Mrs. Lappe Argumentative Analysis

1222 Words3 Pages

Sustainability requires a 360-degree transformation of mankind's lifestyle and thought process. The previous weeks during course Sociology, 301 Global Environment Sustainability educated me about multiple inventions and gadgets to end global warming. However, week three of Sociology 301 Global Environment Sustainability broaden my understanding and most defiantly, transformed and enhanced my understanding of how to achieve sustainability. For example, week’s three information help me understand sustainability does not mainly develop through manmade technology. Therefore, what supports sustainability on planet earth? Sustainability depends on mankind’s attitude toward nature. Week three’s writers and speakers informed me of the common attitude …show more content…

Lappe argument is clearly understandable; for example, Mark Tran noted the feelings of Vandana Shiva facts against GMO. Tran wrote Shiva views of GMO as human means of an easy way out (2013), but in reality GMO production only aids in environmental disadvantages. For example, Tran stated GMO have transformed pests into super insects, therefore requiring more and different types of chemicals to kill new types of super insects from crops (2013). Henceforth, today’s agriculture continues to be saturated with chemicals and thus furthering mankind from sustainability. Additionally, the nutrition contributes to an unhealthy human being. Also food industries are focused at developing more processed junk foods in today’s world. Therefore, both Tran and Lappe expresses Food Corporation miss the mark of ecofriendly. Therefore, Tran’s and Lappe’s ideas points to fact many industries are not thinking like an eco-system. By inculcating a lifestyle as an eco-system corporation will understand the earth. Accordingly, Thich Nhat Hanh stated “When we garden, we can learn how to grow certain plants next to oar vegetables and flowers that will ward off harmful insects, deer and rabbits without hurting them” (2008). Therefore, Hanh supports that humans need to understand the earth in order to support sustainability. Henceforth, learning to understand the earth requires effort, but doing so will remind humans of the importance of earth. Applying these ideas in communities throughout the world will promote sustainability. For example, if community members continue to learn about the earth, this will promote efforts to protect it.
Thich Nhat Hanh stated the importance of nature for the human health. Hanh explained humans in the city are away from nature (2008). Therefore, humans become less aware of the endangerment of nature. By constant involvement of nature in human life is beneficial for sustainability. Promoting Hanh beliefs will transform community members’ involvement to care

Open Document