When department store manager Jean Fanuchi noticed a decline in net profit sales three consecutive months in a row, she turned to hidden cameras and microphones. When all possibilities narrowed down to employee theft and a series of procedures failed to turn up any clues, desperation led Jean to resort to these measures. How might have Jean’s actions been influenced by morality or the law? Although morality and the law may seem inseparable at first, they can be distinguished from one another. Even then, there seems to be a connection bridging the two. What is their relationship and can one alter the other? Can one be attributed to another or take precedence over the other? In moral philosophy (ethics) this matter is open for much debate, especially when other viable and less invasive solutions exist.
Morality is the distinction between behaviors of right and wrong. It pertains to conduct that can be of serious consequence to human well-being. Although morality takes priority over other competing standards, its soundness is contingent on the adequacy of supporting reasons. On the contrary, the law is a legislative system that underlies a body of rules and rights. While morality allows for personal choice, the law does not. Through fear of punishment, the law governs behavior; it has enforcing authority and can subject society to obedience.
Often, we fail to see the distinction between morality and law. Many times, we indecorously allow one to guide the other. What society morally deems right, or wrong, can simply be a reflection of the law. At times, they serve to channel our conducts. But unfortunately, the law does not always serve morality justice, and moral principles are not always consistent across society. Hence, we must not...
... middle of paper ...
...ve alone, with proper regulations, they could be very successful. Such regulations include limiting privileged employees who can remove the security tags, and permitting only select employees the authority to open security cases. These approaches accomplish similar results—they stop employee theft—and at the same time, mitigate the violation of privacy rights and legal proceedings.
In summary, the law has enforcing authority that governs behavior while morality is the distinction between right and wrong behavior. We should not confuse, nor inadequately allow the law to guide our morality principles or vice versa. Jean disregarded her moral principles to put a stop to theft in a fashion that may have been lawful, but immoral. Although she was able to trace down to a culprit, her employees may be dismayed to continue working for her, and society may be quite disturbed.
Morality derives from the Latin moralitas meaning, “manner, character, or proper behavior.” In light of this translation, the definition invites the question of what composes “proper behavior” and who defines morality through these behaviors, whether that be God, humanity, or an amalgamation of both. Socrates confronted the moral dilemma in his discourses millennia ago, Plato refined his concepts in his Republic, and leaders such as Mahatma Gandhi would commit their life work to defining and applying the term to political reform. Finally, after so many years, Martin Luther King’s “A Letter from Birmingham Jail” reaches a consensus on the definition of morality, one that weighs the concepts of justice and injustice to describe morality as the
Then, in Jeffrey L. Seglin’s essay, “Just Because It’s Legal, Is It Right?” he reveals his perspective on corporate America. Seglin argues that different sides give way to different views of the law. Then, he goes on to emphasize that laws are just pardon from having to think and do your job right. Seglin then brings up the idea of situational ethics and how it is just used to cover up for people and bl...
It can be argued that ‘crimes of indifference are more immoral because it can be said that when they are committing these crimes they are not concerned with whom they are harming, but when someone commits an intentional act they want to harm who they want to harm and they know why they are committing the act’. These Acts of indifference can be seen in the example of corporate crimes.
In 1943, with World War 2 in full throttle, Ayn Rand’s novel “The Fountainhead” was published. Written during a chaotic period in history, this book appeals to the reader's emotions by promoting individual rights, capitalism, and romantic realism. Rand advocated reason along with ethical and rational egoism and opposed collectivism. The main protagonist in the book is named “Howard Roark”. Howard Roark has a love interest named “Dominique Francon”. Dominique is in love with Roark yet she still wants to destroy him because Dominique thinks that Roark’s greatness is going to go unappreciated.
The main argument that circles natural law and positive law is whether or not morality can be distinguished from law, and if it can is it then justifiable to criminalize those who are...
Law is drawn from tradition and cultural attribute of community based on non-secular values or social cultural traditions. However, law changes with ever-changing social and economic circumstances and scientific advancement. Therefore law cannot be divorced from morality. However, it's meant for a bigger community. Persons having abnormal behaviour or instinct, a miniscule minority cannot challenge a law meant for the right-minded majority. However, now days to imitate a unique culture even in South Africa laws can be changed to accommodate a miniscule minority.
