Oj Simpson Trial Of The Century

1429 Words3 Pages

Trial of the century is an idiomatic phrase used to describe certain well-known court cases, especially of the 20th century. One of the most popular cases that fits this definition is the Orenthal James Simpson case.This case was about the murder of O.J Simpson’s ex wife Nicole Simpson and her boyfriend Ron Goldman’s murder, and the famous football player, movie star, and the suspected murderer O.J Simpson.This case led the whole country to be drawn to their T.V to watch the case day by day. It caused many family, friends, and the nation to split between O.J’s innocence or guilt. Both of the sides of this case had ample evidence that can prove O.J innocent or guilty, some being he wasn't home at the time, his glove, his abuse allegations, …show more content…

As time began to shine throughout the case, the prosecution continuously brought up Simpson past. Which, this caused the media or whoever got the chance to interview Simpson to bring the touchy subject up. "As things got heated, I just remember Nicole fell and hurt herself and this guy kind of got into a karate thing. And I said, 'Well, you think you can kick my ass?' And I remember I grabbed the knife -- I do remember that portion, taking a knife from Charlie -- and to be honest after that I don't remember, except I'm standing there and there's all kind of stuff around and ..." he said, his voice trailing off” (Artley). As Simpson continually admitted to the abuse allegations, more murder speculations began to rise, that if he couldn't control his anger at Nicole for being seen talking to a man, he definitely couldn't stand that she was dating Ron Goldman. "I threw her out and I really threw her out with no concern for her well-being. I mean, she got physical with me and obviously I'm bigger, I got more physical with her, which I shouldn't have done, historically I just leave," Simpson said …show more content…

“Officers discovered blood both on the door of the suspect’s Ford Bronco, and also droplets leading into his house. Inside, a pair of bloodied socks were discovered, blood that was later matched to Nicole” (Reed). “The general processing of the scene was sloppy, with items of evidence never entering the chain of custody, photographs being taken without scales for reference, bloody police shoe prints littering the scene and even evidence not ever being collected, most notably a bloodied fingerprint found on the gateway of the house.” (Reed). This evidence contradicts Simpsons defense story that he was gone throughout the weekend of the murders, but as his blood was shown through the crime scene, many were confused as to what to believe. “A blood sample taken from OJ was allegedly carried around in the pocket of an investigator for hours after collection, rather than being immediately submitted as evidence and preserved. Furthermore, 1.5mL of this blood sample was supposedly lost, leading to claims of planted evidence and incrimination” (Reed). In this case, many speculated that due to Simpsons overpowering wealth and fame, that he might have bribed the evidence team (Reed). As the case slowly began to close with many evidence for and against Simpson, it was very tough for jurors to come to the conclusion of Simpsons innocence or

Open Document