Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Benefits and limitations of different methods of presentation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
“Nancy Duarte” explains in her presentation “The secret structure of great talks” the common structure of great talks that makes their message resonate with listeners. She starts her presentation by saying that everyone has the power to change the world with an idea. She says that an idea can be powerful and change anything through the way it is communicated and shared with others. It can be adopted or rejected by others. But if it is not shared it will become powerless and die. She talks about her experience with vintage European posters that she loves, and she compares herself to a woman shown in a poster who is all fired up risking her life to promote suavitos baking spices. Nancy says that she loves presentations which she thinks are an …show more content…
She started with Aristotle who had a three-act structure, a beginning, a middle, and an end. Then she studied hero archetypes and she found the flaw in presentations that is the presenter is the star of the show while, in fact, the audience is the hero of the idea. Also, she studied Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey, she found that the role of a presenter is to be a mentor who helps the audience move from their old beliefs to his/her new idea. And by studying Gustav Freytag’s pyramid who had a five-act structure, which has an exposition, a rising action, a climax, a falling action, and a denouement. After doing her study she drew a shape, the shape of a great presentation. Nancy Duarte examined this shape by overlaying it over two great communicator’s talks: Martin Luther King’s “I Have a Dream” speech and Steve Jobs’ 2007 iPhone launch speech, and it worked. So, she uses this shape as an analysis tool to transcribe speeches. And according to this shape, any presentation begins with real situation “what is” and it is compared with the presenter’s idea “what could be” and the middle goes back and forth to draw the audience towards the idea especially who are resisting …show more content…
First, she introduced herself as an excited person who is eager to succeed. This makes the impression that she is a hardworking, knowledgeable woman and gains her audience’s trust. She also explained the stages of a powerful talk thoroughly from beginning to end in an interesting way which stimulates the audience to express their ideas and present themselves correctly. She started her presentation by addressing her audience with a motivating sentence: “You have the power to change the world,” So they can anticipate a great presentation that can change their lives. She showed them how an idea can be powerful if it is communicated well or powerless if it is not. She figured out the importance of incorporating story into presentations. And she supported her discovery with a study she did in philosophy, cinema, and literature fields. She drew a shape that shows the structure of a powerful presentation, and she proved its validity by overlying this shape over two speeches of two great communicators, and it worked. At last, she shared her terrible experience during her childhood, and how she managed to move on and choose the right path for her life and change the world around her. She finished her presentation with an inspirational call to action with hope: “I want to encourage you to do that.” In general, she excelled in presentation and she was
Even the best arguments have no effect on an audience that does not trust the speaker. Many speakers attempt to establish their ethos through mentioning accolades that establish them as experts. While this can build credibility, this type of communication is weaker than one that emphasizes a mutual understanding to create a personal connection. In her opening statement, Quindlen claims that she sees herself as part of the audience (294). She uses
This helps her deliver the message because her tone is very confident and it makes her presentation really effective because she sounds like someone who really wants something to be done with the gender inequality in Africa. She is really passionate and the audience is able to feel it when they hear how confident she is. Another code and convention that she uses is when she pauses. This helps her deliver her message when ever she pauses, it lets audience take in what she is saying. There are many parts before she pauses where she says something funny, and it helps her because it keeps the audience engaged in what is to come.
She used humor occasionally but it wasn't usually relevant to the actual speech. There was no use of visual aids which was fine because it did not really require any. Moving on, she discussed the things that have worked for her like making schedules and being persistent. In doing so, she related it back on how one could use her examples in order to become more efficient. She used many hand gestures which helped us concentrate on her message more effectively.
She gives the listeners personal advice she has learned and uses pathos in a more emotional way. Her allusion to the world trade center is a perfect example of this. She reminds us how we can easily overcome obstacles when we work together with other people. Later in the address Amy Poehler shares a few things she learned from when she studied improvisation in Chicago. She says, “Say ‘yes.’ Live in the moment. Make sure you play with people who have your back. Make big choices early and often. Don’t start a scene where two people are talking and jumping out of a plane. Start the scene having already jumped. If you are scared, look into your partner’s eyes. You’ll feel better”,. The way she relates the strategies she learned there back to life touches your heart. She closes her speech with a heartfelt message, “When you feel scared, hold someone’s hand and look into their eyes. And when you feel brave, do the same thing. You are all here because you are smart. And you are brave....As you head out into the world, I wish you love and light, joy, and much
The TED Talk “Why 30 is not the new 20” by Meg Jay, was a powerful and successful speech. Jay delivers an inspirational message to twenty-year-olds to not waste away important years of their life in an unmeaningful relationship or career. Instead she stresses the importance of searching for a life-long partner sooner rather than later in life. She also talked about taking career risks while still young, because these opportunities will likely be indefeasible later in life. Jay 's main points were very effective in persuading one to consider living by this set of social standards. It is clear that Meg Jay is an experienced public speaker, because of how well the overall presentation was. She does all of the basics perfectly, such as standing
Hillary Clinton speech “Women Rights” transmitted a crucial message to the world and that was to do something about gender inequality. Pathos helped transmit an emotional appeal to the audience and make them see the soft side of Clinton. Pathos and Logos supported the facts stated to the public with evidence and compassionate words. The rhetorical device of repetition made it possible for the audience to realize the level of importance the topic had. Altogether made the speech have the great impact on people’s perspectives about women
Because of Keller’s use of pathos to grab attention, using a strong, independent ethos and then backing it up using logos, it was easy to get wrapped up in her cause. Keller’s style was effective and left the audience with the desire to take action.
