Pentagon Papers Pros And Cons

1536 Words4 Pages

The Pentagon Papers were a set of leaked documents from the United States Department of Defense about the country’s involvement with the Vietnam War. The documents were leaked by a RAND corporation employee by the name of Daniel Ellsberg. He gradually became opposed to the war in Vietnam, so he photocopied the secret report and gave his copy to the New York Times to be shown to the public. The papers, known from then on as the Pentagon Papers, were successfully published by the New York Times despite attempts from the US government to stop it, citing national security risk. Some may say that the Papers have made for a more trustworthy government today. However, evidence suggests that the publishing of these covert documents have led to an increase …show more content…

Nixon’s close aide, H.R. Haldeman, spoke about the influence during a covertly recorded Oval Office meeting. “‘Out of the gobbledegook comes a very clear thing,’ said Haldeman on June 14, 1971. ‘You can't trust the government, you can't believe what they say, and you can't rely on their judgment,’” (Swaine). The country’s administration knew that the leaks were going to reflect their image poorly. If the whole of America knew the entire story of the War, they would start asking themselves questions. Even the government thought it would be hard to trust the government after the …show more content…

“Ellsberg’s actions managed to institutionalize a profound paranoia in the psyche of a presidential administration, convincing the President that he would never be safe from a vast radical ‘conspiracy’ seeking to destroy him. It was this paranoia that led to the creation of the White House Special Investigations Unit. Informally referred to as the Plumbers, this unit was the ultimate manifestation of Nixon’s determination to use covert and extralegal means not only to investigate Ellsberg, but to fight back against the putative liberal ‘conspiracy.’” (Moran). The fact that the government was fighting against the leaks led to even more distrust from the public. If the leaders of the country couldn’t let this information go easily, it reinforced the idea the government was trying to keep the valuable information away from the public. As a result, citizens wondered what other information they were being kept out of

Open Document