Naylon And Rehak Case Study

693 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Police misconduct and its effects

“Project part 5”

Capstone

Juan Unda

Investigation Overview Naylon & Rehak
Tim Rehak and Mark Naylon are excused of corruption and violating the civil rights of drug dealer Vincent Pelligatti. In 2004 and 2005 they failed Integrity tests given by the FBI. Test 1 in November 2004, the location “Best Western” Hotel they were observed stealing evidence. The sum of $6,000 went missing; this was recorded. During Test 2 in July 2005 this also occurred. Mark Naylon also impersonated a peace officer; working with the Special Investigations Unit without the proper authorization
They are currently on Administrative leave. Their termination is pending the verdict of this legal matter. I feel they will not be able to work the streets after these videotaped violations of procedure. Based on those violations limited duty is off the table. …show more content…

I plan on interviewing the accused very soon. These interviews will be videotaped and I will suggested they each pass a polygraph. I’ll inquirer during the interview: Who did what, when they did or didn’t do these things and what they believe the FBI was looking for. I will dig very deep.
The law dictates they must be given a fair trial and an unbiased investigation must take place on my end. Their Union contract will allow them to continue receiving a salary until there is a legal verdict. Rehak and Naylon acquired attorneys claiming their innocents.
I believe this case goes way beyond minor employment violations and obviously due to FBI involvement it is criminal. Stolen funds and several Civil Rights violations dictate that my investigation must be very

Show More
Related

  • Exoneration of Ron Keine: A Death Row Narrative

    848 Words  | 2 Pages

    They had an alibi witness, a gas receipt, a ticket on the day of the murder. A police officer who would not come unless the judge subpoena him and the judge of course refused and would not pay the $650 to summon him. There were also two jailhouse snitches who lied about their testimony. The police misconduct was used in how they charged these individuals originally and how they have been accused initially with robbery, which later turned into murder. The police created the story and intimidated an eye witness who refused to testify and threatened to charge her with the murder if she refused. The attorneys told a moving tale and Ron Keine and company ended up being convicted. This case was before DNA testing but what exonerated these individuals was the actual murder confessing to the crimes. The entire case seemed like a fluke and malicious attack on these people. A guy in Carolina, confessed to all charges and had an epiphany and told the police where the weapon was located and how everything happened and how he dragged the body. He had to fight to get the police to accept his confession because the police were acting as if they already had their

    Read More

  • 1919 World Series

    1192 Words  | 3 Pages

    Rothstein) were indicted for conspiracy to defraud the public. All were acquitted for want of

    Read More

  • Antonino And Marcell's The Stopwatch Gang

    640 Words  | 2 Pages

    10.1 They did not dispose one bag full of evidence properly: the FBI got it before it went to the landfill and

    Read More

  • Cause Of Hysteria And Witch Trials In Salem 1692

    475 Words  | 1 Pages

    Based on document B, it has been proven that the main gender group of accusers were women. Also, these documents say the main age group was from 16-20 years of age. Most people in this town got very little attention. I am confident that these young women were

    Read More

  • The Rosenberg Trial

    2058 Words  | 5 Pages

    What they left out of Mr. Tartkow's testimony is that Julius said he was innocent of espionage. Most horrifying of the FBI's role is portrayed in the FBI's final questioning of Julius in Sing Sing right before his execution. The FBI asked him, "Was your wife cognizant of your activities?" Ethel was about to be executed as a full-fledged partner in Julius' crime. How can they doubt her participation now, only minutes before her execution? Many saw the trial as an attempt to scare all American members of the Communist Party.

    Read More

  • Questionable Interrogations

    1649 Words  | 4 Pages

    To show an unbiased and educated examination of the five cases involving questionable interrogations, I will give information on the crime that occurred, the problems with the interrogations and other evidence, who is at fault for problems within the case, how the defendant was cleared (if he was), and the compensation and future changes that were a direct response to these cases provided that they occurred or are in the process of occurring. The five cases that I will examine involve the accused: George Allen, Hunter Johnson, Peter Reilly, Michael Crowe, and Reggie Clemons. Each case is significantly different yet showcases many acts of injustice within the justice system.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of John Grisham's The Pelican Brief

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the year 2014, law enforcement in the United States estimated 1,165,383 violent crimes reported (“D2014VC”). Imagine the number of people needed get to the bottom of all of those cases! There are an abundant amount of Americans solving mysteries every day to keep others safe. Crimes are committed all around the United States at every second of the day! In John Grisham’s The Pelican Brief, he displays a firm relation between investigators and lawyers through the Criminal Justice System of acquiring suspects and evidence, indicated in the book with an exploration of the scandals of Supreme Court Justices Rosenberg and Jensen (Grisham).

