People Vs. Vasquez: A Case Study

1505 Words4 Pages

In the case of People v. Vasquez, a horrible crime was committed by the defendant, Jesus Vasquez, because he was upset with his girlfriend, Abigail Ramirez, for leaving him and allegedly seeing her ex-boyfriend. Instead of choosing to talk to his ex-girlfriend, Abigail Ramirez, he decided to forcefully break into her home, push her mother down on to the ground, then chase Abigail to the restroom where he violently and horrendously murdered her. There were many primary and secondary victims in this case and left people in pain from his terrible criminal act. Although the defense tries to prove that it was Heat of Passion and that the defendant did not know what he was doing, the evidence proves otherwise. The video shows evidence of shared …show more content…

His brother murdered his wife’s sister. He was affected by the criminal act emotionally. Angry at his brother for his actions and bereaved that he lost his sister-in-law as well as seeing the pain his wife was going through. There is also Roberto “Crazy Boy” Garcia who is the ex-boyfriend of Abigail Ramirez and spoke to her just a day before she was murdered. Although he had just been released from prison and did not have a close relationship with the victim, he was still affected. Abigail was not only his ex-girlfriend but she was also a friend of his. Secondary victims are not limited to only special relationships such as knowing the victim or being neighbors or friends. These types of victims are the people who are affected, just not as severely as the primary victims. In this case, the secondary victims also include Deputy District Attorney Chris Lindberg, Judge Hammes, the bailiffs in the court room, the jury members, and the guests in the courtroom. These people are not directly involved or affected by the loss of Abigail Ramirez but are emotionally affected by the facts of the case.
In the video of the case of People v. Vasquez, there was evidence of shared responsibility by two of the victim’s family members. Shared responsibility, by definition, is the perspective that the offender does not bear total responsibility for the criminal act, and that some of the blame falls either on the victim or the social system, or both. Summed up, shared responsibility is a possible explanation for why a particular person was harmed by a certain offender. (Karmen, Crime Victims: An Introduction to Victimology,

More about People Vs. Vasquez: A Case Study

Open Document