More handpicked essays just for you.
Negative effects of violence on children
Parents negative violent impacts on children
Negative effects of violence on children
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Parents Hitting Their Children
For this coursework, I will be looking at whether parents should be
allowed to hit their children or children that are being looked after
by them.
Like most questions there are usually two sides to the argument.
The 1st reason why parents should be allowed to hit their kids is to
enforce a form of discipline.
The other reason why hitting children is bad is because by hitting a
child, they may be emotionally scared for life.
Many people have different views on this topic; some are "for" it,
some are "against" it.
The United Nations (UN) as a violation of basic human rights have
condemned the national U.K. law.
It says that some forms of corporal punishment are acceptable.
However some parents have different perspectives on hitting their
children. Most of them will argue that hitting children is a form of
discipline and by doing so, they will learn how to behave in the
appropriate manor.
They may also argue that their children are too stubborn to respond to
oth...
The doings generally take place by the parent. Hitting a child or anyone with an object is always considered physical abuse. Adrian Peterson does not reflect himself as a child abuser but, hitting a toddler with an object tells others otherwise. “The football star said he disciplined his son the way he was disciplined by his own parents, and credited his success to the style of upbringing.” (Alter, 2014). As an individual, people tend to think this method worked and helped for them, but that does not mean it will work also for their child. A 4-year-old child know right from wrong. When it comes to chastisement, they should not be beaten to where marks, scratches and bruises are visible. SHARPLES TIFFANY
Smacking has become a controversial debate in today’s society as a group of doctors tried to make a smacking of children illegal (Browne 2013). Similarly, smacking caused numerous deaths of children (Browne 2013). Smacking is a physical punishment which was a typical way that parents used to guide their children in past. Moreover, they believe that smacking is more effective and it is acceptable. Physical punishment is illegal in 33 countries, whereas in some states and territories physical punishment by parents is legal as long as it is “reasonable” such as Australia, United State, Britain and Canada (Why smacking should be regarded as a crime 2013). There are several reasons that smacking should be illegal in Australia. Physical punishment leads to aggressive and antisocial behaviour. Furthermore, Australian children have right of protection from violation. Finally, smacking children may lead to death.
t’s in recent years there has been an increased emphasis on dealing with violence and abuse within the UK society in general. Following a focus in the United Kingdom (UK) on child abuse in the 1970s and domestic violence in the 1980s, and in the 1990s the abuse and neglect of older people began to bring up concerns. However, the initial focus of interest was of situations arising in the home settings. More recently, much needed attention has shifted to situations involving institutional settings (Penhale, 2008).
“We look at a person and immediately a certain impression of his character forms itself in us”
It’s easy to say that raising children demands time and effort and being a good parent is complicated. The best way to raise a child for success is to discipline them when it comes to responsibility and respect. Be open to communication with your child. And let them experience new things and express themselves.
Hitting is one kind of behaviour that children present others people with their feeling, and expressing themselves. Children may hit other child when they are fighting with toys. Such as A is playing a toy car, another child B just come and robbing A's car, at that time A's feeling is angry, so that A hit B, that's the way when A get angry, he may have difficulty to express himself verbally. Teachers, parents and whanau should have a responsibility to encourage children to develop their language skills, encourage them to use words to explore their feeling, like " Stop! I don't like it" or "I'm not happy when.....". Children notice and learn from others people's feeling, action and reaction, television and movies are the most influence to the children, because children are lack of copying skill, they are also like copy what the people do in the television or movies, such as Ben10 Watch and ...
The issue of Family violence is that it connects to these types of misconduct in the family violence that
In social work, you learn about population that are at risk. They have the homeless, veterans, immigrants, etc. The most important populations at risk is the children because children are the future of the world. When children have the right upbringing, they have the potential to become president, governor, judges, doctors, priest, scientist etc. This theory also could work in opposite way too. In the 1930s a child was made to watch his father have sex with prostitutes. The father would have all his children sit in a circle as he had sex with these women night after night. That child grew up to be the famous Boston straggler and he killed over 12 women at random.
