Ordinal Level Variance

1182 Words3 Pages

“The standard deviation of a random sample is defined as the square root of the sample variance, which is the mean” (Sarkar & Rashid p.45, 2017). Because the variance is often tough to interpret, the standard deviation is used because it is easier to understand (Walker, 2009). The standard deviation makes it easier to understand by putting the dispersion in the same units as the distribution (Walker, 2009). To find the standard deviation, you would calculate the square root of the variance (Walker, 2009). Calculating the standard deviation can be both easy and hard (Walker, 2009). If you know what the variance is, like I said above, you simply take the square root of the variance, but if the variance is no known you must first find the variance …show more content…

The standard deviation is also used to show how the normal curve is discussed and divided in inferential analysis (Walker, 2009). “The index of dispersion is another measure of dispersion for normal and partially ordered ordinal variables” (Walker p.126, 2009). The index of dispersion is not usually used when measuring data, and there are not that many ways to measure nominal and ordinal level data, and people tend to use the variance and standard deviation which results in their findings being wrong (Walker, 2009). In the text it shows how the index of dispersion is used to measure and calculate nominal level data (Walker, 2009). The equation used to calculate the index of dispersion is put into a ratio form, with the actual number of data on the top and the maximum number of the data on the bottom (Walker, 2009) As an example, the text has a table with data about college attendance showing that two people were college graduates, eight people had some college, and five people had not attended college at all, bringing the maximum number of the data to fifteen (Walker, 2009). You would then take the data provided in this table and put it all through the formula to find the index of dispersion (Walker, …show more content…

I believe the best measure of dispersion to use would be the range because the range is best used with nominal level data, and since there is not much need for measurement between the different types of housing, I believe that this falls into the nominal category (Walker, 2009). Another reason I think the range would suit this category is because of the small amount of data provided (Walker, 2009). I am not sure that it is worth putting this small amount of data into formulas and calculating it. There are only 6 categories of information and they only live in one or the other type of housing (Walker, 2009). For the number of arrests, the standard deviation is 1.567, the variance is 2.455, and the range is 24 (Walker, 2009). I believe the best measure of dispersion for the number if times that someone has been arrested would the index of dispersion (Walker, 2009). The index of dispersion usually used with ordinal level data, and I believe that the data provided for the number of times someone has been arrested falls into the category of ordinal level data (Walker,

Open Document