No Country For Old Men Fate Analysis

1853 Words4 Pages

The American author Georgette Heyer once wrote “You know what I think? Fate! That's what it is fate! There's a thing that comes after a fellow: got a name, but I forgot what it is. Creeps up behind him, and puts him in the basket when he ain't expecting it.” The concept of fate is something that has plagued mankind since the advent of philosophical thinking: is existence and every action a preordained phenomenon, or does one’s actions make a difference on the outcome of his or her life? According to Cormac McCarthy’s book No Country for Old Men, and the 2007 Joel and Ethan Coen Bothers’ film translation, life, or at least the end of it, is based solely on fate, and Anton Chigurh plays that role. In both text and film, Chigurh becomes the embodiment of fate, armed with a semi-auto Remington, whose sole purpose is not only to kill those whose time is up, but to make every other character realize the futility in trying to fight their destiny. In NCOM, a store clerk, the hitman Wells, and Moss and Carla Jean, are all forced to face their destiny due to Anton Chigurh. The interactions of …show more content…

The audio aspect of this scene was simple, yet effective. Chigurh’s voice was calm and confident, it completely lacked emotion, fear, or doubt. Chigurh’s voice was not one of a madman, a murderer, or even a voice filled with ill intent. It was the voice of someone who knew the outcome of their story and knew who was going to come out on top; In other words, it was the voice of fate. Visually, The Coen Brothers’ did something subtle yet extremely effective. Throughout the conversation, the audience never sees Moss’ face directly, but they get a direct shot of Chigurh’s face. This subliminally suggests that moss is running from his fate, while fate is standing there, waiting to pass judgment on him and Carla

Open Document