    Read More

  • Argument Against Border Patrol

    1186 Words  | 3 Pages

    A writer for “The Daily Beast,” Andrew Becker reports that this additional step came “at the tail end of a massive hiring surge that began in 2006 and eventually added 17,000 employees, helping to make the agency the largest law enforcement operation in the country.” This arouses great unease and concern about “the thousands of employees Customs and Border Protection has hired over the past six years before it began mandatory polygraph tests for all applicants” (Becker). The records—official summaries of more than 200 polygraph admissions—contain many very disturbing testimonies of applicants admitting to drug smuggling and even murder (Becker). One confession, according to the Customs and Border Protection summary, consisted of an applicant admitting to having “‘no independent recollection of the events that resulted in a blood-doused kitchen and was uncertain if he committed any crime during his three-hour black out’”(Becker). The fact that thousands have been hired without the screening cannot be ignored. It is this negligence that is the cause of agents such as Justin Tackett—an officer who “had a dubious work history long before joining Border Patrol”—being able to find employment within the Border Patrol agency (Peter.) Tackett’s employment history is such as follows: “[he] joined

    Read More

  • Sacco And Vanzetti Analysis

    1640 Words  | 4 Pages

    The first evidence is the judge and jury ignored the physical evidence that both men weren’t in area when the crime happen, and their guns were not the same caliber there were a .38 while the gun reported was a .32. The police also had fingerprints from the buick the was used in the South Braintree crime. But the fingerprints didn’t match and the police instead questioned them on their religion, political beliefs and associates instead of the crime. The prosecutors used witness but the witness accounts made no sense. Meaning it didn’t match the descriptions of the men and the their stories weren’t the same and had loops hole. One witness said she saw the shooting from 60 feet away and said one of the men which she said was Sacco had big hands but he had small hands. Another said they saw Sacco kill Berardelli (one of the men who was killed in South Braintree), but the defense question and she said she hidden under workbench when the shots fired and didn’t see the men. The third witness said she talked to a man under a car fixing it as Sacco but her companion said she didn’t talk or saw him. Instead it was a pale sick young man. The day of the crime Sacco was getting a passport. A official confirmed Sacco was their getting a passport but the picture he had was too big. Other witnesses said they saw Vanzetti selling fish in Boston and some even bought some. The last piece of evidence is that the prosecutors tried to convicted them using consciousness of guilt. It is when you are guilty of a crime because you are lying about your actions because you are guilty. They lied and said they didn’t know Mike Boda. They did this because they wanted a car to transport their anarchist pamphlets to a safe place. They wanted to do this because the police could arrest anyone with these pamphlets and the people would be

    Read More

  • Cynthia Barbare: The Drug Scandal: Cynthia Tulia, Texas

    1130 Words  | 3 Pages

    Most of these defendants couldn’t afford private attorneys and depended upon public defenders. For instance, Joe Moore had two prior convictions and was facing a maximum of a 90 year sentence for selling three grams of cocaine. However, Moore begged his public defender to call Eliga Kelly to stand in his defense. Moore claimed that Kelly witnessed him shoe Coleman off of his property. For whatever reasons, his public defender never bothered to call Kelly to the stand or even question him privately. After all, Eliga Kelly was considered a star witness for the prosecution, but, as a result of that negligence, Moore was sentenced to 90 years. Unlike most criminal informants, Eliga Kelly refused to lie under oath and in a subsequent trial for a different defendant, the prosecutor called Kelly to the stand. Kelly contradicted Coleman’s testimony by naming several defendants, including Joe Moore, who refused to sell drugs to

    Read More

  • An Argument Against Racial Profiling by Police

    831 Words  | 2 Pages

    Walsh, James, and Dan Browning. "Presumed Guilty Until Proved Innocent." Star Tribune (Minneapolis, MN). 23 Jul 2000: A1+. SIRS Issues Researcher.

    Read More

  • Entrapment Case Study

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    This was the question asked in the case Mathews v. United States in 1988. The defendant, an employee of the Small Business Administration (SBA), was the contact for James DeShazer, the president of a company, which participated in the SBA (“Mathews v. United States”). DeShazer believed that he was not being provided with all of the benefits of the program, so he worked together with the FBI to request a loan from the defendant, attached to a bribe. The defendant agreed to these conditions and met up with DeShazer to exchange the money. The defendant was immediately arrested on a federal offense for accepting a bribe in exchange for an official act (“Mathews v. United States”). The defendant asked for an entrapment defense but the Court struck down his motion because the defendant would not agree to all the elements, and the Judged ruled that the jury would not hear an instruction of

    Read More

  • Crime Of Purchase Order Crime Case Study

    439 Words  | 1 Pages

    Based on my analysis of the case, I do not believe the investigation of this case has been performed effectively. The U.S. agencies have identified the victims, the crime, the methods used to carry out the crime, and the originating country where the criminals live. They have even worked with other agencies within the U.S. to get the word out to Americans about the crime and how to recognize the signs to avoid being a victim. However, a successful investigation should lead to an arrest. In this case, there have been no apprehensions or the identification of any suspects who committed the crime of purchase order fraud. Due to not making any arrests, there was no prosecution preformed in this case to evaluate.

    Read More

  • profile of a killer

    1545 Words  | 4 Pages

    During my interview with Dr. James R. Metts, Sheriff of Lexington County S.C., he informed me of the procedures involved in the Shari Faye Smith and Debra May Helmick case. He noted that "the Behavioral Unit in the FBI was extremely helpful in solving this case by giving us a psychological profile of the perpetrator and advising us on how to handle the media throughout the case" (Metts).

    Read More

  • Literature Review on Fraud/White Collar Crime, Organizations, and Individuals

    1800 Words  | 4 Pages

    Champion, D 2011, ‘White-collar crimes and organizational offending: An integral approach’, International Journal of Business, Humanities, and Technology, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 34-35.

    Read More

More about Naylon And Rehak Case Study

Open Document