Normalcy Argument Essay

1106 Words3 Pages

How many advertisements does the average person see in their lifetime, or even just the span of a year? It’s difficult, if not impossible, to count. Advertisements, whether they are in the forms of television commercials, pictures in magazines, or posts on social media, have become a part of everyday life for people all over the world and whether they like it or not, quite influential in their lives. It is difficult to spend a day without seeing one advertisement. These advertisements convey important messages or try to sell a product, but often times, they do more that just that. Ads sell society’s ideas of picture-perfection and flawlessness, its idea of normalcy. However, this “normalcy” is not always realistic or even normal at all. Photoshop, …show more content…

Sometimes, perfection is not a problem; altering the color of a photo or fixing a hair that is out of place is completely acceptable. However, fixing so-called imperfections or flaws in a model’s body is problematic and wrong. For example, Modcloth, a company that sells swimsuits, has vowed not to use Photoshop to “materially change” a model’s body, to add a warning label to their Photoshopped advertisements, and only publish these advertisements where young children will not see them. In the words of Amanda Oliver, “it’s worth noting that ‘materially change’ means they will not… alter individual features. Make a blue sky clearer, clean up a fly-away hair, fix a dog’s smile? A-OK…. Photoshop isn’t the problem—the responsibility lies with the company and the people behind the computer.” Photoshop is not an evil in itself. Photos can be edited without becoming unrealistic, abnormal, or overly perfect. It is not the fault of the program itself or even its developers. The person who is enhancing the shape, size, color, or other features of a model’s body should be the one held responsible for the dropping self esteem levels of people who see these

Open Document