More handpicked essays just for you.
Parental consent on abortion for minors
Psychological impact of abortion
Parental consent on abortion for minors
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Parental consent on abortion for minors
Dear State Representative Brian Sims, I am writing to you because I am believer that women who wish to have an abortion should not have a hard time getting one. In Pennsylvania there are many restrictions in place that make it hard for a woman to get the procedure done. I understand that there are varying opinions and views on abortion but I do not think that having a mandatory wait period of 24 hours is needed. I believe that the 24 hours is there to make the women feel worse about her decision rather than to relax her state of mind. In Pennsylvania, a minor must have the consent of a parent to have an abortion. I believe for many reasons why a minor does not have to tell their parents. A minor could feel unsafe telling the parents because
Justice Steven argued that the 24-hour delay period fails both parts of the undue burden. For a provision to be under it must be because it is too severe or lacks a legitimate rational function. For the person seeking an abortion I think they should not be required to wait 24 hours. As, a physician’s duty is to notify the patient about the requirements and procedures it should not be required for the patient to wait and process that knowledge. I believe after the physicians notifies the patient they have the option of going through with that procedure that day or waiting and making that decision. The information given is common knowledge and should not be required to wait a 24 hour to decide. This provision should not be implemented by the government it should
How can a child make the decision for the life of another child by themselves? In this paper I will outline the mental, physical, and safety issues of minors (age 18 and under) having an abortion and why it is so important that they need to get parental consent before making this life long decision.
Meyers, Christopher, & Woods, Robert D. (1996). An obligation to provide abortion services: what happens when physicians refuse? Journal of Medical
Abortion can emotionally affect individual women differently. For the most part, many women suffer from PAS. “According to Lee, as moral arguments have had limited success in recent years in influencing legislation
The Supreme Court case, Planned Parenthood of PA v. Casey, wasn’t known for what it did, but mainly for what it did not do, which was not overruling Roe v. Wade, but reaffirming a woman’s right to an abortion; it questioned a state’s right to impose or place an “undue burden” on women. Planned Parenthood of PA v. Casey was argued on April 22, 1992 and the official decision was reached on June 29, 1992. The case dealt with a couple of “hot topics” including privacy and abortion. At the time, Pennsylvania had made a new abortion control law in 1988 and it was finalized in 1989. This law requires all women to get informed consent and wait twenty-four hours before they are allowed to get an abortion.
If you live in Texas, which is a primary conservative state with old traditional views, abortion is frowned upon. Since they can not make abortion illegal they passed their very restrictive abortion law called HB2 in 2011. This law has since changed the way many women get reproductive health care, not just abortions. Some of this laws new provisions are, Providers who perform abortions have to have admitting privileges in a hospital within 30 miles of the clinic. Clinics would also have to upgrade their facilities to meet the standards of an outpatient surgery center. This is an expensive
Abortion has been one of the hottest political issues over a number of years. The issue of abortion is a huge debate between pro-lifers, people against abortion, and pro-choicers, people who support abortion. Since the Roe v. Wade court case in 1973, which legalized abortion, laws dealing with abortion have been altered in each individual state. Due to these laws, organizations such as the National Organization for Women (NOW) and Feminists for Life of America (FFL), have been created to debate the issues of abortion and stand up for what they believe. The laws in Pennsylvania and the Christian Bible have their own perspective on this “hot button” topic of abortion. These sources have similar and opposing opinions that offer a never-ending argument on this issue.
HB2 stated that abortion providers must “meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers” and that abortion providers must have “…admitting privileges…at a hospital not further than 30 miles from the location at which the abortion is performed or induced” (Pruitt and Vanegas 2015; Texas Legislature 2013; Whole Women 's Health v. Hellerstedt 2016). Unlike previous regulatory attempts by the state of Texas, which cited the well-being of women as the motivation for regulation, HB2 clearly stated that “…the state has a compelling interest in protecting the lives of unborn children…” (Texas State Legislature 2013). Studies conducted during the time period after the passage of HB2 until the repeal of the portion requiring that centers meet the standards of ambulatory surgical centers found that HB2 had created a standard that abortion providers could not meet without undue burden (Pruitt and Vanegas 2015; Fuentes 2016; Gerdts 2016). Instead, many abortion providers closed their doors, leaving some individuals with no local options for abortion providers (Fuentes 2016; Gerdts 2016). In separate studies, Fuentes (2016) and Gerdts (2016) found that when clinics closed due to their inability to prescribe to the requirements of HB2, they left the individuals who would have used those abortion clinics without access to abortion providers. This in turn meant if women decided that they would pursue an abortion in a different
Rationale for banning abortions late in pregnancy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 744-747, 1998. Guttmacher Institute. State Policies on Later-Term Abortions. State Policies in Brief.
