Negative Essay: Climate Change

1920 Words4 Pages

Eric Fisher Dianna Trang AP English III 7 April 2015 Climate Change One of the most important issues lying in our world today and in the future is climate change. Whether you’re a denier or an acceptor, several scientific studies have found that a storm is coming for us in the future, so to speak. We often ask ourselves, what are these effects we hear of? This leads us to the purpose of this paper, to show that climate change will have drastic effects across the globe. As time progresses, these effects that are constantly spoken of on national news as well as through documentaries have grown to become reality. Ever since the 19th century scientists have been arguing that the climate of the earth could be change by the emission of greenhouse …show more content…

Another effect Gonzales writes of is that cattle production and major food crop yields may be dramatically challenged, leading to the intensification of food insecurity of tens of millions of people around the globe (Para. 14). This food insecurity that will be brought to new heights will be another burden on humanity as many people will starve in the future as a result of climate change. There are some that believe the effects, however, are overstated. But even they can acknowledge the certainty of climate change and that it would have at least some sort of effect on the world as people know it today. Marco Evers, Olaf Stampf, and Gerald Traufetter of Spiegel magazine in Germany offer their opinions that adhere to the beliefs of the side that thinks that the powerful effects of climate change that are often written about are exaggerated. Evers, Stampf, and Traufetter jointly write about their thoughts in their essay “The Negative Impact of Climate Change Is Overstated.” They write of a man named Phil Jones, who was the head of the Climate Research Unit in the UK, and appear to agree with his findings that “the average temperature on Earth rose by 0.166 degrees Celsius [0.299 degrees Fahrenheit] per decade between 1975 and 1998,” and also compare him to the common climate scientist by stating that “this, according to …show more content…

Dr. Joe Romm, an overseer of the blog ClimateProgress.org, and a member of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, writes in his essay, “Climate Change Mitigation Is More Important than Adaptation”, about his opinion that changing the amount of carbon emissions is more important than the adaptation to the change in climate that scientists have been observing over the past multiple years. Romm writes that people can expect the “desertification of one third the planet and drought over half the planet, plus the loss of all inland glaciers” (Para. 9). His intention is to show that the globe’s warming will bring on a lack of rain to some areas and melt most of the world’s glaciers which if people don’t start acting against the excessive emission of carbon into the atmosphere. Romm notes that the U.S. is pumping approximately 30 billion tons of CO2 per year and that the number is rising by more than 3% annually, and that at the annual growth rate being experienced now, by the time the expected 2020 level is reached, just staying at that level for another 8 decades will demand immediate action and strong global and national measures for an entire century. Romm uses this to back up his argument that climate change is already going to be too powerful for just adapting to it in the future. Marco Visscher, a freelance journalist

Open Document