Personality And Job Performance

1350 Words3 Pages

Job performance manages the information, skills, mentality, and information that are obliged to help one to perform the undertakings task in the set of expectations of the organization. Job Performance can be distinguished into two different classifications, which includes task and contextual behavior (counterproductive behavior and citizenship behavior)(Rotundo & Sackett, 2002). Rotundo and Sackett (2002) expressed that one of the task performance behavior have the capability of changing over the company recourses into a merchandise. Overall, organizations are constantly utilizing employment execution, which portray of guaranteeing the greatest potential of job performance on each worker. Yet, personality had as of late settled a lot of consideration by numerous organizations. This is because the relationship between personality and job performance are distinctive base on their surrounding workforce. Beside, job performance may be able to lead the organization to success or failure. As a few of researchers had been directed, a proper of meaning of personality is a synthesis of trademark example that made up of thoughts, feelings, and behavior that make an individual one of a kind from others (Buchanan & Huczynski, 2010). Researcher had found a vast majority of theory and types of personality, which includes Type A and Type B personality theory, Myers-Briggs Types Indicator (MBTI®), and FFM theory (Robbins, Judge, Millett, Boyle, 2014). However, the most noteworthy theory that could demonstrate personality more effectively would be the FFM (The Big Five theory). Goldberg (1990, as cited in Garcia, Aluja, and Garcia, 2004) expressed that the Big Five Model or FFM could be able to use to illustrate the noteworthy parts of indivi... ... middle of paper ... ...etzer, 2003) described that emotional stability refer to individual who is patient, relax, self-control, and able to maintain stressful situation without losing control. In argument, Hörmann and Maschke (1996 as cited in Rothmann & Coetzer, 2003) believed that neuroticism can be use to foresee the performance of individual in various jobs. While researchers such as Dunn, Mount, Barrick, and Ones (1995 as cited Rothmann & Coetzer, 2003) added that the second most critical traits that influences employability of applicants is emotional stability. In a late discovery, Judge, Higgins, Thoresen and Barrick (1999 as cited in Moutafi, Furnham, and Crumo, 2007) claimed that job performance and neuroticism has an inverse relationship. Though, Salgado (1997 as cited in Rothmann and Coetzer, 2003) advised that job performance can be foresees in some conditions by neuroticism.

Open Document