In this essay I will compare person-Centred counselling with cognitive-Behavioural counselling and their different approaches and why the counselling relationship is so important. There will be a brief outline of what Person Centred and Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy.
Behavioral conduct is regulated through two different avenues: law and morality. Morality is defined as the “rules of behavior an individual or a group may follow out of personal conscience and that are not necessarily part of legislated law” (Encyclopedia of American Law). Morality channels our behavior through a system of incentives; bad acts produce “… guilt and disapprobation, and good acts result in virtuous feelings and praise” (Shavell 228). Law, on the other hand, is concerned with justice and is upheld through “… the threat of sanctions if we disobey legal rules” (Shavell 227). The point of contention occurs when individuals incorrectly assume that a just decision necessitates morality. These individuals dispute the scope of authority that either morality or law should encompass. Morality and law do not operate in different spheres; instead, the laws are created with a primary focus towards persuading individuals to make moral decisions. In both A Man for All Seasons by Robert Bolt and the Greek play Antigone by Sophocles, difficulty ensues not because law and morality are actually conflicting, but because the individuals interpreting law and morality have varying interpretations.
Morality is normatively defined as “a code of conduct that, given specified conditions, would be put forward by all rational persons” (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy). Throughout history, morality or rather the idea of the ‘correct’ morality has been an important topic of discussion. How do humans acquire morality? What makes humans moral? Who in a society defines morality? In every workplace, ethical and moral behavior is expected and is the norm. Both 17th century philosopher Blaise Pascal and public relations professional Patricia Parsons believe morality should be in the workplace. Pascal crafted his life’s work, Pensées, in the 17th century. The collection was written to help remove any misunderstandings or stigma of the Christian religion. Patricia Parsons wrote Ethics in Public Relations: A Guide to Best Practice in 2008. The book explores the idea of what the ethical practices in public relations are, and provides examples and trials to prove the thesis. Therefore when looking at how morality appears in society, Pascal’s workplace will be the church, and Parsons’ will be a public relations firm. Both of these places serve the public abate in different ways. This paper will explore the guiding system for moral development and how humans gain morality as they live and experience life. These two individuals could not be more different, yet both share similar views on morality. Morality is essential for a successful professional life.
It is important to first understand the difference between law and ethics. Ethics examines the values and actions of people. Often times there is no one right course of action when one is faced with an ethical dilemma. On the other hand, laws
And also ethical and moral influence each other, then both were to have a close relationship with the norms and laws in society. Law can not be separated from public life in order to create a supportive atmosphere of a society that has a moral code of conduct therein. In case of violation of the moral code of conduct, then the law will take the role of sanctions. The sanctions may be social sanctions at national and international result of a breach in accordance with applicable international law and in accordance with agreements between
William O. Douglas said, "Common sense often makes good law." Well that is what laws essentially are, rules and regulations that make sure common sense is followed. One could even say that laws are enforced ethics. Laws serve several roles and functions in business and society, and this paper will discuss those roles and functions.
Both law and morality serve to regulate behaviour in society. Morality is defined as a set of key values, attitudes and beliefs giving a standard in which we ‘should’ behave. Law, however, is defined as regulating behaviour which is enforced among society for everyone to abide by. It is said that both, however, are normative which means they both indicate how we should behave and therefore can both be classed as a guideline in which society acts, meaning neither is more effective or important than the other. Law and morals have clear differences in how and why they are made. Law, for example, comes from Parliament and Judges and will be made in a formal, legal institution which result in formal consequences when broken. Whereas morals are formed under the influence of family, friends, media or religion and they become personal matters of individual consciences. They result in no formal consequence but may result in a social disapproval which is shown also to occur when breaking the law.
Law is rationalized with evidence, cannot be used to manipulate a nation, protects and ensures the safety of the people, and is parallel with universal human morals. Although religion serves many purposes, it can neither serve nor be the things law encompasses; religious beliefs cannot come above the laws of a country because of their ambiguity and tendency to be manipulated.
The law is the highest degree of rules and anybody who follows it could be said as a good person. But still however, a person that follows the law cannot be said entirely that he/she have good ethics and mannerism. For example, smoking in public near non-smokers and children is not against the law but it is not ethical to do that. A person that really follows the law that has written by the country certainly sometimes doesn’t show good ethics in character.