The set-point and positive-incentive are two theories of hunger and eating. The set-point theory is a view of hunger where people assume that hunger is the result of an energy deficit in their bodies and eating is a way to fix the energy deficit (Pinel, 2014). The set point theory seems to be the most believed theory of hunger, although evidence does not support that the theory is correct. The set-point theory believes that we have an internal control that has a set-point where our body tells us that we need to eat or we need to stop eating (Pinel, 2014). According to Pinel (2014), the set-point works in a similar manner as a thermostat does in a heating or cooling system, where the system hits a specific temperature and then shuts down until
Portion control is psychologically proven to lessen or limit an individual’s intake of any food. According to Dr. Katherine Appleton (2014), any given amount of food over the recommended serving size will be finished by an individual because it is considered normal to finish a plate for a meal. If the amount of food were to be changed, the amount of intake would change as well. This psychology study is based off of an individual’s perception on what is considered “a normal serving size” (Appleton, 2014). Portion control requires self discipline, but if Pam were to regulate her serving sizes, she could greatly decrease her caloric
...ger. It trains their mind into thinking that food is just an optional thing and not a necessity. In reality this “self discipline” is truly damaging the body and putting the body at risk later in life.
The basic idea behind this is eat when you’re hungry and stop when you’re satisfied. Seems easy right? Well for those of us who have struggled with our relationship to food it’s not. Typically we lose touch with what it truly feels like to be hungry or satisfied because we are eating for every reason other than physical
The Food Research and Action Center (FRAC) (2012) stated that “obesity plagues low-income people in this country just as hunger and food insecurity do” (para. 4). Due to predetermined budgets and the proliferating cost of food, individuals will sporadically condense their intake or omit meals to extend their food budget. This manner or pattern of consuming food triggers people to overindulge when sustenance does become obtainable, resulting in habitual ups and downs in food consumption that prom...
Ward, Christie L. Compulsive Eating: The Struggle to Feed the Hunger Inside. The Rosen Publishing Group, Inc., New York, NY. 1998.
Ziauddeen and Fletcher in this article discuss the concept of food addiction from a clinical and neuroscientific perspective. They argue that the evidence in food addiction is limited and that further research must be done in order to fully validate the concept. Despite the uncertainty, food addiction has influenced the neurobiological models of obesity and developing debates about formulation of the public health policy. Ziauddeen and Fletch also debate that because there are so many possibly pathways leading to obesity, it is unlikely that food addiction is the most effective cause. Even with their caution, they also propose there are many arguments saying many aspects of eating in obesity are “addictive.”
The author believes that goals and desires require an individual to be motivated to move from one state of being to the next. This motivation encompasses the emotional, cognitive, social, and biological drives that trigger behavior (Maslow, 1943). Accordingly, the word motivation befalls the frequently used description of why an individual achieves a goal, and the term motivation originates from the Latin root movere, which means “to move.” Therefore, motivation stands as the state that “moves” an individual to act in a particular way. For instance, when one is lying on the beach on a warm summer day and begins to feel hot, the physical need to cool down might cause one to stand up, go to the water for a dip. If the heat remains too over-bearing,
hungry we buy fast food or eat anything in front of us and move on. If we feel we need to lose
The theory of goal setting was developed by Edward Locke and Gary Latham (1990) and states that there is a direct relationship between the setting of specific high goals and task performance. A higher degree of employee performance is obtained when specific goals are set compared to the performance achieved when employees are simply told to do their best (Latham & Locke, 2007). These findings have helped shape leadership styles and improve employee performance and job satisfaction (Posthuma & Al-Riyami, 2012).
Eating has taken its toll on people who live in the United States. One of the largest problems that people have is deciding how much to eat and what is healthy to eat. It was determined in the 1930s-1940s that the brain has a tremendous impact in controlling our eating habits. The main part of the brain, which controls this, is the hypothalamus. Basically, the hypothalamus measures different levels through out the body, especially in the stomach, to determine if our body needs food, which causes the sensation of hunger.
Theories of Motivation What is the motivation for this? According to the text, motivation is defined as a set of factors that activate, direct, and maintain behavior, usually toward a certain goal. Motivation is the energy that makes us do things; this is a result of our individual needs being satisfied so that we have inspiration to complete the mission. These needs vary from person to person as everybody has their individual needs to motivate themselves.
With a fuller and clearer picture of the bodily systems, and how they respond to food, we see that overeating and obesity is not only about self-control; it has turned into a complex physiological problem. There is a cycle: a cue triggers a dopamine fueled urge. The dopamine then leads us to eat more food. Eating food leads to the release of opioid, and the production of dopamine and opioids both stimulate further eating. “Cues ensure that we will work hard to obtain the reward” (Kessler, 2009, p.54 ), but the desire for reward is causing overeating and obesity problems.
According to Greenberg (1999) motivation is defined "as a process of arousing, directing and maintaining behaviour towards a goal." Where directing' refers to the selection of a particular behaviour; and maintenance' refers to the inclination to behave with consistency in that manner until the desired outcome is met.
Appetite is very fundamental and is found in the souls of both humans and animals. What separates a human soul from that of an animal is the second part of the soul, reason. When an animal hungers, it doesn’t care what it eats so long as it’s edible. However “the appetite for something of a certain sort depends on additions” (Book IV, 437e), where such “additions” relate to the reasonable part of the soul. Reason allows man to think critically and rationally. Instead of hungering for good in general, we can hunger for Kraft Mac N Cheese or ice cream. Furthermore, the second part of the soul is rational when the appetitive part of the soul is not. For example, if I am thirsty, and there is a liter of soda in front of
According to Gopaldas(2006) there are two types of hunger. The first of them might be explained as general necessity in food consumption. The another name is self-reported hunger, whereby people estimate their craving to consume food. While the second one happens when human body requires more nutrition which they need to take. Biostatis (Krishnaraj, 2006) is a state in which people always consume less than their needed, as a result their bodies adapt to eating less food.