Mr. Hale's Trifles

995 Words2 Pages

Trifle’s was a play about a murder case that brings attention to how a woman’s role is often seen as a trifle. The play begins with Mr. Hale giving his account to the Sherriff about what happened when he went to visit John Wright. Mr. Hale attempted to provide a very detailed account of all the events that took place from the time he arrived at the Wrights home. The biggest thing the reader got from his description was that Ms. Wright had no alibi making her a very likely suspect but the one thing missing was the motive. While Mr. Hale was explaining this story, the Sherriff was looking around the kitchen stating how it was dirty and she must not have been a very good housewife. Mrs. Hale chimed in and said “There is a great deal of work …show more content…

Hale finished giving his testimony all the men decided to go upstairs and try to find a motive leaving the two ladies downstairs in the kitchen. Up until this point the two ladies really appeared to be in the background with little purpose. The two ladies began talking to each other and its evident Mrs. Hale will be defending Mrs. Wright. We see this when Ms. Hale ask Mrs. Peters whether or not she thinks Mrs. Wright committed the murder and when Mrs. Peters seems on the fence about it Mrs. Hale says “Well I don’t think she did” (Glaspell, 749). Mrs. Peters even says “But Mrs. Hale, the law is the law” these interactions are showing to the reader how Mrs. Hale doesn’t want Mrs. Wright to be guilty when Mrs. Peters is on the side of the law and feels it needs to be …show more content…

We see them both begin to justify themselves with Mrs. Peters discussing a story on page 753 saying “When I was a girl-my kitten-there was a boy took a hatchet…if they hadn’t held me back I would have-hurt him.” This is showing how Mrs. Peters is beginning to understand how someone could feel angry enough to murder someone. We also see Mrs. Peters say on page 754 “Wouldn’t they just laugh!” She is talking about how the men would just laugh at them like they had done all day therefor the evidence is probably insignificance. Mrs. Hale justifies protecting Mrs. Wright through feeling guilty that she was not a better friend to her. We see her thought page 754 say things such as “I might have known she needed help” and “I wish I had come over here once in a while!” She even stated to Ms. Peters that her husband sucked the life out of her. The last justification we see is when Mrs. Peters says on page 754 “Wouldn’t they just laugh!” She is referring to how the men would just laugh at them like they had done all day therefor the evidence is probably insignificance. This shows the audience how she now felt she had to protect this other woman from the injustices of being married to an abuser. She took the bird out of the red tin can and then placed it in Mrs. Hales apron. The actions that these women took by hiding the bird will cause the courts to have a hard time

Open Document