Sudarshan Srirangapatanam Mr. Nobody vs. SHARDS Films are one of the most important medium in information transfer since it helps the audience easily visualize the information being presented. In addition to visual representation, films allow us to easily empathize with characters since they are trained in the field of acting. Mr. Nobody is a film that provides you with experience similar to that of Shards, similar story presented in the book form. In this movie we see Nemo (Jared Leto) as our protagonist who has problems with his memory and is trying to access it but is having problems in doing so. Furthermore this movie revolves around a plot in which Nemo is seen in distinct timelines and different characters which are really hard to keep track. However it is very important to consider the claims made in this movie. It is claimed that Nemo as a child is capable of predicting the future and thinks that as long as he doesn’t make a choice everything seems to be possible. And the whole movie is based on this principle and …show more content…
Nobody has many similarities between the book Shards. Both mediums present us with a reverse screenplay experience where the final outcome is reveals at the very beginning in an attempt to make the complicated plot or story a little more comprehensible to average audience. In Shards we see that Ismet ultimately ends up in U.S.A despite the obstacles that he faces in the path, and similarly we see Nemo as a 118 year old mortal in a futuristic world. Many other generalized parallels such as, use of 3 female mates, travel to U.S.A, can be drawn between the two mediums. It is also important to consider strange parallels that can be drawn between the two mediums; in Shards we see dreams and involvement of brain in creating the story and in Mr. Nobody we see that dreams are the driving force in Nemo being able to recall his memory. And both specifically focus on shards of memory which leads to fragmentation of the whole plot or
The movie On Golden Pond, is a representation of the different psychosocial stages society goes through as people age. In the movie, various characters face distinctive crises as they reach a psychosocial stage, which bring tension in the movie. During the movie each character goes through different life challenges such as cognitive and psychosocial developments, which will lead to more appreciation each character’s lives.
The similarities are prolific in their presence in certain parts of the novel, the very context of both stories shows similarities, both are dealing with an oppressed factor that is set free by an outsider who teaches and challenges the system in which the oppressed are caught.
The underlying themes of the stories are l valid contrasts between the works. In some portions the themes are of the same facets, such as how in both books two men have a direct conflict between
related to the movie. I will also proposing a research study of how the characters from this movie
The basic ideas of the two novels are also similar. They have to do with rebellion against the so-called perfect new world and the sanctuary
Things that are similar about the two novels and how both of their dreams were crushed are both are groups of people who have these dreams and each finds or meets something that can help their dreams come true, the pearl and Candy. Furthermore, the realization of their dreams coming to an end is, in both books, caused by the death of someone who is a part of the dream, Coyotito and Lennie.
those parts unable to work at a normal function are what creates the flashbacks that the
In both books they share some traits, even though they may not look anything alike they are. both of these novels are dystopian novels and many characters share similarity’s.
... almost nothing alike from a superficial aspect. The stories have different historical contexts and they simply don’t have much in common to the average audience. It is easy to contrast the stories, but deep within certain elements, the stories can be linked in several ways.
“I hunt more dangerous game….” Similarities and differences can appear anywhere, especially in the short story and the movie called The Most Dangerous Game. They have similar, yet different expositions, characters, and plots with conflicts. Many people say that books or short stories are better than movies because of the similarities and differences that are found. Books or short stories are usually more descriptive, informative, and do not stray too far from the central idea or main theme, while movies only fall into one or two of these categories. Movies hardly ever fall into all three categories, however if they do the movies become better. This is not the case with The Most Dangerous Game. One place where movies and short stories have major similarities and differences is at the beginning of the story or the exposition.
... each other and ultimately determine the fate of the characters in the story, especially the fate of the Heroine.
Aside from the conditions, which lead to the creation of these works, they share a number of other common threads. Symbolism aside these works are very similar on the surface. Both are a collection of seemingly disjointed images, which when put together by the reader or observer serve up a strong social message. That messages being that the wars and conflicts of the times have twisted the world. This is reinforced by the contorted and misshapen images in both works.
First of all, I was touched by the following statement “ You can be mad as a mad dog at the way things went. You can swear, curse the fates, regret everything you ever did but when it comes to the end. You have to let it go”. Actually, I was in a gloomy mood before I watched this film, something really grieved happened and I was lost and confused. I cursed the fate and blame everyone and everything include myself. Nevertheless, the word “let it go” helped me lay my burdens down and I understood that something I had to accept truth which had happened and let it
...n (Director) mistakenly seems to believe can carry the whole film. On the strength "based on a true story", he has rejected attention-grabbing characters, an imaginative plot, and unforgettable villains.
The biggest similarity between the two stories is the notion of moral decline; the beings start off as peaceful things that don’t need homes, food or anything. As time goes on they need those things and more. After a while they start stealing from each other and eventually hurt each other.