“Of Course you cannot know a man completely, his character, his principles, sense of judgment, not till he’s shown his colors, ruling the people, making laws. Experience, there’s the test” (Sophocles 67) Readers of Antigone and Oedipus Rex are encouraged to understand the protagonists Creon and Oedipus and in doing so are encouraged to compare and contrast the charecters. Which begs the question, which of the two Theban rulers was more effective? The answer is Oedipus. Oedipus is the stronger leader in Sophocles’ Oedipus Rex & Antigone because he holds the complete respect and admiration of his people and nobility, actively attempts to solve his people’s problems, and is overall more experienced and qualified to rule Thebes than Creon. The core of any great leader is the relationship they share with their people. Oedipus was a stronger ruler because his people …show more content…
Oedipus’ relationship with his people fits the Machiavellian standard articulated in his work The Prince “is it better to be loved more than feared, or feared more than loved? The reply is, that one ought to be both feared and loved” (Machiavelli 63). Oedipus achieves this respect through his triumph over the sphinx and maintains it with a stern rule built around action. His acts of heroism lead to the admiration of his people, who have now become dependent on his rule. The priest’s first lines of dialogue from Oedipus the King serve as a strong representation of how the Thebans view Oedipus “Oh Oedipus, king of the land, our greatest power! You see us before you now, men of all ages clinging to your altars” (Sophocles 160), needless to say they admire him. It can be argued that Creon also has the respect of his people, although his methods of achieving it may differ from that of Oedipus. Some might claim that fear is all that is needed to
Oedipus Rex and Antigone & nbsp; There is no curse in the house of Oedipus. Because of the many terrible things that happen to the members of Oedipus's family, a reader might be led to believe that there is such a curse. However, if that person examines the stories of Oedipus Rex and Antigone more closely, he or she will find that the reason so many tragedies happened to Oedipus's family is not because of some curse, but rather because of one common thread. Each person in the line of Oedipus tries to defy authority in one way or another.
Aristoteles’s “Theory of Tragedy” suggests that the tragic flaw in Sophocles’ play Oedipus is the King’s “self-destructive actions taken in blindness,” but a worse flaw is his arrogance. There are a few opposing views that stray from Oedipus being fully arrogant. First is that he took actions to save himself from further pain. Second, by putting himself in charge was the right thing to do as the leader of his people. Third, Oedipus never tried to outwit the gods but used the prophecy as a warning to leave Corinth.
The people of Thebes liked their ruler, and he in turn ruled over them in a good and just way, trying to help them in their times of need. Aristotle believed that good in man existed in doing his job well. A good carpenter was one who worked with his wood and built things as best as possible; a good ruler presided over his people justly. Oedipus was a go...
Oedipus is shown to be a well-liked and trusted king among all his townspeople. Solving the riddle of the Sphinx and saving Thebes brought him great fame and popularity. When time came to save the town from Laios’ killer, Oedipus relied much on his intellect. He searched for information about the night of the murder from Creon and Teiresias, but as he learned more details, Oedipus realized not only that he was the killer but also that he married his mother. Throughout his inquiry he believed he was doing good for his people as well as himself, but eventually it brought him shame. Oedipus was humiliated and disgusted and stated, “…kill me; or hurl me into the sea, away from men’s eyes for ever(p882, 183).'; Oedipus’ wanted to be isolated from the people of Thebes because all his respect and fame was destroyed by his fate.
A detective story is a genre of fiction in which a person attempts to solve a crime. The detective may be a professional or an amateur, and generally has nothing to gain from solving the crime. However in Sophocles’ “Oedipus the King”, the main character Oedipus is not only determined to solve a crime, but he is also in pursuit to find his own identity. This is similar to Arthur Conan Doyle’s “A Scandal in Bohemia” where Sherlock Holmes has been hired to work as a detective in return for monetary compensation. Both situations enable Oedipus and Sherlock to gain from unraveling the mysteries that sweep their towns hence making these stories different from most detective stories.
The king was someone who the people of Thebes turned to when they needed help, "find us strength, rescue!" p. 161. Oedipus had set himself high social expectations after helping free Thebes "from the sphinx". Oedipus was admired as being "best of men" p. 161, and therefore socially the citizens would have expected him to help them when they needed it. Oedipus was kinder to the citizens and more open with them than was generally expected from a king, "my children" p. 162. He spoke to them directly and not through a messenger, showing the closeness between the people and their king, "Here I am myself..." p. 159.
From the opening dialogue we sense the character of Oedipus. When confronted by his subjects praying for relief of the plague he reacts kingly and graciously, saying, “I am king, I had to come....How can I help?...Ask me anything. Anything at all.” He obviously cares for the people in his kingdom, but he goes on to say how he pities “these poor shattered people of [his].” The pity he feels is rooted not only in his love and sympathy, but his arrogance as well. Perhaps this attitude is duly deserved, for Oedipus had solved the Sphinx’s riddle, an apparently heroic feat, and was seen to be “greater than any man”, but the leader that he had become still possessed the hubristic tendencies which doomed him from the time he fled Corinth.
