Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Morality of different kinds
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The research conducted by Paul Zak about trust, morality, and oxytocin was very enlightening as well as, entertaining to watch the video. Watching the video first made reading his article easier to understand and follow. His research suggests that oxytocin is a moral molecule that makes people moral and trustworthy. The research conducted was very convincing and provides several different experiments to support the claim.
Paul Zak describes Oxytocin (OT) as a molecule found in only mammals, and in rodents it was known to make mothers care for their offspring. In humans it is known to facilitate birth and breastfeeding in women and released by both sexes during sex. OT is produced in the brain and in the blood. Paul calls it a trust molecule or moral molecule. The textbook definition of oxytocin is “A hormone, released from the posterior pituitary that triggers milk letdown in the nursing female” (Breedlove, 2013, pg. 138). Trust according to Paul is indispensable in relationships and a key factor in economics and politics because without it our society would breakdown. He believes that you cannot have morality without trustworthiness, and that trustworthy people are more prosperous. These definitions are supported by research, as well as, personal experiences and beliefs.
Paul Zak’s research included several different experiments: laboratory, real life experiments, and social media experiments. Research of a large body of animals indicated that OT is a contributing factor to understanding why people trust. Further research was conducted on rodents, which began in the late 1970’s. This research discovered that OT and arginine vasopressin molecules promoted affiliation with others. The animal work indicated that OT in some ways fa...
... middle of paper ...
...ect results to the role of oxytocin and how this molecule can be labeled as the morality molecule. Other possibilities and explanations need to be researched to be ruled out to conclude and support the function of OT. There is a wealth of research that has been done over the past few years and many different scientist have introduced the idea that oxytocin is a moral molecule that make people more trustworthy and allows people to be morally right. With any research there is always negativity and scrutiny that comes along with it. Most of the research found supports that OT is in fact molecule and being injected with OT or having higher levels of OT can be linked to causing people to do morally and trustworthy things. I agree with the definitions provided, and the measures of research constructed, but still believe there are other explanations not properly explored.
Schacter, D. L., Gilbert, D. T., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Psychology. (2nd ed., p. 600). New York: Worth Pub.
In the nonfiction book Social:Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect by Matthew D. Lieberman, the author discusses research with neuroscience relating to how strongly humans yearn to connect with one another. The book includes studies about very relevant topics such as how praise and positive feedback heavily impact one’s feelings and opinions of themselves. The author also relates evidence in the book to underlying feelings that human beings have such as selfishness and the need to please others. By using specific examples and experiences that are both personal and research based, he is able to illustrate how people see themselves personally, others around them, and how they are able to make a connection between the two. Lieberman is a professor
Evil has a direct link to oxytocin being released into the brain. (Zak 1) The 5% that don’t share many traits with psychopaths. (Zak 1) Not all evil people don't have the ability to release oxytocin. People who release oxytocin when given a positive signal tend to be “normal people. 95% of people release oxytocin when given a positive social signal. (Zak 1) Most people are not evil, the number may
Human morality could have clearly grown out of primate sociality. Though being morally aware may be a uniquely human trait, many species such as primates, dogs and ants, all known for living in a group, have been known to exhibit pre-moral sentiments. Concepts such as attachment, bonding, empathy, and
Morality, which is one’s general standards about right and wrong behavior, also includes prosocial behavior and other traits such as honesty, fairness, and concern about other people’s rights and welfare (Omrod, 2014). Both morality and prosocial behavior involve multiple parts of the brain, emotions and complex reasoning abilities. Some age-typical characteristics for preschool aged children include, some understanding that behaviors causing physical or psychological harm are morally wrong, a sense of guilt and shame about misbehaviors that cause harm to others, also display empathy and sympathy, and children at this age also show an appreciation for the need to be fair.
