My purpose is to write an essay in which I describe the use of personification and irony in "The Pardoner's Tale.". Without Geoffrey Chaucer we probably would not be speaking English, but French as our main language. Geoffrey Chaucer has wrote many amazing stories including The Pardoner's Tale. Geoffrey Chaucer uses personification and irony throughout the story "The Pardoner's Tale.". Throughout the story Death is personified. Three men known as rioters in their town are at the bar drinking away when the tavern boy goes on describing the passing of their dear friend. Saying their friend was murdered by Death himself. The three men are outraged and in their drunken stage, vow to find Death and destroy it to avenge their friend. As the men babble …show more content…
On their way to find Death, the three rioters stumble upon an old sorrowful man in a shack. The old man hears the three men ranting on about their quest to find death and tells them he has been waiting for Death to come get him, for Death has traveled all over the world. Hearing the old man bring up death, the three men demand the old man to tell them where they can find death so they can kill it. The old man tells them they can find death under the oak tree, the rioters run to find the oak tree and find nothing but a bag full of gold coins. Confused because they did not find death where the old man said they could, they forget about why they were looking for and think about how their lives will become better with the golden coins they have found also they think about not being able to walk back to town with the gold coins or they would all be taken as thieves. There is several examples of irony in the story as well. Example one would be when they all agreed that know matter what they will not become greedy and turn their back on one another because they are like
The man claims he is waiting for Death to take him for some time, and the angered men are enraged by the name Death. The rioters ask where to find Death, and the old man says they can find death under a certain oak tree. The rioters rush to the tree and find gold coins. The men do not want to be taken as thieves, as discover a plan to transport the gold at night. The men direct the youngest to retreat back to town and grab wine. While the youngest is away, the two remaining men design a plan to kill the third to increase their profits. The man in town is also consumed by greed, and he decides to poison the wine. Retreating with the poison wine, the youngest man is killed by the other two rioters. To celebrate, the two men drink the wine. Within minutes, all three of the greedy rioters are dead. After his tale, the Pardoner asked the group for
Situational irony is used in both O’Henry’s “The Ransom of Red Chief” and “The Necklace” by Guy de Maupassant but the effect of the techniques on the tone of each story is very different. In O’Henry’s story, the protagonist, Red Chief, is being kidnapped by two criminals, Bill and Sam. There are many ironic events that occur in the story. For example, the reader expects Red Chief to want to go back home to his family but instead, he is having the time of his life. As hard as Bill tries, he cannot even send him home. Bill utters to Sam, “‘I showed him the road to Summit and kicked him about eight feet nearer there at one kick’” (6). This is comical because it is using a literary technique known as slapstick comedy. The reader can imagine Bill swinging his leg and kicking Red Chief all the way back to Summit. Another example of situational irony in the story is that the reader would expect that Red Chief to be scared but what is actually happening is that Bill is terrified. While speaking with Sam, Bill complains about Red chief yet again, “‘I’ve stood by you without batting an eye ...
In “The Pardoner’s Tale,” Geoffrey Chaucer masterfully frames an informal homily. Through the use of verbal and situational irony, Chaucer is able to accentuate the moral characteristics of the Pardoner. The essence of the story is exemplified by the blatant discrepancy between the character of the storyteller and the message of his story. By analyzing this contrast, the reader can place himself in the mind of the Pardoner in order to account for his psychology.
The first example of irony is when the enemies become good friends and welcomed guests. The fallen tree trunk symbolizes their captivation, which forces them to become friends. The imagery of the mountains and forest that Saki describes also adds to the irony, as their friendship is different from the harsh environment. The second example of irony is when wolves show up instead of what they thought were humans. The symbolism of their shouts and the tree trunk show how their friendship was actually meaningless, as their chances of surviving the encounter with the wolves is slim. The imagery of the now gloomy forest help to show irony, as the reader can now anticipate the friendship ending poorly, which is exemplified through the wolves arriving. Thus, the irony, and the symbolism and imagery used to show the irony, are all done as a means to create more suspense to effectively establish a more exciting
A pardoner is a person that could relieve someone from their sins. In the case of the Pardoners Tale, the Pardoner expects money for relieving sinners from their sins and for telling a story. The pardoner in this tale is hypocritical, his scare tactics prove this. He says that greed over things like money is an evil thing, and his audience should give him large amounts of money so he can pardon them from their sins.
