Othello Act 2 Analysis

512 Words2 Pages

In the initial two acts, crucial judgments are made to dispense the just nature of certain events. The justice represented in Act 1 is very similar to that in Act 2, as they both follow the judgmental likings of Othello. Within Brabantio's attempt to prove Othello’s actions unjust, Othello is victimized as the criminal of the case. Just like Othello, Cassio is victimized in Act 2, when Iago illustrates that he and the others “entreats his pause”, as Cassio was in “rage strike” (2.3.210) (2.3.224). In both cases, some dishonesty occurs, as Brabantio says that Othello “corrupted [Desdemona] / By spells and medicines bought of mountebanks”, and Iago fails to say that he was the one who got Cassio drunk and sent Roderigo to provoke him (1.3.60-61). Through these lies and intentional omissions, Brabantio and Iago are attempting to sway the “judge” into believing that their view is just. The difference is, however, that one succeeds at doing this while the other fails. In Brabantio’s …show more content…

This naivety allows Iago’s plan to succeed and results in the unjust nature of Othello’s decision. Had Othello done what the Duke did, in which case he would have waited to hear Casio’s side of the story, his decision may have been more just. This is also the first event that Othello shows that he is having trouble with controlling his emotion, by saying, “Now by heaven / My blood begins my safer guides to rule, / And passion having my best judgment collied” (2.3.185-187). This event foreshadows the fact that Iago’s future plans will succeed, causing Othello to make several other unjust decisions; whether it be due to his emotions and/or his naivety. Othello’s naivety and use of emotions negatively correlate with the justness of his decisions. The less control he has over his emotions and the more trustworthy he becomes, the easier it will be for Iago to formulate successful steps in revenging

More about Othello Act 2 Analysis

Open Document