Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of environment in childs development
Theories abou nature vs nurture
Role of environment in childs development
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Role of environment in childs development
“Nurture could have an even greater effect than originally thought, according to a University of Manchester study that is set to shake up the ‘nature versus nurture’ debate” (Phys.com). A long debated question between professions is weather nature or nurture has more effect on the development of a human being. Nature being the genetic one is given through their birth, while nurture is the experiences and environment one is surrounded by throughout life. Although nature does have an affect on a humans development, nurture has a much greater effect. It is no secret that a person's physical characteristics are affected by their genetic makeup, if not caused by one’s gene. However it is unknown if a person's genes have any effect in their development as a human. Nativists or believers in nature as the defining factor in human development state “we have an inner biological clock that switches characteristics on …show more content…
Nurture refers to anything that one experiences throughout life. This is important because humans learn through a “change in behavior based on experiences”(Reis). Because humans learn through experiences, this shows that people are not born with their abilities. As Reis stated a person grows through trial and error, for example a baby is not born knowing how to drive a car, or how to act around others, these things one learns by experiencing and changing their behavior based on the response. Another example is in the book The Absolutely True Diary of A Part Time Indian by Sherman Alexie Junior believes that he has to fight someone who insults him due to his past experiences on the rez, but that is not always the case in other places that junior has not visited. This process is constantly happening throughout one's life, therefor nurture has a greater effect on human development due to the fact that it constantly
One of the oldest controversy in psychology is nature vs. nurture. The whole debate boils down to genetic inheritance or environmental factors when it comes to human development. Philosopher Plato believed that certain behaviors are inborn or in others words occur naturally regardless of environmental factors. Then there are other philosopher such as John Locke who believe that the mind begins as a blank slate. So everything we come in contact with helps shape who we are. As for today, most expects now believe that behavior and personality are influenced by both nature and nurture. Some examples of gene inheritance are the color of your eyes, straight or curly hair, the pigment in your skin and certain inherited diseases. Not all people with blond hair are the same person and not all people in a family have the same color hair or eyes. An example of environmental factor that affects who you are is how you were brought up by your parents. Another example of environmental factor that helps influence behavior is the way you speak, you learn tone, speak, and sound from the people around you as a child. (Knowlton, 2005)
Nature, the more scientific theory of the two, is the belief that hereditary traits found in our genes make us who we are, believable but not very convincing when we consider the theory of nurture. Human beings learn new things everyday, as soon as we come in to the world, our learning process begins. As a newborn baby, we slowly learn and adapt in order to survi...
A great example of nature vs nurture would be to take someone like Obama for instance and ask the following questions. What do you think shaped Obama to becoming the president? Was it in his genes? So no matter what his parents did to raise him, he would have been the president anyway. Or was it the environment he grew up in that made him want to lead and become the president?
My argument is regarding the Nature Versus Nurture Debate. This controversial debate has existed since 1869, when the phrase “Nature Versus Nurture” was coined by the English polymath, Francis Galton. The emphasis on nurture
nurture has been a highly discussed topic for many years, and specifically a hot topic for philosophers. The focus, how far are human behaviors, ideas, and feelings, innate and how far are they all learned? As far back as the 17th century, the French philosopher Renè Descartes set out views which held that we all, as individual human beings, possess certain in-born ideas that influence our approach to the world. On the other hand, the British philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, emphasized the role of experience as fully contributing to behavioral development. Locke set out the case that the human mind at birth is a complete, but receptive, blank slate. He believed that experience was what imprints knowledge. Other philosophers, such as Plato and Aristotle were two people that had different views on the issue. Plato believed that knowledge and behavior were due to innate factors, but environmental factors still played a role in the equation. Whereas, Aristotle believed in the thought of, “tabula rasa,” which means blank slate. This thought can conclude that everyone is born mindless and you gain your own unique knowledge and behavior from your experiences. For example, things such as, personality, intelligence, sexuality, attitude and habits are all created new. Many philosophers have looked at this debate and voiced their opinions, some raising more questions about the
Researchers have been in dispute for many centuries about whether nature or nurture has a stronger influence on early human development. Nature is inherent traits from birth and Nurture is one's environment (physical, cultural, social, and familial) plays in one's physical and psychological identity. This essay will examine the degree to which nurture or nature influence early human development.
