Ms. Tillery's Resistance In The Workplace

771 Words2 Pages

clearly explains Ms. Tillery’s resistance, when it states that in therapy resistance reflects a fear of re-traumatization and disappointment. Perhaps, Ms. Tillery in the past encounter a worker, who liked me reassured her that she could trust her and would help her through the process. However, later on, broke her trust and disregarded everything she had disclosed in the comfort of their relationship. Furthermore, understanding resistance helps us to remain available to help a family despite any reactions that they may exhibit. Effective social work practice requires that we remain empathetic, genuine and respectful at all times. (Teitelbaum, 1991). Teitelbaum (1991) also emphasizes that once the worker starts building a relationship with the client through engagement skills, he or she will start to understand that resistance reflects need. By understanding resistance, the worker becomes less reactive to the client's behavior and is able to meet the client where they are at. As I managed to communicate and interact with Ms. Tillery, I realized that she was constantly told by her family, how she supposed to act and what she should do. I also observed that even though Ms. Tillery did not like to be told what to do, she did not know how to say no or stand up to her family, …show more content…

According to Goldstein defenses can be both adaptive and maladaptive. Adaptive defenses are positive and functional to the individual, it allows the individual to release anxiety. However, maladaptive defenses are negative behaviors that protect the individual from anxiety, but in a dysfunctional way. Maladaptive defenses, often lead to more stress in the individual and do not teach the individual to how to handle daily life challenges. (Goldstein,

Open Document