Not Just Speech

629 Words2 Pages

In this civilization, speech is not enough for society. So people write down what they want to say to show their past. Also, they can learn things from the history. If people had not written anything down from the past, we could not see whether the history was doing well or not. Also, we could not learn lessons from the blunders of the past. Moreover, why people are compelled to share themselves through writing not just speech is that to have standard way to show respectfulness to others, to make people able to conceivably imagine from verbal things, but also to make academic material more convincible.
First of all, the reason why people are compelling to share themselves through writing not just speech is that to have a standard way to show respectfulness to others who are having a different culture background. In English, writing has a fundamental structure which everyone learned. In a formally worldwide speech, the speaker must be fully prepared before they give the speech. Usually, they would write it down. That is why formal speech, like writing, also can show the respectfulness to others who are from different countries and might misunderstand the meaning of other spoken languages. According to “What's the Difference between Speech and Writing?”, the author William Bright said that spoken language has so many forms of language which is just in only one area. Nowadays, globalization must have a single written pattern which has to be verified by international and academic institutions. For example, anyone should not use spoken language in the meeting at The United Nations. Because that would show that people do not respect this meeting nor respect others. In short, when people are in the formal situation they should speak li...

... middle of paper ...

... can be permitted by others. By contrast, spoken language is constituted by memories. This is less convinced. Therefore, in educational goal, learning material which it has been improved by some powerful organizations. It is more meaningful. If people just use the things of memory to teach others, it would be weaker, not powerful to convince learners. Thus, writing makes spoken language to become more powerful, more convincing. Then learners would get the most correct in the academic content rather than fragments of memory.
In conclusion, if people shared their thoughts just through spoken language, it has no any standard. Sometimes it is harder than writing language to image. And it is more difficult than writing language to use in the academy because spoken language is an unconfirmed memory. Therefore, sharing thoughts should be through both speech and writing.

Open Document