One of the oldest debates in the history of psychology is The Nature VS. Nurture debate. This argument consists of two sides. One side believes that a person’s development is composed from DNA while the other side believes that development is influenced by experience and environment. Studies have shown that both the nature and nurture side, being DNA and environment, contribute to a person’s overall character and being.
The nature verses nurture debate analyzes genetics and environmental components that contribute to the evolution of one’s self. Both environmental surroundings and inherited genes contribute to the development of individuals. This debate exist due to inexplicit scientific findings and societies urge to uncover why people are the way they are. Scientific research indicates that an individual’s genetic makeup or physical properties are determined by a combination ratio of recessive and dominant geneo and phenotypes. This process of DNA coding plays a key role in an individual’s physical appearance, medical conditions, and addictions. Sarah Mae Sincero, author of Nature and Nurture Debate, further speculates if genetics are a factor in determining
The nature versus nurture is a debate that is common around the elements of bringing up and the capabilities passed to the children and what they end up becoming in the future. Talents and precepts that people may have growing up are largely attributed to either nature or having come from the way the children were brought up. For some, nature which largely the genetic makeup of a person is the sole reason they are the way they are at an older age. For the other faction of the debate, it is the way that one brings up their children that determines the success they have in their adulthood. It is important to note the impact environments have on the growth of a child. Much like a seed, a child is open to the platform they are introduced to. As
Nature and Nurture are both things that work together they aren’t just separate jobs. They each may do a bit of different things but all in all they both work together and they do things with each other and may also do some things alone.
Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.
Don’t you wish you could go shopping for your child’s genes as easily as you go shopping for your child’s jeans? You want them to be the star of the football team, or first chair in orchestra, maybe you want her to be the most popular girl in school. Don’t you wish you had the power to make the “perfect” child? You do have the power. It’s called nurture. The way someone grows up, the way someone is nurtured is what affects their lives in the future. Nature vs. Nurture is an argument that often comes up between people. Was that person born with it, or raised to be that way? Nature gives you the child; it is up to you to nurture it. How much of whom we are is shaped by genes and how much by our environment? Nurture is what shapes who we are because our peers influence our decisions, our parents raise us how they believe we should be raised, and we are not born with experience.
The Nature versus Nurture debate has been argued in psychology for a long time. As of today, we know that nature and nurture both portray important roles in the human development. The controversy comes into play when deciding whether a person’s development or behavior is due to a persons inherited genes or is influenced by their environment and life experiences. The natural side of the discussion asserts that the facial features and the way of their developed is strictly through DNA/genetics that are transmitted by ancestors. The nurture side of the debate argues that we are born with a clean slate and that all facial features are developed through experience and one’s
For many year’s people have been trying to determine if nurture has a bigger impact on individuals or if nature does. Many people cannot decide because both aspects play a role in making us the person we are today. Nurture is the ability for us to be loved and given the opportunity to grow and develop. If we did not have nurture in our lives we would not be able to grow, and we would not be able to understand the concept of caring or loving someone. This is a key part of child development.
The debate between nature and nurture seems like an ongoing process. The term nature in this case refers to the biological and family factors whereas nurture refers to the social and environmental factors. I think that our personality and development are influenced by both sides. It is almost impossible to differentiate between these two influences, there isn’t really a good way of telling how much we are influence genetically and how much we are influence environmentally. Certain physical characteristics, such as eye color, hair type, and diseases are biologically determined by genetic inheritance. On the other side, certain habits, and characteristics are completely influenced by the environment. Let’s take intelligence for an example, one