To be able to get an abortion, there are many restrictions that apply. Every state may different but similar restrictions when the law was formed in 1973. Even with the restrictions, many women were still choosing abortions. “The mandatory restrictions include: waiting periods typically from 24-48 hours before women receive the procedure; counseling stressing the disadvantages of abortions; requirements that minors notify their parents or receive their consent before obtaining an abortion; and prohibitions on providing abortions at public facilities,” (Glazer 1). Some women either could
...ason to. At some point you got to take responsibility for what you have done and look at other options which is where I feel like Planned Parenthood does a good job at because they help the client weigh out there options and think of other ways to deal with the situation. Abortion is a very controversial topic and when it comes to this issue they should be at happy medium place where everybody could be OK with the idea. I understand both views, which is why I cannot just choose one side over the other because each side have valid points. Each situation is different for each person so we cannot make a decision based on how a group of people feels. In conclusion I believe that only have the right to choose what she feels like is best for her to do, but I also believe in taking accountability and understanding that there 's always going to be a reaction to every action
In America, one million teenagers get pregnant every year (National Abortion Federation, 2003). Of these pregnancies, 78% are unplanned because these teenagers start having sex at a very young age and are unaware of ways to prevent pregnancies. Thirty five percent of the pregnant teenagers chose to abort, as they fear that the consequences of the pregnancy might cause significant effects to their lives. The problems that come with teenage pregnancies include dropping out of school, receiving inadequate prenatal care, developing health problems, relying on public assistance to raise a child, and probably divorcing their partners. In most states, the law allows pregnant teenagers to take their babies for adoption without consulting their parents. The same laws allow the teenagers to have an abortion but require parental notification or consent before carrying out the procedure. These laws prove biased as they favor one resolution over the other, as they force some to bear babies they do not want by restricting their options.
Women should be able to be adults before they can undergo this kind of complex procedure, which is why women should be at least 18 and over in California to be able to have an abortion with no questions asked. Something about body and maturity in age, or change number depending on science. Since teenage pregnancies are so high in California, with more than a million girls under the age of 20 become pregnant in the 90’s, and a reported 42 percent of those pregnancies ended in abortions. (Clark, 1991). For those minors who prefer to end their pregnancy, they must have consent from 1 legal guardian before they can have an abortion. The signature must be verified and the said guardian must be contacted as well as attend the procedure with the minor. Under any circumstances, a minor cannot come in to the hospital for an abortion without any of the requirements, and if an abortion is conducted, both the physician and the minor will be faced with felony
Those exemptions are the mature minor, the emancipated minor and an emergency situation. With the mature minor exception, a minor can consent to obtain medical care without parental consent or notification if the court decides that the minor has the maturity to make independent decisions. A minor may also seek medical care without parental consent if he can convince the court that he is mature enough to act in his own best interest and thus make an independent judgment to consent to treatment. Once the court has decided that a minor is sufficiently mature enough to act in his own best interest and make an independent decision to consent to treatment, it is then unlawful for judicial permission to be withheld. The process is known as judicial bypass. Judicial bypass has regularly allowed minors another option to consent for care in states where parental notification or parental consent is required for adolescents seeking an abortion. In 1990, the Supreme Court ruled in that judicial bypass is constitutionally mandatory if state law requires parental notification or consent. Opponents of judicial bypass believes this process places an undue burden on adolescents seeking an abortion. The determination of maturity provides necessary authorization for a minor to exercise her right to privacy without
As we see in the world today many teens are becoming mothers before they finish high school or before they turn 18. Although some teens are on birth control already many are not because they are afraid to tell their parents which may lead to their parents thinking they are sexually active. Moreover, teens usually find themselves in a professional clinic trying to seek different options of birth control but they are derailed by having parental consent or notification. Many clinics have a policy were teen needs to have parental consent to receive birth control. Many parents feel that teens should be able to make the choice by themselves if they are having sex or just being careful.