On Kafka's Metamorphosis

1647 Words4 Pages

Through Gregor’s transformation in The Metamorphosis, Franz Kafka allows the reader to explore the meaning of identity. By pulling in Marx’s own theories on capitalism and how it affects the working class’s identity, the reader is able to gain insight on the question of identity that the novel poses. Gregor’s metamorphosis resembles Marx’s beliefs on how identity is affected by capitalism through the alienation Gegor experiences, as well as the cause of his death and the form that his metamorphosis gives him. Joshua Fenlon’s criticism, “On Kafka’s The Metamorphosis”, explores the insect form that Gregor transforms into, and what it means through a Marxist and Darwinist lens, as during this time period, the boundaries between humans and animals …show more content…

In the beginning, Gregor’s alienation comes from his work and his resentment towards it. Marx in another piece, Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, explains that alienation felt form work is due to the separation of their labor because of their hatred towards their work and the fact that they work only to benefit their society with no benefit towards themselves. Some resentment comes from the fact that, "The worker exists as a worker only when he exists for himself as capital; and he exists as capital only when some capital exists for him” (“Marx, Antithesis of Capital and Labor. Landed Property and Capital”). In other words, the workers existence is derived from the existence of capital, an object that the worker inherently resents. The familial alienation, while still apparent in the beginning of the novel, is especially prominent towards the end. The familial alienation before Gregor’s transformation is ultimately a byproduct of capitalism, as his family sees him as the provider and the person responsible of repaying the debt, but little else. Gregor acknowledges this on page 4 by saying, “If I didn’t hold back for my parents’ sake, I would have quit long ago…” (Kafka, the Metamorphosis). However, Gregor loses the main thing that holds him to his family after his transformation. Due to his metamorphosis, Gregor can no longer be the …show more content…

Marx brings up the idea of starvation within his “Antithesis of Capital and Labor. Landed Property and Capital” by relating it to the loss of humanism through capital. Marx states, “…but since he has no existence as a human being but only as a worker, he can go and bury himself, starve himself…” (Marx, “Antithesis of Capital and Labor. Landed Property and Capital”). The obvious occurrence of starvation is Gregor at the end of the novel. By the time Gregor was finally free of his job, his existence as a human being was, or almost was, non-existent. Due to this, Gregor no longer had a reason to live and thus starved- evident by the description of being paper thin, as well as mentioning earlier in the morning that he didn’t consciously eat but rather took a bite of food when he walked by it. The beginning of the process of starvation is seen within his mother, sister, and father. The beginning of the novel describes his family’s breakfast as being “…laid out lavishly on the table…” (Kafka 12), leading the reader to infer that they ate well and ate plenty. At this point of the novel, his family were not workers and thus had purpose as human beings and had no reason to resent their existence. However, as time progresses, his mother and sister are described as “…pleading in vain with one of the others to eat and getting no answer except, ‘Thanks, I’ve had enough,’ or something similar.” (Kafka,

Open Document