Persepolis And The Great Gatsby Analysis

1577 Words4 Pages

Although F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Great Gatsby and Marjane Satrapi’s Persepolis represent two vastly different cultures and time periods, both explore the social context of those respective time periods. The two authors’ contrasting approaches to uncovering the social attitudes reveal two separate themes; in Persepolis, Satrapi examines social class divisions in Iranian society, while in The Great Gatsby, Fitzgerald exposes the truths of upper-class society during the Roaring Twenties. Both works highlight the deep divide in wealth between social classes, revealing the failures of social institutions. Both Persepolis and The Great Gatsby share the idea that social class is an inescapable facet of society. However, Fitzgerald downright challenges this notion of social class with the character of Gatsby, while Satrapi reveals a basic acceptance of social division. Gatsby, born into a poor social class, tries …show more content…

A parallel can be drawn between the relationship between Daisy and Gatsby and Marji’s maid, Mehri, and her neighbor, Hossein. Although Mehri wants to be with Hossein, Marji’s father remarks that the pairs’ love was “impossible” because “you must stay within your own social classes” in Iran; Mehri cannot escape the class she was born into (Satrapi 37). The post-WWI economic boom resulted in increased social mobility and the reawakening of the pursuit of the American Dream, then defined by wealth and prosperity; Fitzgerald kills the character of Gatsby to reveal the increasingly unobtainable nature and corruption of the American Dream and as an

Open Document