Moon Landing False

579 Words2 Pages

Moon landing is true or false

The July 20, 1969, Neil Armstrong became the first man on the moon. That moment, culminating years of competition between the US and the USSR to be the first to access and, where possible, control space, is one of the most famous in history and popular culture, to be broadcast live on television worldwide. Apollo XI mission fired the imagination of children then grow up to become scientists and engineers, and its success gave new impetus to exploration of the solar system, although such an achievement would not be repeated again.
The 45th anniversary of the landing of the Eagle lunar module on the moon's surface was held recently, and that time has come to bring up something that persists after all these years; …show more content…

Three legs of all conspiracy theories about the Apollo XI are always the same; the lack of stars in images taken on the surface of the Moon, the fact that the installed there by astronauts flag seems to move and no crater was formed under the lander when it landed, something that should have happened to use your engine to ensure the landing. All of them, and some more, dismounted in the first program of 'skeptics', ETB series, presented after Luis Alfonso Gámez, who refuted many of pseudoscience and deceptions masquerading as science and irrefutable facts in today's society.
The first one, he released the book 'We Never Went to the Moon', 1974 'on it in photos taken on the surface of the moon the stars are indistinguishable, explained by the same reason that no They are when we take pictures at night on Earth, and no, that our satellite has no atmosphere has nothing to do. On the Moon, its surface reflects the light reaching it from the Sun, which is in cameras the same effect as a flash; only you see what is in the foreground. The stars in the background, have a brightness too weak for us to see them in pictures. With respect to the flag, the astronauts deployed through a rail, but in none of the available videos flown shows.These theories, the fact that the engines of the lunar module did not create a crater under the ship to go down, rests on the fact that the engine had a thrust of 5,500 kg. Obviously, at full power, he would have left a great hole in the Sea of Tranquility, but to stop the vehicle and allow the moon landing was not necessary; It had only to generate a thrust of 1,500 kg., enough to raise some dust and little

Open Document