Mutuality and Patriarchy in Shakespeare's Macbeth

2120 Words5 Pages

Mutuality and Patriarchy in Macbeth

Since the beginning of recorded time, the basic human distinction in human social order has revolved around gender; our sex at birth determines the role we will play in our society, the status we will hold in our culture, and even the structure of our daily lives. The biological reality that women can give birth and men cannot has led to a habitual consciousness of two sex classes, and, in the past, these two classes coexisted with equality in co-operative communities; however, Marilyn French contends in The War on Women that as men began to build what would become patriarchy, or "male supremacy built by force," the female class became disempowered, marginalised, and subjugated to the will of the male class (9). Further, our Western creation myth not only celebrates male dominance over the natural world and those associated with nature, namely women, but also justifies "a male assault" against women by declaring that God *made* women subordinate to men by endowing men with reason, logic, and intellect while giving women traits that subvert proper order and rationality: chaotic emotionality, passion, and weakness (17). These arbitrary "gender principles," as French labels them, backed by religion and the state, have turned the dichotomy of the sexes into a battle between the two opposing spheres rather than a harmonisation of the masculine and feminine into an organic whole.

Though the male/female dichotomy is evident in every category of social existence, there is an exceptional awareness of the split and its implications expressed in the Shakespearean canon. For many feminist critics, including Juliet Dusinberre, Shakespeare's works are particularly compelling in that he "saw t...

... middle of paper ...

...h, Marilyn. Shakespeare's Division of Experience. New York: Summit Books, 1981. ------. The War on Women. New York: Summit Books, 1992. Gohlke, Madelon. "'I wooed thee with my sword': Shakespeare's Tragic Paradigms." The Woman's Part: Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare. Eds. Carolyn Ruth Swift Lenz, et al. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1980. 154-167. Novy, Marianne L. Love's Argument: Gender Relations in Shakespeare. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1984. Perkins, William. "Christian Economy." Daughters, Wives, and Widows. Ed. Joan Larsen Klein. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1992. 151-173. Shakespeare, William. King Lear. Ed. Russell Fraser. New York: Signet, 1987. -----. Macbeth. Ed. Sylvan Barnet. New York: Signet, 1963. Stone, Lawrence. The Family, Sex and Marriage in England, 1500-1800. New York: Harper and Row, 1977.

Open Document