Mr Collins Pride And Prejudice Marriage Essay

1650 Words4 Pages

Jane Austen’s critically acclaimed novel, Pride and Prejudice, is a guaranteed classic that provides excellent social commentary on the pressures of marriage for women and men alike. Right from the beginning, Austen bestows the well-renowned line, “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife”, already painting a tone of light-hearted humor and sarcasm. With an abundance of intriguing and vivid dialogue that immerses the reader into a soap opera, she delves right into the social fabric of the early 19th century; a patriarchal society where women must aspire to attain the richest of husbands to lead a healthy life. The whole gamut of marriages are present in Austen’s novel, …show more content…

Bennet, aims to find each of her lovely daughters a husband so that they can be truly sublime. One instance of marriage playing a pivotal role in the Bennet household, among all others, is that if they do not marry before their father dies, a pompous clergyman named Mr. Collins would be entailed to the Bennet estate. Filled with subtle irony, Mr. Collins’s proposal provides commentary on the absurdities of valuing convenience and wealth over true love and connection. Centering his argument around chance and a hierarchy of marriage, Joel Weinsheimer describes the irrational fear that women have over the “marriage lottery”, as women seem to have no control over their own financial status. In regards to Mr. Collins, Miss DeBourgh expresses that a clergyman like him must “find a woman as soon as he can”, and even further describes that she must be “active, useful sort of person, not brought up high” (Austen); reinstating the idea that was brought up from the first page of the novel. Of course, Austen denounces such reasoning for marriages, and it is shown through Elizabeth’s disagreement with Mr. Collins. Weinsheimer states, “The entail typifies the financial insecurity of the middle-class woman, which participation in the marriage lottery is intended to remedy” (Weinsheimer). Elizabeth’s individuality, Weinsheimer concludes, is a coping device that women must maintain in order to avoid the “threatening” powers of chance. According to Weinsheimer, choices play a pivotal role in who people marry and how people marry, as shown with Elizabeth’s disapproval to Mr. Collins, and her gradual endearment for Mr. Darcy. The reader is well aware that Elizabeth had no desire whatsoever in listening to Mr. Collins, and previously had struck down the idea of marriage based on social or economic status, as it was her choice of turning down such a beneficial offer. His proposal clearly portrays his self-absorption, arrogance,

Open Document