my speech my audience will know about the dire effects of pesticides on the environment will take measures minimize their use.
Central Idea (CI): It is important to know and reduce the effects of pesticides use.
Title: Save your Life! Save the environment! Minimize pesticides!
Organizational Patterns: Problem/ Solution
Introduction
Your Excellency, the Minister of the Environment; Representatives from various farmers associations; Members of the press, and ladies and gentlemen who are gathered
…show more content…
Evidence (statistics): As you will see from the visuals, a scientific study of the results of live births in Minnesota agricultural communities to shows that there is a connection between the use of pesticides and a rise in birth defects. The study analysed families where only the father handled pesticides.
Pesticides: Birth Defects and Other Anomalies
Group Number
Live births 1,532
Family participants 696
Families with children 536
Congenital birth anomalies 70
Autism 2
Childhood Diabetes 3
ADD/ADHD 14
(Garry, Harkins, Erickson, Long-Simpson, Holland & Burroughs, 2002)
Body system of child with Birth Defect No. of cases Children less than one -year old One-year old More than three-year old Confirmed by medical records Adult children who refused examination
Central nervous system 14 7 3 4 11 3
Cardiovascular system 13 8 0 5 10 3
Gastrointestinal system 4 3 0 1 4 0
Urogenital system 9 6 1 2 8 1
Musculoskeletal system 27 17 4 6 17 7
Skin/Integumentary system 4 4 0 0 4 0
Cytogenetic /Metabolic 5 3 0 2 4 1
Total 78 18 8 20 58 15
More than 75% of the respondents reported birth defects that were medically confirmed and five children had more than one birth defect and more than one organ system involved (Garry et al., 2002).
b.
…show more content…
& Trompiz, G. (2016, March 18). France moves toward full ban on pesticides blamed for harming bees [Electronic Version] Reuters.
Agricultural Pesticide Use May Be Associated with Increased Risk of Prostate Cancer. (2004). Journal of Environmental Health, 66(6), 67.
Visuals for Cancer Caused by Pesticide Exposure (n.d) Retrieved from https://www.google.nl/search?q=visuals+for+cancer+caused+by+pesticide+exposure&rlz=1C1VSNA_enGH602GH603&espv=2&biw=1366&bih=653&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiq68Ga6LPMAhVHShQKHZZaDMMQ_AUIBigB Greenpeace International (2016, January 18). Retrieved April 29, 2016, from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/press/releases/2016/Greenpeace-campaign-bears-fruits-Aldi-Sud-bans-bee-harming-pesticides/#
Bailey, A. (2004). Birds by the Window. Biologist, 51(2), 64. Carson R. (2002).Silent Spring. Published by Mariner Books
Trautmann N.M. & Porter K. S. and Robert J. Wagenet R. J (2012). Cornell University
(“Residents Measure Pesticides in Minnesota Air”, n.d) Retreived from http://www.panna.org/press-release/residents-measure-pesticides-minnesota-air Sampaio,M.V., Bueno,V.H.P.,Silveira,L.C.P., Auad ,A.M.(n.d)TROPIC BIOLOGY AND CONSEVATION MANAGEMENT, Vol.III-Biological Control of Pest in the
The premise of Theo Colborns’ research was to find the connection between the rising incidences of cancer and environmental contamination in the Great Lakes region. However, during field and laboratory studies, Colborn discovered that there was no direct link between the contamination and cancer. However, Colborn did find reoccurring patterns of abnormal behavior and deformed offspring amongst the wildlife populations in the Great Lakes region. Elevated levels of polychlorinated biphenls (PCBs), pesticides dieldrin, DDT, lindane and chlordane were found during tissue analysis of the wildlife in the Great Lakes region (Colborn et. Al 1996). These elevated levels were found in offspring of the wildlife who appeared to be healthy. This supported Colborns’ hypothesis that these contaminations disrupt hormones produced by the endocrine system during growth and development, which will then cause physical and behavioral abnormalities in the fetus.
Carson writes with meticulous detail with almost all of her scientific facts and explanations. She compels her readers with keywords and phrases to gravitate her audience towards her side of the argument. Carson gives an example explaining that “in this now universal contamination of the environment, chemicals are the sinister and little-recognized partners of radiation in changing the very nature of the world –the very nature of its life…chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in the soil, entering into living organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death”(43). To begin, Carson skillfully argues her point by describing chemicals as “sinister” which grabs her reader’s attention, and presents her evidence comprehensibly so that her variety of readers feel well informed, rather than stunned and confused. Carson could have simply stated that chemicals can transfer from soil to living creatures and save time without disclosure; however, she instead reaches the decision to describe the process with powerful, yet understandable vocabulary that provides emotional appeal in her argument. By presenting scientific evidence and explanations in a compelling and sentimental manner, Carson’s audience is able to connect with her argument. Every fact and description that she gives deems useful in her argument that pesticides should not be used for the treatment of
Two essays read by the class, “Fables for Tomorrow” and “The Clan of One-Breasted Women”, target the idea that chemical compounds have an impact on nature. They make it a priority to get their points across that limiting pesticides and chemical compounds will help make America, and other places around the world a better place. They provide very educational messages in getting their points across about the dangerous roles the pesticides play in the world today. Humans and the government cause this through authorization of plenty of the events going on in the environment. Both of the authors, who are female activists for the environment, focus on chemical compounds causing diseases and harm to the environment.
Have you ever thought about how your fruits and vegetables are grown? How about which ingredients are put into bug sprays and insecticides to ward off those pesky insects? Look no further because author Rachel Carson looks deep into the many environmental issues caused by pesticides and herbicides in her New York Times best-selling novel, “Silent Spring.” “Silent Spring” is a collection of studies which were performed in an effort to educate others about the harmful things occurring everyday to their foods and every-day environment in hopes of giving them a wake up call. This novel is thought by many to be a revolutionary novel that forced people to take notice of the harm being caused in their world, many of which people were unaware of. After discovering the results of these chemicals, it really makes one wonder, is the luxury of being insect free really worth all of the consequences?