With parts of the context missing the way in which the speaker delivered the speech could have helped distract from those flaws. For instance within her attention getter she jumped for one of the slogans, which gave the appearance that she was really into the speech, but then giggled about it for a few seconds. This made the audience wonder about the seriousness to come. Throughout the entire speech hand gestures were nonexistent. The speaker did however change the pitch of her voice frequently. The first time was when the speaker asked the audience what the car keys meant, and then again when the slogans were restated. Another flaw in the delivery was the amount of time she spent looking at the notecard. The speaker had two green notecards, which both were covered completely. She was constantly looking down reading the notecards. In turn there were many unneeded pauses. Those pauses were not impactful ones either, but just a quiet whole while the speaker was reading. Following most of the pauses was um, ah, so, but,or you know. The filler words took away from the message the speaker was trying to get across. Overall the words used throughout were easy to understand, but sometimes a little bit repetitive. For instance she used plethora twice about 10 seconds apart. The speaker did however look the part. She had on a pair of slacks with a sweater. By looking professional it gave some automatic respect. Overall the
Fiskio herself was a good speaker -- she had a strong, conversational tone and used very intelligent language. She also had great articulation, pronunciation, pitch, volume, fluency, and projection. Although she paced slightly and used some hand gestures, they added to the presentation instead of detracting from it, and she kept good eye contact the entire time. Additionally, she was very confident, and she seemed poised and knowledgeable. She also used a lot of quotes and outside support, which gave her credibility and validity. Nonetheless, the presentation itself was lacking. The ideas seemed unorganized, and there was little to no explanation of their connections and relative importance to the average person. Despite its interesting beginning and ending, the body of the speech was confusing and not extremely engrossing. Even further, Fiskio’s PowerPoint was not very well done. The layout was passable, but it really only consisted of pictures slapped haphazardly on. The PowerPoint was not visually appealing and, though the pictures were good, it just seemed like it was lazily
Renowned and engaging speakers have the ability to connect their values and ideas to greater causes and principles, leaving an enduring impact on the audience. You may be questioning what makes a great speaker? And what qualities and features contribute to the formation of a powerful speech? It is understood that a great speaker has the ability to communicate to larger truths and carve those truths on the audience’s hearts and minds as they surpass the context, place and time of the deliverance of the speech, and focus on conveying their ideas and values.
Speeches functioned as great tools for inspiring and motivating people. A passionate and charismatic speaker could often change a group of people’s view of the world with just a short speech. A perfect example of this phenomenon can be seen in the leaders of religious groups such as Matthias and Joseph Smith. These two men both possessed the ability to make people pi...
Over the recent four months in Communication 1402 class, I have addressed three formal speechs and completed a number of chapters in the corresponding textbook “Communication Works”. This course of Communication aims to provide general information what public speaking is and how to address a public speaking. Recalling back the experience during the processes of completing the Speech to Imform, Speech to Persuade, and Group Presentation, I will draw a conclusion about this course and these three presentations in five aspects, comprising my previous perception of public speaking before this course; learning from the Speech to Inform; the goal and evaluation of Speech to Persuade; learning from the Group Presentation; the most important thing learned from this course.
I have also learned about different types of audiences and speeches including persuasive, informative, entertaining and delivering special occasion speeches. It came to my attention that whenever I was making these presentations or speeches, I needed to do so with confidence, consistence and practice before the actual presentation and completely eliminate the element of panic. It was also clear that capturing the attention of the audience and engaging them in the whole process, it was necessary to have a very strong introduction and also try and use visuals to deliver the message. It was therefore vital to respect each person’s diversity and cultural values (Lucas, 2011).
In public speaking I learned many types of concepts, theories and terms of communication. In concepts of publicly speaking there’s, relaxation, practice, credibility, attention getters, attire, organization, volume, emotion, audience relation, and movement. In my first speech, “The any old bag speech” I quickly learned the do’s, don’ts and concepts of my speech performance.
This brings us to the two factors that influence an audience when presenting information through a media: the vividness of presentation and the position of a story (Baran 302). These factors, along with others, induce the audience to feel as if a particul...