of Death. When a young boy is asked what happened to a man who had just
The Crucible, by the playwright Arthur Miller, is a four act play which dramatizes the story behind the Salem Witch Trials as an allegory to the McCarthyism era. In the play, a young girl named Abigail Williams is caught in the middle of hysteria which the townspeople of Salem believe is witchcraft. Abigail and several young girls are seen dancing in the forest, so she becomes afraid she will be charged a witch. She threatens the other girls involved to go along with her story as she begins to accuse numerous amounts of innocent people of being involved in witchcraft. The whole scenario is ironic in the way that the people accused “evil” are actually good, and the “good” girls accusing are the ones corrupted by evil. As the play continues,
myself be a full vicious man, A moral tale yet I you telle kan.’ The
In the story “The Gift of the Magi” by O. Henry, situational irony is used, there are clues about the surprise ending, a lesson is learned, and the story would look very different without the situational irony. First, O. Henry uses situational irony, which is when the end result is not what was intended. In the story, Della and Jim both give up their prized possessions to buy the other a gift for Christmas. Unfortunately, the gifts they bought for each other went with the prized possession they gave up. Della gave up her hair and received brushes, while Jim gave up his watch and received a fob chain.
There are seven deadly sins that, once committed, diminish the prospect of eternal life and happiness in heaven. They are referred to as deadly because each sin is closely linked to another, leading to other greater sins. The seven deadly sins are pride, envy, anger, sloth, gluttony, avarice, and lechery. Geoffrey Chaucer's masterpiece, The Canterbury Tales, provided an excellent story about the deadly sins. Focusing mainly on the sins of pride, gluttony and greed, the characters found in The Canterbury Tales, particularly The Pardoner's Tale, were so overwhelmed by their earthly desires and ambitions that they failed to see the effects of their sinful actions, therefore depriving themselves of salvation.
When it is the Pardoner’s turn to tell a tale he gives the pilgrims a sermon that is dripping in irony. He discusses the various sins and how they ruin mankind, but meanwhile he breaks every one of them. Then the exemplum he gives is no better, where the characters are also committing the very sins the Pardoner was trying to preach against. The Pardoner blurs the line between reality and his story, and finds himself so immersed in his speech that he loses track of what is appropriate.
The three rioters are shown as drinkers, gamblers, and, once their quest to kill Death is declared, also heretics. This is mildly ironic because the protagonists of the tale do not exhibit heroic qualities, nor do they fit the bill as good religious models. Later in the tale, the three men meet an old man, who says that Death will not take his life. This is ironic because, while the young characters die later in the story, the old man keeps on living, which suggests that age does not necessarily correlate to the proximity of death. Furthermore, the old man advises the three characters to go to a nearby tree, where he claims Death is located.
Throughout literature, relationships can often be found between the author of a story and the story that he writes. In Geoffrey Chaucer's frame story, Canterbury Tales, many of the characters make this idea evident with the tales that they tell. A distinct relationship can be made between the character of the Pardoner and the tale that he tells.
The Canterbury Tales is a literary masterpiece in which the brilliant author Geoffrey Chaucer sought out to accomplish various goals. Chaucer wrote his tales during the late 1300’s. This puts him right at the beginning of the decline of the Middle Ages. Historically, we know that a middle class was just starting to take shape at this time, due to the emerging commerce industry. Chaucer was able to see the importance and future success of the middle class, and wrote his work with them in mind. Knowing that the middle class was not interested in lofty philosophical literature, Chaucer wrote his work as an extremely comical and entertaining piece that would be more interesting to his audience. Also, Chaucer tried to reach the middle class by writing The Canterbury Tales in English, the language of the middle class rather than French, the language of the educated upper class. The most impressive aspect of Chaucer’s writing is how he incorporated into his piece some of his own controversial views of society, but yet kept it very entertaining and light on the surface level. One of the most prevalent of these ideas was his view that certain aspects of the church had become corrupt. This idea sharply contrasted previous Middle Age thought, which excepted the church’s absolute power and goodness unquestionably. He used corrupt church officials in his tales to illustrate to his audience that certain aspects of the church needed to be reformed. The most intriguing of these characters was the Pardoner. Chaucer’s satirical account of the Pardoner is written in a very matter-of-fact manner that made it even more unsettling with his audience. Chaucer uses his straightforwardness regarding the hypocrisy of the Pardoner, suggestive physiognomy of the character, and an interesting scene at the conclusion of the Pardoner’s Tale to inculcate his views of the church to his audience. The way that Chaucer used these literary devices to subtly make his views known to an audience while hooking them with entertainment, shows that Chaucer was truly a literary genius.
The irony in this poem is the main plot of the poem. A man has taken a