P&G competes in five major industries: fabric and home care, beauty care, baby and family care, health care, and snacks and beverages.
The five forces are the bargaining power of suppliers, the bargaining power of customers, threat of new entrants, threat of substitute products and competitive rivalry within an industry. The various care products are not made with anything rare so the suppliers do not have significant power in this case. So the threat here is low. However, there are many variations of these products so the threats from substitute products, competitive rivalry and new entrants are high. For the same reason, since the customer has a lot of options with regards to these products, loyalty is not guaranteed. So the threat there is very high. Overall, four of the five forces are serious threats so these industries are not attractive.
Since there are many competitors, P&G must find ways to distinguish themselves from their rivals. The factors that determine these are marketing, technological innovation and accurate consumer feedback. In terms of marketing, the public must be aware of the product, what it is used for and what makes it better than other alternatives. In terms of technological innovation, the product should have some advantage over the competitors’ product such as low cost or high performance. In terms of consumer feedback, data should be gathered on what the customer liked about the product, what they did not. This will allow the product to continue to evolve into what the customer wants.
The tangible resources, in the case of P&G, are a relatively large research department, marketing division and budget. P&G always has enforced research since 1890 and marketing since 1931. Its long history of financial...
... middle of paper ...
...was too high, thus Jager’s strategy to achieve sales growth and develop new products quickly did the opposite for the company as sales growth continued to decline.
The current competitive situation for P&G is that it is one of the largest and most successful consumer products companies. This is evident in the high volume of sales and profits experienced by the company. Also, the company has updated all of its brands and created new product categories through innovation of the products, thus P&G is considered a leader in the consumer market. On the other hand, the company made cuts in its capital and research and development spending (which was in line with that of its rivals) in order to increase profits, which may serve to hinder the growth of the company. Therefore, competitively P&G may face difficulty in the growth of its earnings as oppose to its competitors.
The Procter and Gamble Company. (2013, November 17). Company Strategy. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.pginvestor.com: http://www.pginvestor.com/GenPage.aspx?IID=4004124&GKP=208821
The Procter and Gamble Company. (2013, November 17). Company Strategy. Retrieved March 22, 2014, from http://www.pginvestor.com: http://www.pginvestor.com/GenPage.aspx?IID=4004124&GKP=208821
Although Lafley has had success, the underlying problem remains. How will Lafley return P&G to its rightful place in Corporate America? P&G's solution to its problems is through product line extensions, expansion into non-premium brands, as well as acquisitions, licensing, reinforcing market orientation through consumer focus, and outsourcing. This recommendation was based on following items;
Spokane Industries has contracted Franklin Electronics for an 18 month product development contract. Franklin Electronics is new to using project management methodologies and has not been exposed to earned value management methodologies. Even though Franklin and Spokane have worked together in the past, they have mainly used fixed-price contracts with little to no stipulations. For this project, Spokane Industries is requiring Franklin Electronics to use formalized project management methodologies, earned value cost schedules, and schedules for reports and meetings. Since Franklin Electronics had no experience with earned value management, the cost accounting group was trained in the methodology in order to bid for the project.
Burberry today is considered one of the leading luxury brands of the word. Here is a synopsis of rise of Burberry:
Primark is a subsidiary company of the Associated British Foods (ABF). It was first opened in Dublin in June 1969, which under the name Penneys. Four more stores were launched within a year in Ireland afterward. Currently, Primark operates in over 270 stores in 9 different countries in Europe such as United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, etc. Primark capitalised on the fast-fashion tendency that began in the 1990s as well as the capability to produce garments cheaply in Asia where clothing values fell dramatically (Shawcross, 2014). It offers a diverse range of products which includes kids clothing, menswear, womenswear, accessories, home ware, beauty products and confectionary. According to TNS market research ranking, Primark ranks the second
Ben Cohen and Jerry Greenfield founded Ben & Jerry's Homemade Ice Cream in 1978. Over the years, Ben & Jerry's evolved into a socially-oriented, independent-minded industry leader in the super-premium ice cream market. The company has had a history of donating 7.5% of its pre-tax earnings to societal and community causes. Ben and Jerry further extended their generosity by offering 75,000 shares at $10.50 per share exclusively to Vermont residents, so that they may help those who first supported the company; Ben and Jerry's wanted residents to profit from their venture as well. In addition, steady growth and a widely recognized brand name helped Ben and Jerry's obtain 45 percent of the premium ice-cream market, yet the company stock price remained stagnant at $21 a share for several years.
Procter & Gamble looks to capitalize on its core competencies to gain a competitive advantage over its rivals. So far, P&G has demonstrated its competencies in: Consumer Understanding, Innovation, Brand-Building, Go-to Market Capabilities and Scale.
Once America’s most innovative consumer products company, Procter and Gamble (P&G) started by selling soaps and candles in a small Cincinnati storefront in 1837 (Procter and Gamble, 2008). After a hundred and seventy-one years P&G has grown to over one hundred household brands in over eighty countries (Markels 2006). Their products range from air fresheners to prescription drugs. However, as P&G headed into the twenty-first century they announced that they would not be meeting their 1st quarter earnings forecast [Lafley, 2003]. Revenue margins were dropping and P&G was quickly losing market share to Kimberly Clark and Johnson & Johnson. After missed earnings P&G’s stock price fell from $59.18 to $26.50 between January 2000 and March 2000 (PG). Upset, the board of directors pressured then CEO Durk Jager to resign after a lack luster attempt at turning P&G around and replaced him A.G Lafley, an unproven CEO, whom analysts felt lacked the experience to give P&G a much needed clean up (Lafley, 2003).
Leonard Prescott, vice president and general manager of Weaver-Yamazaki Pharmaceutical of Japan, believed that John Higgins, his executive assistant, was losing effectiveness in representing the U.S. parent company because of an extraordinary identification with the Japanese culture.
3. Analyze BP using the five forces of competition model to determine the industries current attractiveness in terms of profits potential
Pricing. Our product is priced lower than our competitors in our industry. Even though our competitors have a different kind of product compared to us.
The purpose of this report is to compare financial reports from the two largest soft drink manufacturers in the world. The Pepsi Co. and Coca Cola have been the industry's leaders in their market since the early 1900's. I will use relevant figures to determine profitability, and break down key ratios in profitability, liquidity, and solvency. By breaking down financial statements, and converting them to percentages and ratios, comparisons can be made between competitors regardless of size.
...re chances of growth and development for the company which is clearly understood through the research done on the Ansoff’s matrix. P&G is much ahead of its competitors and has also won many honors in terms of offering quality and innovative products. The company’s products are also sold by wide variety of retailers around the world and also through many e stores that sells the product online. Finally the company has also got more expansion opportunities which is clearly understood through the Yips model of Internationalization. As the company continues to acquire international brands over the years and succeeds in offering quality and innovative based products to the people all over the world it tend to give a much better completion to its competitors and of course get a wider market share making its competitors give a tough time in the industry.
Relationships have been in place with two main groups in Singapore long before Proctor and Gamble ever decided to build a plant. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering are the two main groups they have been involved with. Since Proctor and Gamble built these relationships before building a plant in Singapore they have thus established a strategic alliance with Singapore. The Economic Development Board and A*Star’s Institute for Materials Research and Engineering have come together with Proctor and Gamble to share resources and complete a project. Proctor and Gamble benefit from setting up a strategic alliance with A*Star by getting the privilege of looking at IMRE’s innovative research (Moneycontrol.com, 2008). In return for this preferential treatment, P&G shares its new innovations with A*Star’s IMRE (Moneycontrol.com, 2008).