Pastizzi Café Pty Ltd v Hossain was the case of Supreme Court of New South Wales in July in 2011. In this Case, there were three Plaintiff named Pastizzi Café Pty Ltd, Deborah Ross, Leonard Ross and Two Defendant named Miraj Hossain, Talukder Enterprises Pty Ltd. Micheal Fitzgearld was the solicitor of Plaintiffs and Mooney & Kennedy were Defendant Solicitor. In this case, Mr Hossain and Ms Ross started the business of Pastizzi in 2007.At that time Mr Hossain and Ms Ross were the directors and shareholder of Pastizzi and Mr Ross did not become a director of Pastizzi because he wants to finish his previous relationship. In 2011, Mr Hossain wants his share from the business. He wants that Ms Ross vacant the King Street premises of Pastizzi
Fraud is one of Canada's most severe acts of financial criminality as the economic impact of this crime could potentially handicap an entire society. According to the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre Annual Statistic Report (CAFC), a report established to monitor fraud with the aid of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP), and Competition Bureau of Canada, it reported an annual loss of 74 million dollars affecting over 14,472 victims (Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, 2014). Given this alarming statistic, it is worrisome that we as a society still ignore or turn a blind eye towards those who commit fraud as seen in the low conviction (Canada Revenue Agency, 2014), and focus our efforts on petty thefts as seen with the high rate of convictions
Friganim Importing Co. v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp. Facts: Friganim Importing Company sued B.N.S. claiming that B.N.S. breached warranties in two contracts that they had entered into. In the first of the two contracts, Frigalimnet had agreed to sell 75,000 pounds of 2.5 to 3 pound chickens and 25,000 pounds of 1.5 to 2 pound chickens. The second contract consisted of 50,000 pounds of 2.5 to 3 pound chickens and 25,000 pounds of 1.5 to 2 pound chickens. (smaller chickens where priced slightly higher in this contract than the first agreement)
In my opinion, if the jury in this case subtracted the contractual claims against the profits, they would have arrived at different damage/entitlement amounts. My guess is Main Line would have been entitled to much less than what was awarded in this case.
Poniatowska v Hickinbotham [2009] FCA 680 and the unsuccessful appeal against the decision (Employment Services Australia Pty Ltd v Poniatowska [2010] FCAFC 92) are remarkable cases concerning various allegations of conduct constituting sexual harassment (SH) and unlawful discrimination on grounds of sex. The reasoning of Mansfield at first instance (which is accepted by the judges at appeal) adequately addresses issues of credibility, standard of workplace policies regarding SH and discrimination, and etc. The aim of this research paper is to assess the court’s approach to the conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment, respondent’s response to the allegations, and the assessment of damages. It will be viewed in light of the broader issues raised by the scholars regarding sexual harassment and discrimination and the Sex Discrimination Act (the SD Act).
As making a decision is a critical behavior, Biz café was absolutely a practical learning experience because it provided me make decisions based on the significant factors of running a business. Moreover, what I have learned from my experience of doing biz café simulation can be divided into two parts such as identifying business essential factors and clarifying the importance of group effects. To begin with, I have become familiar with the significant aspects of managing and running a business although it was difficult to comprehend how to consider the aspects work together at the beginning of the simulation. For instance, vital factors to decide such as managing, marketing and accounting influenced me that I should spend money on acquiring my customers to increase sales and satisfactions as they directly make up a large part of the revenue and net income.
In Baca's poem, it is evident from the very beginning that he's setting a tone of utter
Statement: Benjamin M. Harrington Statement of the incident that happen on April 11, 2016 with my co-worker Pramond Patel.
This Hobby Lobby case was decided totally upon the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) that became law in 1993. The problem is the Supreme Court’s ruling in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores is one of the demonstration that anti-discrimination regulations can practically induce heightened discrimination than they inhibit. This regulation, RFRA has effectively worked to protect that several anti-discrimination laws. However, Regulations that target religion on purpose are and should be legally suspect, but the RFRA progress more and more, empowering intentional omissions to laws that oppress religious activities. The RFRA menaces rational set of laws, including Unite States Constitution and Amendments forbidding discrimination against other
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
A restaurant’s success is often dependent on its location. Restaurant’s that are located near other restaurants can enough synergistic benefits due to their location (Parsa, Self, Njite, & King, 2005). However, choosing the wrong location can also spell certain doom for the establishment. In general, restauranteurs must ensure that they are making enough profit to justify the demands put forth by their landlord and the local government. For this reason, the restaurant’s deed or rental agreement is one of the most important document in determining a restaurant’s fate. This paper seeks to examine the issues associated with leasing restaurant property; in particular Harlequin and Brine, an upscale casual restaurant.
Cafédirect is the UK’s first and largest 100% Fairtrade drinks brand. It is the only tea and coffee brand to have received ethical accreditation from the Ethical Company Organization, top marks in all categories across Fairtrade, human, anima...
This firm is operating in an industry that has many other many players. These competitors could create competition to Porcini’s Inc. This will reduce the market share of firm thus reducing its profitability and consequently limits its market growth. In such scenario, it is upon the firm to make the right decision in order to ensure that it will retain its competiveness in the market. Entering the fast food industry needs also to be taken with a clear approach so as to reduce stiff competition from large firms like McDonald.
Although both “The Cask of Amontillado” and “The Most Dangerous Game” are from different times and places, their two main character are alike in their heartless, murderous desire. In Edgar Allan Poe short story, “The Cask of Amontillado”, Montresor is the protagonist who seeks for revenge because of an insult made by his friend, Fortunado. This story happens in streets of Venice, Italy where Montresor plans this terrifying plan to kill Fortunado, most of his plan consist in the catacombs under his house. Montresor commits the crime and gets away without consequences. In the other hand, Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game”, the principal character is General Zaroff who lives in an isolated island called Ship Trap Island.
Stuart v. Nappi was class lawsuit Stuart’s mother filed against school personnel and the Danbury Board of Education because she claimed that her daughter was not receiving the rights granted in the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). Kathy Stuart was a student at Danbury High School in Connecticut with serious emotional, behavior, and academic difficulties. She was suppose to be in special education classes, but for some reason she hardly ever attended them. Kathy was involved in a school-wide disturbance. As a result of her complicity in these disturbances, she received a ten-day disciplinary suspension and was scheduled to appear at a disciplinary hearing. The Superintendent of Danbury Schools recommended to the Danbury Board of Education
This article is about Harrah’s Entertainment; one of the largest casino entertainments made a decision to move away from being a product based company to a strategic marketing company geared towards customer satisfaction by implementing a customer focused rewards program. Bill Harrah, the founder of the company established the company’s reputation on the premise of pride of the employees working for “the best in the business” while given more attention to the condition of the properties. However, when Gary Loveman joined the company as the new Chief operating officer, he made a move towards customer service. Gary Loveman hired Marilyn Winn, the head of Human Resources, to change how the company engaged in people development. Winn came up with a strategic plan to develop Harrah’s human capital. As a result, Winn is faced with the difficult task of improving employee motivation and job satisfaction in a rough economy after 9/11, which changed our nation forever. Although, the company gained market share it did not quite meet the company’s projected level.