“Can anyone believe it is possible to lay down such a barrage of poisons on the surface of the earth without making it unfit for all life? They should not be called “insecticides,” but “biocides” (Carson, 2015, p.607). Rachel Carson, a marine biologist and conservationist, writes about modern society’s heedless contamination and destruction of the planet and how it affects humanity in “The Obligation to Endure”. This essay is one of many from her book Silent Spring, which was published in 1962. It is a compelling essay calling for agricultural reform. Carson uses all three appeals of argument to persuade the reader. First, the ethical argument stems from the fact that Carson is an influential author, employed by the government. Carson then uses a logical argument to lay out the facts about the
Evidence provided to support these claims of human and wildlife harm is largely from laboratory studies in which large doses are fed to test animals, usually rats or mice, and field studies of wildlife species that have been exposed to the chemicals mentioned above. In laboratory studies, high doses are required to give weak hormone activity. These doses are not likely to be encountered in the environment. However the process of bioaccumulation can result in top-level predators such as humans to have contaminants at levels many million times greater than the environmental background levels (Guilette 1994). In field studies, toxicity caused by endocrine disruption has been associated with the presence of certain pollutants. Findings from such studies include: reproductive disruption in starfish due to PCBs, bird eggshell thinning due to DDT, reproductive failure in mink, small penises in alligators due to DDT and dicofol (Guillette 1994, Colburn et al 1996). In addition, a variety of reproductive problems in many other species are claimed to be associated with environmental contamination although the specific causative agents have not been determined. One recent discovery that complicates the situation is that there are many naturally occurring "phytoestrogens", or chemicals of plant origin that exhibit weak estrogenic properties.
Her audience is anyone who cares about the world we live in and its long term health. “The world we live in” is a vast category, which includes our entire ecosystem as well as animals and humans. The essay also targets producers and users of chemicals and pesticides used for insect and pest control. In “The Obli...
To help keep crops from being destroyed, conventional farmers use many methods such as pesticides, herbicides, and fungicides. Nearly 1 billion pounds of these chemicals are used every year (“pesticides”). Because of this excessive use, some scientists express concern that using artificial chemicals in the farming process could produce unhealthy crops. People who ate it over a long period of time could suffer from degraded health and stunted growth (“Organic Foods”). For example, in 1989, the EPA banned the use of Alar which was a chemical used to ripen apples (“Farming, Organics”). This chemical proved to be carcinogenic after causing tumors in mice after several laboratory tests (“Organic Food”). As a result of these findings there was a dramatic increase of the sales for organic food (“Organic Food”). Another study found that Atrazine (one of the most widely used herbicides in the United States) has the potential of being carcinogenic and reducing sperm counts in males (“Organic Food”). This was further proven when evidence was found that chemicals u...
II. Transition to Main Point 1: I’m sure you all have heard of organic food but may not know exactly what it is or what makes it organic.
In a study conducted by the University of London’s Centre for Toxicology, 30 out of 37 commonly used pesticides have been tested to block or mimic male hormones (Cone). This blockage can affect testosterone levels negatively as well as other androgens produced within a male’s body causing serious health concerns with fertilization, hair loss, and low sex drive. The study also discovered that certain pesticides that are used within today’s agriculture can, “…activate or inhibit hormone receptors in cells that turn genes on and off” (Cone). Therefore, fetuses and infants can be at high risk when exposed in the womb or through breast milk since the hormones being turned on or off control masculinization of the reproductive tract. Overall, pesticides seem like they are doing more harm to human’s health then they are at keeping crops healthy and should be eliminated from modern agriculture
Pollution is affecting many individuals and life, as we know it. We need to do something about how it’s affecting our world. That’s why I urge the issue that more people should realize that pollution is an issue that needs to be prevented because of its negative consequences. Which are health affects, the total destruction of environments, and the death of animals and plants. More awareness must be brought up amongst the people and they must realize the long-term benefits it has for the world.
I remember when I first thought about the power one person could have to create change. I was a teenager growing up in the South when I read Rachel Carson’s book “Silent Spring”. This beautifully written book is a powerful indictment of the widespread use of pesticides. Rachel Carson criticized the chemical companies for claiming that pesticides were safe despite mounting evidence to the contrary. And she criticized public officials who accepted the chemical industry’s claims.
Pesticides are contaminating the Earth’s water supplies. There are seventeen pesticides found in twenty-three state’s water supplies right now. Scientists at Cornell University conclude that 99% of pesticides miss the intended source and find their way into the water, air and soil. Most of the pollution isn’t strong enough to create an immediate impact on humans so the wildlife is the primary target to these contaminates. Animals such as the European Starling birds are constantly being tested and found that they are greatly affected both behaviorally and psychologically.
Household chemicals were created for a reason, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be harmful to your health. For instance, pesticides used on household lawns are now proven to cause neurological disorders. These include depression, mania, learning disorders, A.D.H.D, immune system defects and memory problems. Not proven yet, but the same chemicals play a big part in leading research for the c...
The pesticide is a controversial topic since farmers are used it to gain their yield. Especially, pesticide is discovered during World War II as a chemical weapon that mixture of multiple chemicals together to kill human. Therefore, Chantries redesign pesticide to kill an organism where and when we don’t want it. Because people want to go to the grocery store to buy the perfect product, pesticide makes it happens and with a little cost for farmers. Nonetheless, pesticide also is the expenditure of life expectancy, which directly threatens people and poses risk of mortality rate. Abusing the pesticide has multiple affects on our society, (Add). (Add thesis)