Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
British political system short note
The development of the 2 party system
Birth of the 2 party system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: British political system short note
Party Politics in the UK Today
Since the 1970s, and the decline to the two party system, party
politics in the UK has emerged as a multi-party society with an ever
increasing sense on global politics. However, despite the 'new'
system of a multi-party political system, there have been episodes of
one party dominance in government.
Political parties pre-1970 were mainly built upon the class divide
that existed in Britain. Over time, the class divisions (for example
working class, middle class, and upper class) began to erode as the
times changed, due to more employment, and a greater spread of wealth
among the population. During Thatcher’s term in office at Number 10,
the class divisions that were prominent in the United Kingdom began to
break down, with the working class becoming (almost) nonexistent due
to the explosion of employment and ‘white collar’ work. These days,
it is the North-South Divide that tends to show divisions in politics
and not class. Although, some elements of class can still be seen in
politics and within the electorate. Over the last half of the
twentieth century, the Conservative Party had a large proportion of
the electorate in the south of Britain, with the Labour Party doing
the same in the north of Britain. This therefore leads some to wonder
how can a party call itself a national party if it only attracts
voters from certain regions of the country - this then mirrors the
class divide. Nonetheless, these divisions were not so evident during
the Conservative victory of 1979 and, more recently, the Labour
landslide victory in 1997. Regardless of this, there is an increasing
amount of voter apat...
... middle of paper ...
... party leaving
behind the days of Old Labour (along with the factions and shackles of
deep trade union links) bringing forward a 'new' political party for
the twenty first century. Which would prove to be a highly effective
opposition party, and ‘stabilise’ government in Britain. At the same
time as this, the Scottish Nationalist Party and Plaid Cymru were
developing their own forms/styles of devolved government form
Westminster. This began to change the face of British politics (and
indeed the constitution) in a way it had never been changed before.
In conclusion, British politics today is varied, but once again it is
dominated by one party (the Labour Party). The question is, how long
can the Labour Party stay in power? Will the new Leader of the
Opposition (Michael Howard) prove to be an effective opposition?
In recent times the in the UK we have seen the more frequent use of
If you have ever read the book 1984 by George Orwell, then an interesting topic may have crossed your mind. The way the classes of people break down can be quite similar, and very different at times. In the United States, we have classes like the lower class, the working class, and the middle class. In 1984, there were such classes as the Proles, the Outer Party, and the Inner Party. The way the classes are broken down in 1984 reminds me a little bit of my old history class. When I studied medieval times and the classes back then were broken down into the nobles, the bourgeois, and the serfs.
In light of the recent Senate scandal, the public’s attention has been directed to the government’s credibility and its members’ discipline again. Mike Duffy’s 90,000 dollars scandal has put the Canadian government’s party discipline into the spotlight. While it is well-known amongst general public, there are other similar incentives and disincentives shared between the Members of the Parliament (MPs) and senators in keeping them disciplined, as well as some different ones that set them apart. In this essay, I am going to analyze the main levers of party discipline in the House of Commons and the Senate for their effectiveness. By comparing the similarities and differences, I will explain for the motivations behind the Senate, even if they have seemingly fewer incentives than the MPs, such as free of worrying about being re-elected.
...e a lot of parties are going to be running for office. However, for the fringe parties this creates a major advantage for them. With the load of political parties in the House of Commons, there would be a wider range of interests for people but there would be a lot of indecision and coalitions.
roots and is by no means as socialist as it was. But is it still
...bour party. However in 1914 many people saw Labour as a radical group on the Left Wing of the Liberals rather than a separate party.
middle of paper ... ... d therefore the smaller parties can be considered to have very little effect on the overall political situation. In conclusion, the UK can still best be described as a two party system, provided two considerations are taken into account. The first is that Conservative dominance victories between 1979-97 was not a suggestion of party dominance and that eventually, the swing of the political pendulum will be even for both sides. This can perhaps be seen today with Labour's two landslide victories in 1997 and 2001.
have no money they will have no power. However it is said that if the
Thatcher and Thatcherism It is now twenty years since Margaret Thatcher was elected Prime Minister of Great Britain, and over eight years since she left office. So this seems a good opportunity to look back at what Thatcher and Thatcherism may have achieved, and what may be the lessons for today. I must start with a disclaimer. I'm the British High Commissioner and normally speak on behalf of the British Government in Australia.
In modern society these 3 traditional social classifications, working, middle and upper class are outdated, fitting less than 40 percent of the United Kingdom's population. In April 2013 the British Broadcast Corporation introduced a new model for social classification, within the United Kingdom. Social class and socioeconomic groups traditionally have been defined by income, occupation and ed...
Political parties have been in a declining state in recent political evolution and has provoked numerous discussions/arguments whether the political parties have been indeed in such a state or whether they have been simply restructuring their organisational and/or ideological principles to withstand certain challenges. Several theories were introduced/developed in the recent years so as to distinguish the “ideal” behavioural type of political party development. The most renowned “ideal” party types are the cadre party type, the mass party type (Duverger, 1954) and the catch-all party type (Kirchheimer, 1966). Nevertheless, a recent theory regarding party types proposed initially by Richard Katz and Peter Mair (1995) was the “Cartel Party” which also drew a lot of academic interest. The “Cartel Party” is a new model of political party development suggested by Richard Katz & Peter Mair (1995) as the last decades the electoral support and partisanship levels have been decreasing substantially, while voter volatility increased; thus political parties began to seek state subsidies and other much needed resources directly through the state, in order to secure “control” of the electoral rules, subsidies from the state and the media as well. Concomitantly, political parties allegedly employ their domination power to even “control” which new political parties may join the “cartel”, and which are left out of the equation. However, this new prospect within the political parties’ mechanism, ultimately alters their organisational and ideological principles, thus in this way give rise to the so-called “Cartel Parties”. In short, the theory of Cartelisation over the political parties suggested by Katz & Mair propose that political parties progre...
and became a threat to the Conservative and Labour Parties. Slowly, more and more smaller parties
The Conservative party is one of the two major political parties in the United Kingdom. It is currently holding power with David Cameron as the Prime Minister. As a right wing party, it has managed to hold power for a fairly substantial amount of time over the last few decades. However, conservatives have been criticized for being “less exploratory” and “less in need of change” (Mooney 2012). Despite this,
The Labour Party The Labour Party has traditionally believed in Socialism, and therefore they reject capitalist ideas and values, believing that Capitalism produces huge wealth for some, and relative poverty for many others. They rejected the idea of revolution, like the Conservative party, preferring evolution, but remains committed to achieving social goals associated with fairness, justice, and equality. Clause 4 of the 1918 Labour Party Constitution committed the party to support the nationalisation of industry to provide the workers with the 'fruit' of their labour, rather than the private ownership of industry for private profit. Traditionally, the labour party has stood for a belief in equality, arguing for a permanent shift of power and wealth away from the rich, privileged and powerful, to the poor, weak, and less privileged members of society, in order to create a 'classless' society.
It is well known that the British political system is one of the oldest political systems in the world. Obviously, it was formed within the time. The United Kingdom of the Great Britain and Northern Ireland is the constitutional monarchy, providing stability, continuity and national focus. The monarch is the head of state, but only Parliament has the right to create and undertake the legislation. The basis of the United Kingdom’s political system is a parliamentary democracy. Therefore, people think the role of the Queen as worthless and mainly unnecessarily demanding for funding, but is it like that?