Paul's Reflection

1894 Words4 Pages

I must admit that I have never been a prodigious reader of Paul. My initial understanding of Paul is that everything points to the cross and therefore away from the life and ministry of Jesus of Nazareth. I have always felt that his proclamation of “Christ crucified” ignored the inclusion of the sayings and works of Jesus prior to his death and resurrection, and because of this, Jesus’ sayings were relegated to second place over and above Paul’s own theological vision.
Prior to studying Paul, I believed that his main message to his Christian communities about salvation in Christ was essentially about a belief that through the cross and the vindication of the resurrection, Jesus was the rightful Messiah of Israel; one just simply needed to believe in this idea to be justified. Contrary to this idea, I have always leaned heavily on the book of James (James 2:14-26).
Concerning Paul’s expectations of how his communities were to behave, while he has always been consistent in expressing the love principle and that all things come from God, Paul was also responding to specific circumstances that arose in the early Christian communities. In so doing, whether intentionally or unintentionally, he created a set of values that would be later erroneously built upon to justify the condemnation of homosexuals (1 Corinthians 6:9–10) and the servitude of women to their husbands (1 Cor. 11:3; 7-9; 14:33-35).
Whatever my ideas were before studying Paul, he has always been the linch-pin to my faith, my firm belief that Jesus of Nazareth was raised from the dead, which confirms his authority as the true Messiah. Without Paul, one can doubt the existence of the resurrection and dismiss the other Apostles’ resurrection experiences as some sor...

... middle of paper ...

...effect on my soul. Now, as never before, the words “Christ crucified” are highly significant in my perception of what it means to partake of communion and to be a Christian.
Aside from Paul’s theological works, the most significant addition to my faith development has been the exposure to the pistis Christou debate. The idea of having “faith in Christ” has always presented me with a spiritual challenge. It always seemed to me that all I had to do was simply believe that Jesus was the true Messiah and I would then be saved, but to have the “faith of Christ” completely redefines my spiritual world view. If indeed this is what Paul meant, and I would like to think it was, then this transforms my faith from that of believing to that of doing. Having the “faith of Christ” demands more of me and connects me to the Jesus of Nazareth, not only the crucified Christ.

Open Document