Oedipus the King conveys many lessons that are relevant to people living today despite the fact that it was written by Sophocles twenty four centuries ago. Oedipus is a child destined to kill his father and marry his mother. During his life, he makes many mistakes trying to avoid his fate. These mistakes teach us about the nature of humans under certain circumstances. Oedipus possesses personality traits which causes him to make wrong decisions. Attributes like arrogance and his inability to make calm decisions in certain scenarios due to his anger causes his downfall. Oedipus’ excessive pride, like many people today, was an important factor that brought him grief. Oedipus’ lack of patience caused him to make hasty decisions which lead him to his greatest agony. Oedipus’ massive ego turned into excessive vanity, this was the first step to his downfall. Oedipus talks to Creon about the murderer of Laius. He declares, “Then I’ll go back and drag that shadowed past to light… but by myself and for myself I’ll break this plague” (Sophocles, 11). Oedipus is saying that he will be the on...
Sophocles never explicitly explains whose views on leadership are the best although he uses the outcomes of the characters as a way to express how he views leadership. This being said, many of his ideas are transferred into other characters’ opinions which means Sophocles’ ideal leader is a mixture of many characters’ opinions. As Oedipus cannot see his hamartia and is blind from his mistake, it is clear that Sophocles thinks that a successful leader needs to note his own faults. Additionally, as Tiresias makes a point in Antigone that a kind needs to also find a solution to his faults it is clear that Sophocles is expanding on his point by saying that the fault needs to be recognized as well as solved to rule properly. However, through Oedipus, Sophocles shows his opinion towards openness. Sophocles clearly believes that information should be made public and that a rulers heart should be open and empathetic to their people. As Oedipus is loved in the opening of his play it is clear his actions prior to his mistakes are seen as something to mimic. Although, as the play unfolds his character becomes plagued by his hamartia and Sophocles uses this to show what a leader should not do. Since his character becomes increasingly blind to his hamartia so is his blindness towards how to lead; Oedipus’ egotistical approach that emerges shows how Sophocles believes a ruler
Brittnne Bennett Bennett 1Mrs. BardEnglish Honors25 January 2014The cursed journey of Oedipus By conducting a thorough reading of Sophocles play Oedipus the king, one will easily view Oedipus as caring, getting ahead of himself, and seemingly on a personal journey. In the process of this journey you come to, and understanding that there is more to this apologue than it appears. Due to the fact that, Oedipus goes through a life changing journey; Between his biological family, people who he considered his family, and himself. The decision that he chooses to make will either bring him peace or misery. The story commences with a toxic plague tormenting the city of Thebes. The Priest approaches Oedipus his king, and begs him to help cease this curse. Being a considerate and understanding king who loves his people Oedipus was already one step ahead. At that point Oedipus had sent his brother-in-law Creon to talk to the god Apollo, to grasp and understand as to why this was happening to his people. In return, Creon had suggested to Oedipus that he talks to Tiresias, "The man who sees most eye to eye with Lord Apollo." (Will 17) In doing so, it doesn't end well as Oedipus felt betrayed by his brother-in-law; for sending a false prophet. Leading him to accuse Creon of wanting to steal the throne. As this predicament rises the chorus leader state's that " Quick decisions are not the safest." (Will 35)
Creon, who is Iocasta’s brother, claims in Oedipus the King that he does not wish to have the power and responsibility of being king. Towards the beginning of Oedipus the King, Oedipus has announced that Creon is to be banished from Thebes. Oedipus was exiling Creon because he said that Creon and Tiresias were trying to overthrow his power. Creon, being innocent of these accusations says that he has no desire to be king. He says, “Would any sane man prefer power, with al a king’s anxieties, To that same power and the grace of sleep? Certainly not I. I have never longed for the king’s power – only his rights.” (Oedipus, Scene II, L68-71) Oedipus, Creon, and Iocasta had the same amount of power in Thebes. The only difference was that Oedipus was the king. Creon said he was perfectly content with having the power without all the worries. Oedipus had the power but also had the people to worry about, Creon just had the power. By the end of Oedipus the King, it is revealed that Oedipus had killed the former King Laius and Iocasta is found dead. Creon decides to exile Oedipus, revealing that he may actually want to be king.
Creon does not learn a lesson from Oedipus' accusatory behavior. Instead he adapts this bad personality trait. Throughout Antigone, he accuses everyone who tries to give him advice of betraying him. Whereas, in Oedipus, he is falsely accused by Oedipus of trying to take over the throne. This paper will compare and contrast his behavior and evaluate if he learned anything from one play to the next.
In OC, Creon still retains some respect for divine prophecies. These have after all motivated his desire to return Oedipus to Thebes. Antigone reveals the ultimate extent to which Creon's character deteriorates. His transformation completes itself; he has become an unreasonable tyrant. Creon can no longer be called a king. He has become a despot.
Oedipus’ pride, strung from his own heroic qualities, is one factor that ruined him. A hero prizes above all else his honor and the excellence of his life. When his honor is at stake, all other considerations become irrelevant. The hero "valued strength and skill, courage and determination, for these attributes enabled the person who possessed them to achieve glory and honor, both in his lifetime and after he died" (Rosenburg 38). Oedipus was certainly a hero who was exceptionally intelligent though one can argue that killing four men at Phokis single-handedly more than qualified him as a physical force of reckoning. He obviously knew his heroic status when he greeted the supplicating citizens of Thebes before the palace doors saying, "I would not have you speak through messengers, and therefore I have come myself to hear you - I, Oedipus, who bear the famous name"(Sophocles 1088). Oedipus is "guilty of Hubris- that is, that he is too sure of himself, too confident in his own powers [and] a little undermindful of the gods" (Brooks 573).
In this paper I will be making 3 major points about Creon. First I will explain the role Creon plays in this drama. Next I will explain some of the values Creon represents in this story. And for the last I will be examining how essential Creon is to the way this situation plays itself out.