Nozick's Argument For The Creation Of Political States

1479 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Adam Smith views on economic thought

Identifications
Nozick= This passage is advocating that your labor is your own, and by taking the earnings of your labor through taxation, it is morally wrong to do so. This is part of Nozick’s bigger argument for a minimalist state.
Aristotle= This passage is about the way in which men are dependent upon one another. Men are not naturally self sufficient and they have needs which they rely on others to fill. This goes to Aristotle's larger idea of man's need for the creation of a political state.
Adam Smith= This passage is about how self interest is an inherent good. For example, a baker will meet the customers desires not because he cares about the customer but because that will be the best way to sell his product. This quote fits into …show more content…

The perception is very wide held among our society that the wealth does not belong to the elite but it belongs to the people. This perception will only get worse as we become more connected.

2) Tocqueville believes that envy arises in democratic conditions. This envy is not the same as jealousy, but it is the act of perceiving any inequality or difference as unjust. This envy seeks to remove any distinction between two beings. Its arises in democratic conditions particular ours, because our nation's values and history are based on equality and the fight for equality. Tocqueville believes that we Americans are in relentless pursuit of equality which is a form of envy in itself.

The negative effects touch all parts of Americans law, religion, industry. For law, many people will accept injust equality over justice. For religion many people criticize or impede on one's religious beliefs in the name of equality. Arguably the most negative effects of equality can lie in industry because American capitalism is based on competition where there are winners and losers and everyone is not

Show More
Related

  • Taxes By Soame Jenyns Summary

    1254 Words  | 3 Pages

    Taxes. We hate to love them and love to hate them. The mere mention of the word can stir heated debates and has done so for centuries. None were more prevalent than during colonial times. During this time, with the British Parliament on one side and the colonists on the other, both argued, either verbally or in written text, about which side did or did not have the right to tax the colonies. Soame Jenyns was one of these men who sided with the mother country in the tax debate.

    Read More

  • Tocqueville´s Faults of Democracy in America

    846 Words  | 2 Pages

    Tocqueville seems to like democracy in its ideal form. However, nothing can be perfect and thus America is not a perfect democracy. Tocqueville found numerous problems with democracy and the influence it had on the populace. These problems range from their distrust of dogmatic beliefs to the imperfect equality that is in place in America. He also found the effects of these problems to be quite problematic as well. For instance, individualism, an effect of equality, is very problematic to democracy. Tocqueville enjoys considering America as an experiment in democracy, but does not find it to be faultless.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Locke And Tocqueville

    1499 Words  | 3 Pages

    Tocqueville (rather bizarrely in retrospect) conceived of America as having “an almost complete equality of conditions”. While in respect to the French alone, Tocqueville argues, “the taste and the idea of freedom began to exist and to be developed only at the time when social conditions were tending to equality and as a consequence of that very equality.” Tocqueville draws the first stirrings of equality to the “political power of the clergy,” which upon being consolidated began to spread and upon its ranks to “all classes, to rich and poor, commoner, and noble.” Thus “through the Church, equality penetrates into the government, and he who as a serf must have vegetated in perpetual bondage could, as a priest, take his place in the midst of nobles, and would often sit above kings.” Tocqueville continues to trace the ascent of equality and descent of aristocracy to the financial demise of kings “ruining themselves by their great enterprises; the nobles exhausting their resources by private wars, [while] the lower orders enriching themselves by commerce”. And with the advent and spread of education, the “value attached to high birth declines just as fast as new avenues to power are

    Read More

  • Wealth Inequality In America

    2137 Words  | 5 Pages

    The distribution of wealth by country is an amazing thing to look at (see table 3). The United States comes clearly on top with 41.6% of the wealth across the world, with the next closest being China at 10%. This shows that there is plenty of wealth to go around in the United States; we just don’t equally distribute it. The Gini Coefficient is the best way the world economy can represent the income distribution of a nation’s citizens. The United States ranks well below any other first world country (See table 2) This is an embarrassment to our country. We are a wealthy and successful country, yet we have a bigger gap between the wealthy and poor than any other country that compares to

    Read More

  • The Enlightenment and a Desire for a Free Market

    1442 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Adam Smith." Adam Smith. Library of Economics and Liberty, 2008. Web. 4 Feb. 2011. .

    Read More

  • The Views Of Alexis De Tocqueville And Karl Marx

    959 Words  | 2 Pages

    De Tocqueville’s argument was between equality versus individualism. He describes individualism as “a calm and considered feeling which disposes each citizen to isolate himself from the mass of his fellows and withdraw into the circle of family and friends” (De Tocqueville, 506). His perspective was that individualism empowers people to become competent but also strengthens and reassures society to work with the others in the community to magnify the possibilities for humans. As stated by Professor Veugelers “De Tocqueville happened to see that the inequality between the rich and the poor became more restricted, and thought that at some point the gap will close.”

