Nike Vs Under Armour

993 Words2 Pages

Athletic clothing companies aggressively compete with one another to carry on their legacy and survive as a business. Consumers are constantly being persuaded by these companies to buy their brand athletic apparel. There are thousands of options, therefore the company with the all around best product often wins the sell. Nike dominates the athletic apparel market and continues, to expand its reaches. Nike’s potential to grow will allow the company to continually lead the industry, and perhaps be the greatest company ever created.
Nike Inc which was originally known as Blue Ribbon Sports was founded in 1964 by Phil Knight and Bill Bowerman (“Mathew”). Nike started off slow, however the development of new and improved training shoes was the stepping stone that began Nike’s success. In the later years, Nike opened a new platforms of shoes designed for Michael Jordan, and sponsored international sports teams which increased the company's popularity and lead to economic growth (“Mathew”). Nike’s main focus started as footwear, but now has expanded and influences the entire athletic clothing industry.
Global concern for working conditions forces industries to provide an improved work …show more content…

Adapting to the new market is something Under Armour excels at however, unfortunate endorsements hurt the company. Under Armour has been under fire due to its open support of President Trump, who is given mixed feelings by many Americans, has decreased sells, and profits. This poor execution of an “endorsement” is a prime example of how consumers protest companies for different opinions. Under Armor did grow extensively when the moisture wicking line of apparel was introduced, but competition adapted to make their own line of apparel (“Stoffel”). Although investors see potential in Under Amour, there is no doubt Nike still holds the market for strongest

More about Nike Vs Under Armour

Open Document