Vasopressin has long been implicated in the memory of faces and is thus useful for research on recall and recognition of faces. Because of the role vasopressin plays in relationships, it is important to consider its value in affecting romantic relationships and perception of romantic partner's faces. In a study by Thompson and colleagues (2004) researchers looked at how vasopressin administration affects responses to happy, angry and neutral faces in terms of attention, and arousal and physiological measures like corrugator supercilii electromyograms (EMG), heart rate and skin conductance (Thompson, Gupta, Miller, Mills, & Orr, 2004). This was based on previous experiments with the effect of oxytocin on facial perception. Neutral faces were found to elicit higher responses in the EMG. They argued that because the faces were ambiguous having been taken from Paul Ekman's series of faces, vasopressin may have lead participants to view those neutral faces in a more aggressive way causing that increased EMG response. This study demonstrates that there is a link between vasopressin and facial recognition responses and further studies have added on to this. In a follow up study in 2006, they looked at vasopressin effects on perception of friendliness for both men and women on pictures of same sex faces. They found that the results of vasopressin depended on the gender as women were friendlier when presented with same sex faces (Thompson, George, Walton, Orr, & Benson, 2006). Interestingly, they did not repeat the study to see the effect of vasopressin between both sexes seeing opposite sex pictures. In men, however, the familiarity of the romantic partner when combined with insecurity would decrease the per...
We are intrinsically social species and as a result, we have various chemical balances that cause us to feel and
Gamer, M., Zurowski, B., & Buchel, C. (2010). Different amygdala subregions mediate valence-related and attentional effects of oxytocin in humans. PNAS, 107(20), 9400-9405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000985107
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
Gurtman, M. B. (1992b). Trust, distrust, and interpersonal problems: A circumplex analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 989-1002.
Some years ago a number of psychologists hypothesized that the presence of fear will lead to an individual to want to associate with other persons. In a certain experiment, some subjects were casually divided into two diverse groups. The high fear group was told that in the event of the experiment they could be getting very painful electric shocks. The low fear group on the other hand was told that the received shock would be just like a tender touch. Both of the groups were asked whether they preferred to wait alone or have company of others who were also being shocked. When a suggestively larger percentage of the subjects of high fear group asked to have company, the researchers settled that high fear leads to an increase in the desire to associate with others.
Subsequently, since discovering that both biological and sociological aspects both play a part in human behavior, studies began to formulate to see whether nature or nurture held a stronger influence. Two of the main studies done were the family and twin studies. Family studies are defined as “studies that examine the clustering of criminality in a given family” (Schram, P. J., & Tibbetts, S. G.). One of the families that was studied was the Kallikak family by H. H. Goddard. Through this study they found criminality is more common in some Neurotransmitters are chemicals in the brain and body that help transmit electric signals from one neuron to other neurons in the body.
Batson, D., Thompson, E. (2001). Why Don't Moral People Act Morally?. Current Directions in Psychological.10 (1), 54-57.
The writer F. Cushman suggests there are two different states of mind when it comes to morality. One is repeating the past or remembering the outcome of an event, second is the area you place yourself within, the people you socialize with and surroundings around you. Dalton from the outside was a heartless killing machine, but from the inner picture he was a kind person who chose not to hurt people. Assuming Dalton and the other robbers have a close relationship showing the same outlook and same experiences as the “kind hearted” Dalton. Another study featured in Atlantic Monthly, The Biologic Basis of
For years, the matter of morality has been a widespread topic of discussion, debating whether it is a product of our chemical composition or our free will. Before I get started, I will provide you with what I believe morality exactly is. Ethics is a “code of conduct,” much like a University’s student handbook, but applied to the expected morality of a larger group or society. Morals are how individuals choose to interpret and follow such code. Just as a student may not always act in complete obedience with the student handbook, humans also deviate from their ethical codes of conduct. Therefore, morals are the set of a person’s specific values and opinions formed by their interpretation of their society’s code of ethics. With this version of the meaning of morality, I believe that individual free-will and the neurological hardwiring in which we are born with both significantly influence the development of our mature human morality due to a variety of factors including: human brain development, differences in our upbringing and education, which give rise to disparities in matters such as what is considered right or wrong, decision-making processes, and our ultimate behavioral choices, and lastly, because morality cannot exist if based solely on human nature, it must also involve our own self-determination. My position that morality is not the product of one side of the debate or the other, but rather arises through the integration of both components, allows for a complete demonstration of morality in its entirety. In this system, the ambiguities present in the one-sided arguments are removed, making it easy to link any individual’s action to their personal moral accountability.