    Read More

  • Animal Farm Comparison

    1443 Words  | 3 Pages

    Adam Smith once said, “No society can surely be flourishing and happy, of which the far

    Read More

  • Who Rules America: Wealth Distribution

    616 Words  | 2 Pages

    Time and time again we hear politicians and office holders preach the need for a powerful middle-class. You may then be surprised to hear that “about 82% of America’s net worth belongs to the top 20%, the next 80% of people only own about 18% of America’s wealth” (UCSC). Some may argue that this disproportion is the beauty of capitalism, the chance to create an empire. I argue that the proportions are simply unfair. Why is it that “ the average CEO makes 350X as much as his/her employee” (UCSC)?

    Read More

  • Wealth in America

    899 Words  | 2 Pages

    As the old saying goes, money is power. As the statistics show, some people have an insane amount of money, yet their fellow countrymen have close to nothing. In a struggling economy, unfair distribution of wealth can create real problems and unimaginable hardships for some people. For example, millions of people pay $2 for a bottle of designer water, while millions more live on less than $2 a day. If this is to one day change, wealthy people must adopt a much more magnanimous conviction towards their money.

    Read More

  • Why The Rich Are Getting Richer And The Poor, Poorer Essay

    917 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Why the Rich are getting Richer and the Poor, Poorer” written by Robert Reich, describes as the title says, why the rich are getting richer and the poor, poorer. In Reich’s essay he delves into numerous reasons and gives examples of each. It makes one wonder if the world will continue on the path of complete economic separation between the rich and the poor.

    Read More

  • The Philosophies Of John Rawls Vs. Nozick

    792 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nozick agrees with the liberty principle proposed by Rawls, but he disagrees with the equality principle and the fashion in which resources are distributed. I believe the historical principle of distribution is one strength of Nozick’s ideas. The historical principle of distribution states that the justice of any distribution does not depend on how closely it resembles any form of an equality pattern but how the distribution came about (959). I also agree with the theory that people are entitled to anything they acquired voluntarily and anything that is transferred to them voluntarily (958). Nozick does not agree with redistribution of wealth because taking resources from one person to benefit others is not necessarily voluntary. The biggest weaknesses of Nozick’s idea of equality comes from the idea that taxation and federally funded programs would be unjust forcing everything to be owned privately. This creates the most issues because people are self-interested and the virtue of market may not create the balance which Nozick proposed. Public school systems and public roads being deemed illegitimate would create issues with access. Also, making taxation illegal would make it difficult to have services like a police force, fire department, court system, or penal system because they would have to be paid by the individual directly. The police and court systems could become corrupt

    Read More

  • Robert Nozick's Argument Against Utilitarianism

    936 Words  | 2 Pages

    The experience machine, proposed by a contemporary philosopher Robert Nozick struck me as very interesting when I first read it. The experience machine explores the idea of what makes people truly happy and if physically participating in the experience matters. In the pages ahead I will explain Nozick’s insight on the experiment and how he uses it as an argument against Utilitarianism. I will also explain the ideas of John Stuart Mill and his ideas of Utilitarianism, and how he would most likely be for using the machine. I will begin with John Stuart Mill a large defender of Utilitarianism. To put it simply Utilitarianism is about finding happiness by performing actions that promote

    Read More

  • Summary Of The Power Elite

    1055 Words  | 3 Pages

    People think of the members of the higher levels in terms of what they own and what they have, their possessions. The elite however are not defined only by those who have an abundance because if it were not for their stature they would not have these possessions that people speak of.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Wealth Inequality

    1189 Words  | 3 Pages

    Wealth inequality is the uneven distribution of resources in a given state or population, which can also be called the wealth gap. The sum of one’s total assets excluding the liabilities equates the person’s wealth also known as the net worth. Investments, residents, cash, real estates and everything owned by an individual are their assets.In reality, the United States is among the richest countries in the world, though a few people creating a major gap between the richest, the middle class and the poor control most of its wealth. For more than a quarter of a century, only the rich American families have shown an increase to their net worth.Thisis a worrying fact for the less fortunate in the country and calls for assessment (Baranoff, 2015).

    Read More

  • Money Is The Key To Success

    1394 Words  | 3 Pages

    Almost everybody hopes to be rich. Society believes that only the social status can define the kind of person you are. Majority of

    Read More

More about Nozick's Argument For The Creation Of Political States

Open Document