Nazi Germany as a Totalitarian State

1476 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Discuss totalitarianism

Nazi Germany as a Totalitarian State

Goebbels once said "the aim of the Nationalist Socialist Revolution

must be a totalitarian state, which will permeate all aspects of

public life"

In reality to put this into practise was a lot more difficult. From

the outside, people assume that the Nazis had brainwashed every German

citizen during their reign. By booking more closely, through Germanys

archives we can see a better picture of what Germany was really like.

Totalitarian states must have a number of things, primarily being one

main leader, government control of all aspects of life and create

committed members of state.

In 'Weimar and Nazi Germany' by John Hite and Chris Hinton, they give

us the essential features of a totalitarian regime. In order to see

how well the Nazis achieved this, it is better to go through the key

points one by one.

" A one party state, led by one powerful leader, the centre of a

personality cult"

Hitler achieved a one party state in July 1933 by banning other

opposition parties. However these opposition parties had underground

parties: the SDP had the Berlin Red Patrol and the KDP had the red

orchestra, so Hitler didn't completely get rid of his opposition. A

major area of debate about the 3rd Reich concerns the role played by

Hitler. There are two schools of thought. The traditional view is that

Hitler was the all-powerful dictator, he made all the decisions and

disciplined his followers into implementing his wishes. Hugh Trevor

Roper and Bullock back this view. The Revisionalist view is that

Hitler was weak dictator, and was not involved in the decision making

process. Other Nazis such as...

... middle of paper ...

...successful in controlling certain areas but were not successful in

everything as Historian Stephen Lee says:

" In theory the Nazi state was totalitarian in that it eradicated

institutions allowing of the formal expression of dissent and

opposition and then proceeded to use the SS and Gestapo to pick off

individual acts of anti Nazi behaviour. By and large this combined

process was successful. Yet, the fact that oppositions did develop in

such a variety of forms indicates that totalitarianism was only party

successful"

I believe this statement is true, as the evidence clearly shows.

Hitler was not the tyrant that everyone believed him to be, especially

when there is opposition to his party and their ideals. It shows that

even with all the propaganda, and control of institutions, people

cannot easily be dictated.

Show More
Related

  • How the Nazis Gained and Maintained Power in Germany

    2071 Words  | 5 Pages

    How the Nazis Gained and Maintained Power in Germany Why did no one succeed in stopping Hitler? * 37% of votes in July * Higher than any other party * Good reason for Hitler to take control and power * Hitler had learnt the only way to achieve real power was through democracy thanks to the Munich Putsch. * Hitler established a secure position very quickly once he came to power * Papen and the other Weimar politicians believed that the constitution would stop revolutionary movements. Hitler turned down the position of vice-chancellor, good move, he. wanted to become the chancellor, which would give him far more power.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Nazis and the Party of George Orwell's Nineteen Eighty-Four (1984)

    1298 Words  | 3 Pages

    The government of Nazi Germany greatly resembled the Party, the government in 1984. Both operated similarly and had similar aims. Anything either government did was an action for maintaining power. Both the Nazis and the Party maintained similar ideologies, controlled mass media, educated children in their beliefs, had a secret police force, and had forced labor camps. Both governments used each of these methods maintain power and control over the people.

    Read More

  • Totalitarian Government: Hitler and Stalin

    1102 Words  | 3 Pages

    Following the beginning of the Second World War, Adolf Hitler’s Nazi Germany and Joseph Stalin’s Soviet Union would start what would become two of the worst genocides in world history. These totalitarian governments would “welcome” people all across Europe into a new domain. A domain in which they would learn, in the utmost tragic manner, the astonishing capabilities that mankind possesses. Nazis and Soviets gradually acquired the ability to wipe millions of people from the face of the Earth. Throughout the war they would continue to kill millions of people, from both their home country and Europe. This was an effort to rid the Earth of people seen as unfit to live in their ideal society. These atrocities often went unacknowledged and forgotten by the rest of the world, leaving little hope for those who suffered. Yet optimism was not completely dead in the hearts of the few and the strong. Reading Man is Wolf to Man: Surviving the Gulag by Janusz Bardach and Survival in Auschwitz by Primo Levi help one capture this vivid sense of resistance toward the brutality of the German concentration and Soviet work camps. Both Bardach and Levi provide a commendable account of their long nightmarish experience including the impact it had on their lives and the lives of others. The willingness to survive was what drove these two men to achieve their goals and prevent their oppressors from achieving theirs. Even after surviving the camps, their mission continued on in hopes of spreading their story and preventing any future occurrence of such tragic events. “To have endurance to survive what left millions dead and millions more shattered in spirit is heroic enough. To gather the strength from that experience for a life devoted to caring for oth...