The physical abuse of children covers a wide range of actions from what some might term ‘justifiable chastisement’ such as slapping or spanning to the sort of actions which most would agree constitute deliberate, sadistic cruelty against children.
Many parents find themselves using frequent sayings such as, “do not touch that”, do not do that”, and “stop being mean to your sister!” Along with those sayings, parents still refer to a specific passage from the Bible, Proverbs 22:15, which states: Foolishness is bound in the heart of a child; but the rod of correction shall drive it far from him. The chapters 22 and 23 of Proverbs speak of how the rod should be used and when. It also tells parents spanking the child will not kill him. Many researchers and parents would argue these facts and state is does cause harm but if they could understand the limitations of the teachings, incorporate communication, and set boundaries the use of a rod would instill wisdom, instruction, and understanding in a child.
Why, then, when they "misbehave" do we not hold, rock, or talk to them? Why do we instead reach for spanking, much as an alcoholic or drug addict reaches for their fix (Dale)? Spanking is like an addiction when the parent always spanks their child. Parents care and worry about their kids over everything else yet chose to hit them when they are misbehaving. When drug addicts or alcoholics feel the need for a fix they go and get it how is it any different then the need to harm their child when they 're not behaving well. Parents over use the spanking technique and it just becomes a habit to use on their child. Another reason we habitually spank our children is that we have become neurologically hooked on "the good fight." With fear and anger comes the release of adrenaline. As this hormone begins coursing through our veins, our hearts start beating faster, our muscles tense, and we prepare for action (Dale). When us humans get mad or angry our muscles tense and we neurologically want to fight. The adrenaline that travels through our veins makes us get ready for ¨fight¨ mode when we are not getting our way or when a child is not listening. Our body reacts in this way because we get so frustrated that our mind thinks we need to fight against the child that is not taking us seriously. Parents may not realize that they
The extent to which a parent negatively disciplines a child for wrongful behavior may lead to a cascade of psychological problems later on in life. Such problems could include problems in learning, romantic relationships, suppression of immoral tendencies, and overall physical health. It seems intuitive that when a young adolescent is exposed to harsh and restrictive parents, certain negative outcomes would ensue causing that adolescent to grow psychologically into a teen or adult with interesting behaviors.
“It hurts and it’s painful inside – it’s like breaking your bones; it’s loud and sore, and it stings; it feels like you’ve been adopted or something and you’re not part of their family; you feel like you don’t like your parents anymore; you feel upset because they are hurting you, and you love them so much, and then all of a sudden they hit you and you feel as though they don’t care about you” (Pritchard 9). These are the feelings of those juveniles who suffer from corporal punishment. Corporal punishment has been one of the main topics of research in Psychology in last few decades. Although people had believed, “Spare the rod and spoil the child” but in the present age of science, research has revealed that the corporal punishment causes more harm to the children instead of having a positive effect on them. According to UNICEF, “Corporal punishment is actually the use of physical measures that causes pain but no wounds, as a means of enforcing discipline” (1). It includes spanking, squeezing, slapping, pushing and hitting by hand or with some other instruments like belts etc. But it is different from physical abuse in which punishment result in wounds and the objective is different from teaching the discipline. Although Corporal punishment is considered to be a mode of teaching discipline and expeditious acquiescence, however, it leads to the disruption of parent-child relationship, poor mental health of juveniles, moral internalization along with their anti-social and aggressive behaviour and it is against the morality of humans.
In South Africa it is still legal for parents to make use of corporal punishment in order to discipline their children. The reason therefore is that a defence exists in South African common-law for parents when a claim based on assault is raised. This defence is known as reasonable disciplinary chastisement and it is seen as ‘n ground of justification. Physical assault, such as corporal chastisement is seen as unlawful. In the following discussion current legislation on the subject, world views and the interpretation of the Constitution will be examined to determine whether or not this defence has a future in South African law.
Because many parents do not know or are confused in showing their children how to gain discipline they do not know whether to hit them or not to hit them. Many people think that by hitting their children that they are showing them violence but other people say that if you do the children would understand that they did something wrong and would not repeat it and gain discipline. What can parents do?