Persuasive Essay On Solar Energy

863 Words2 Pages

Currently society is structured in a way that makes the people dependent on fossil fuels. The era of technology requires the need for electrical usage, the layout of cities and highways are constructed to force people to travel by vehicles, and the taxation for using cleaner energy sources oppresses those who are environmentally conscious. One of the major problems in funding cleaner energy sources is the capitalistic ideology of America. Instead of funding research for the retrieval of oil from exhausted oil wells, or funding the production and maintenance of oil pipelines, the money instead should go towards finding more sustainable ways to fuel the country and then enabling the public to purchase these techniques through incentives such as tax breaks. Instead of negatively reinforcing the public for the usage of clean energy, provide positive reinforcement for the endurance of the behavior.
All energy comes from the sun. It is the most abundant form of clean, renewable energy. 173,000 terawatts of solar energy strikes the Earth continuously, which is more than 10,000 times the world’s total energy use (Pierce). It does not produce carbon dioxide emissions, it will not deplete, and it is free. The way solar energy works can be demonstrated when one walks outside. The sunlight hits an object, the skin, and the energy turns into heat, which is the warmth that is felt on the skin. The way to harness this energy is when the sunlight hits certain materials, the energy turns into an electrical current instead (Locke). Solar cells are a device that can convert sunlight into electricity. Solar cells have crystals, which are bonds between silicon atoms made of electrons shared between all atoms (Locke). The light gets absorbed and the...

... middle of paper ...

...main argument against oil restoration from exhausted reserves is what will the country do when those supplies are depleted? It is better to switch attention now in order to prepare for a better tomorrow. It would be better not wait until the last minute when there are severely limited choices and severely limited resources. At the current state, costs should be irrelevant to the equation. At this point in time, it is going to cost more money to clean up the chaos than progress to a different form of energy, one that does not further damage the Earth. The combination of new energy sources, plus the sequestration of carbon dioxide, would be ideal. As learned in psychological treatment, combination therapies work better than a single approach. Unfortunately the American ideology hinders and delays such improvements making this an ideal approach to powering the country.

Open Document