Moon Landing Conspiracy

747 Words2 Pages

Moon Landing Around the early 1970’s, Neil Armstrong became the first human being to make it to the moon and back safely, or did he? Ever since then, conspiracy theorist have been studying this one question, “Was the moon landing real, or faked?”. No one knows for sure, and frankly very few care, but did the United States really land on the moon, or was it all played out?

I personally believe that the US landed on the moon. I will prove my point throughout this essay by providing evidence, such as proving the facts that don’t support my claim to be wrong, and the facts that support my side to be correct. So those of you on my side here’s some evidence to help you out. Those of you not, keep on reading and you’ll see what I …show more content…

One of the strongest pieces of evidence is that the Soviet Union, who was racing us to the moon, couldn’t prove the moon landing was fake themselves! I’m sure they would’ve came up with evidence that it was all faked way before we did, but they didn’t, though for some reason, we did? If the moon landing was faked, why were we the first ones to bring it up, and not our own enemies?

The next strong piece of evidence is that if you look at modern pictures of the moon, you’ll see lunar buggy tracks that were left by the landing. You may be asking, “Wouldn’t the tracks be gone, or blown away by now?”. My argument is that there is no wind on the moon, right? So how would the tracks get blown away? I guess the United States could have edited the picture, but in that case, more people would’ve argued the fact with the new high-definition telescopes. Therefore, at least a lunar buggy landed on the moon!

Also, astronauts found parts from surveyor, a test ship that crashed directly into the moon, and brought back three parts. I know that I would believe something if there was proof like that! I’m also pretty sure that NASA would know what parts there were, and could prove it by the

More about Moon Landing Conspiracy

Open Document