Omnivore's Dilemma Pollen Summary

671 Words2 Pages

What's Really On My Plate? Think about your last meal. Now ask yourself questions. Where did that food come from? How is it affecting my body? What is the impact on the environment? These questions are most likely not the first questions you ask yourself before eating a delicious chicken, but should they be? In the Omnivore's Dilemma, the author Michael Pollen ponders these questions. Pollen argues that people don't have enough understanding from where our food comes. First, he shows that consumers can buy just about any food from anywhere in the globe. Second, he shares the many marketing influences the food industry aims towards consumers. Lastly, he explains that Americans have no food traditions or cultures on which they can fall. All …show more content…

By accepting misguided information about the food that is being purchased from the marketers, consumers are letting the food industry shape buying patterns, even when it is not to their benefit. Pollan supports this claim when he writes, “With all the variety and constant stream of messages from the food industry and media, how can we make up our minds” (86). Pollan’s quote elaborates on how the the constant stream of messages affects what Americans put into their bodies. Last, Americans have no food traditions or universal culture on which they can fall. In many countries, there are food customs that are passed from one generation to the next. Because America is a melting pot of cultures, it does not have a single food custom that we all share. Without the guidance of a single food culture, Americans find themselves lost on which food nourishes and which harm. Pollan gives an example of the French benefiting from food customs. “Take the French, for example. They eat by and large as they have for generations….Yet their rates of heart disease and obesity are lower than the health-crazy Americans’. How can that be? Maybe because how we eat is just as important as what we eat”

Open Document