Moral Hybridity

1776 Words4 Pages

Arundhati Roy’s novel, titled The God of Small Things, can be deemed as what Roy would describe as a “great story,” one in which does not “deceive you with thrills and trick endings,” where “you know how they end, yet you listen as though they don’t”(Roy 218). Though this definition of a “great story” is true, it fails to include that every “great story” should feature a learning opportunity for the reader. In The God of Small Things, the trauma of Sophie Mol’s death is hinted at throughout the novel, and finally introduced at the end. It can be seen, by examining Elizabeth Outka’s article titled Trauma and Temporal Hybridity in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things and Sarah Winter’s article titled Disembodied Liberalism, Embodied Human Rights, that Roy structures her novel in a way that educates the audience on the effects of trauma by recreating the memories that Estha and Rahel possess and placing them into the book. By describing the memories in the way that the twins remember the event, Roy invites the reader to experience the trauma of Sophie Mol’s death as though they were living through the trauma. …show more content…

Outka’s belief of temporal hybridity combined with Winter’s idea of embodied perception supports Roy’s decision to structure her novel as if the reader were suffering from the effects of Sophie Mol’s death along with Estha and Rahel, which leads to the assembling of a “great

Open Document