    Read More

  • The Main Opposition to the Nazi Regime

    529 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Main Opposition to the Nazi Regime Introduction - An introduction to an answer for this type of question should consist of some background information, mainly about the strength and the fear factor of the Nazi’s. Including details of how the German people were the main opposition to the Nazi regime and not any specific group. Moving on to say how there were many reasons why the Nazi’s didn’t face more opposition but not stating them yet. This section of the essay would start to delve into what was the main opposition to the Nazi regime. The people.

    Read More

  • Totalitarianism In Nazi Germany

    1028 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nazism possess the core features of totalitarianism, however has a few differences which distinguishes it. Totalitarianism, by the Friedrich-Brzezinski definition, is when the government establishes complete control over all aspects of the state,maintaining the complete control of laws and over what people can say, think and do. Nazi Germany satisfies most of this criteria, as they had a one party system without political opposition. Moreover, they had a single unchallenged leader, in Hitler, to whom the entire nation conformed to. Furthermore, the party had nearly complete control over the country, controlling what people thought through propaganda and censorship, as well as what people could do through fear and terror. However, there are

    Read More

  • Totalitarian Society In Society

    1023 Words  | 3 Pages

    During Adolf Hitler’s reign of terror in Germany, he had tried to form a totalitarian society based on hate, and in the end of it all, it did not survive. “The Government ran and censored the media. All forms of communication were liable to interference from above and could, and were, heavily censored. This removes freedom of speech, therefore enabling the government to influence popular opinion via propaganda and false news

    Read More

  • The Nazi Police State

    4098 Words  | 9 Pages

    at least another few years. So, up to 1939, I think that life was a

    Read More

  • Nazi Olympics

    2693 Words  | 6 Pages

    On 30 January 1933, the German president, Paul von Hindenburg, selected Adolf Hitler to be the head of the government. This was very unexpected. Hitler was the leader of an extreme right-wing political party, the National Socialist German Workers (Nazi) Party. Hitler sought to expand Germany with new territories and boundaries. Hitler also focused on rebuilding Germany’s military strength. In many speeches Hitler made, he spoke often about the value of “racial purity” and the dominance of the Aryan master race. The Nazi’s spread their racist beliefs in schools through textbooks, radios, new...

    Read More

  • Adolf Hitler's Oppression of the German people

    1704 Words  | 4 Pages

    Centuries later and the name Adolf Hitler still rings volumes till this present day: discussed in history books, talked about amongst intellects and commoners alike, and despised by many for years to come. Upon hearing his name many may think of all the negative things Hitler has done, but few fail to analyze just how one man created such controversy amongst a nation without being stopped. The question then lies how does a man reign over country and devastate it for years to come? Adolf Hitler, a man who excelled in persuasion and charisma was able to reign over Germany for years. Born in Austria April 20th 1889, Hitler grew up with many hardships in his life.

    Read More

  • How Did Adolf Hitler Able To Stay In Power

    872 Words  | 2 Pages

    Adolf Hitler manipulated the German state so he could create his own Totalitarian Government. Germany became desperate due to the Treaty of Versailles that ultimately took away their army, jobs and plummeted their economy. After the Weimar Republic signed the Treaty of Versailles and failed to retain the German economy, Hitler used this to exploit the needs of the German citizens and to manipulate his way into office. Hitler took advantage of three different areas of German society to achieve total control of Germany, the economy, climate of fear and propaganda. Adolf Hitler claimed the economic reform put in place by the Weimar Republic, which helps him gain the loyalty of the German people, therefore furthering his goal of a Totalitarian

    Read More

  • Did Hitler Plan To Kill The Jews

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    The goal of the Party had no evidence in the precise steps that would be used to fulfill the achievement. The vagueness of the Nazi Party’s goals is seen as a result from Hitler’s weak dictatorship, which is seen as part of the functionalist school of thought. From the Chancellor’s absence in the planning of the killings of the Jews, prominent Nazi leaders were able to assume excessively powerful positions. With regards to policy making, government inaction stemmed from Hitler’s fear of decreasing popularity through unpopular decisions. From Decoding the Holocaust, historian Draper explains that it was Hitler’s fear, which reduced his power as a leader combined with his “deference to senior leaders” and his ‘unrelenting trust to their political instincts’ was pinnacle in highlighting Hitler’s inability to effectively exercise ‘government policy making procedures’. This had in turn, left a space for high-ranking officials of the Party to have a large input into political decisions. With the officials in power over Hitler, the high-ranking officials were guided by racial ideology and on the basis or goals of “making Germany…more National Socialist” as displayed in Nazism, Fascism and the Working Class. However, the officials were not united as an organized group but rather were “focusing solely on their respective jurisdictions” exemplifying the lack of unity and the image of a chaotic Party. According to historian Mason, he expresses “It is likely a general agreement was made… to generically seek persecution of the designated enemies of the cause”. The party had lacked the explicit and practical goal, which had result in issues being treated in the most radical of ways. This had caused political improvisation to be a resort that was used constantly due to the “lack of policy rested upon the deployment of extreme violence”. In addition, the Nazi Party had found

    Read More

  • Who Should Be Blamed for the Holocaust?

    756 Words  | 2 Pages

    Hitler had a lot to do with Germany.’ Hitler started volunteering for the German army.’ This supports one way on how he rose up to power and did everything he did. In addition, “ As leader of the Nazi party he orchestrated the holocaust, which resulted in the death of four million Jews.’’ (BCC programmes) This shows Hitler was the one who was blamed and planned everything out.

    Read More

  • Essay On Nazi Germany A Totalitarian State

    2864 Words  | 6 Pages

    The extent to which Nazi Germany was a totalitarian state can be classed as to a substantial amount. With Hitler as Fuhrer and his ministers in control of most aspects of German social, political, legal, economical, and cultural life during the years 1934 to 1939, they mastered complete control and dictation upon Germany.

    Read More

  • The Holocaust and its Portrayal in The Book Thief by Markus Zusak

    1200 Words  | 3 Pages

    In WWII Germany was controlled as a fascist totalitarian state under the rule of Adolf Hitler. In 1933, the president of the Weimar Republic appointed Hitler as the chancellor of Germany. He continued gaining support from Germans by telling the Germans what they wanted to hear. He blamed problems on the Jews and promised to solve problems from the depression. Hitler gave the working class more jobs by destroying Jewish companies, the unemployed workers were given jobs of construction of building more works, and farmers were offered higher wages for crops. As chancellor, he controlled the media and censored comments against the war. As a fascist state, extreme nationalism was displayed and gained support through propaganda against Jews. Hitler wanted a larger military for territorial expansion. Eight countries were conquered by him: Poland, Norway, Belgium, Denmark, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, the ...

    Read More

  • Structuralist and Intentionalist approaches to Nazi Germany

    2268 Words  | 5 Pages

    Historians are often divided into categories in regard to dealing with Nazi Germany foreign policy and its relation to Hitler: 'intentionalist', and 'structuralist'. The intentionalist interpretation focuses on Hitler's own steerage of Nazi foreign policy in accordance with a clear, concise 'programme' planned long in advance. The 'structuralist' approach puts forth the idea that Hitler seized opportunities as they came, radicalizing the foreign policies of the Nazi regime in response. Structuralists reject the idea of a specific Hitlerian ideological 'programme', and instead argue for an emphasis on expansion no clear aims or objectives, and radicalized with the dynamism of the Nazi movement. With Nazi ideology and circumstances in Germany after World War I influencing Nazi foreign policy, the general goals this foreign policy prescribed to included revision of Versailles, the attainment of Lebensraum, or 'living space', and German racial domination. These foreign policy goals are seen through an examination of the actions the Nazi government took in response to events as they happened while in power, and also through Hitler's own ideology expressed in his writings such as Mein Kempf. This synthesis of ideology and social structure in Germany as the determinants of foreign policy therefore can be most appropriately approached by attributing Nazi foreign policy to a combination as both 'intentionalist' and 'structuralist' aims. Nazi foreign policy radicalized with their successes and was affected by Hitler pragmatically seizing opportunities to increase Nazi power, but also was based on early a consistent ideological programme espoused by Hitler from early on.

    Read More

More about Nazi Germany as a Totalitarian State

Open Document