Monsters And Messiahs

925 Words2 Pages

Common sense seems to dictate that people seem to hide from reality in their own monsters that they make. People prefer to watch made up monsters. In their imagination, they find a way to defeat their made-up personality, they to get overwhelm on life problems and monster that they can’t fight.
In this essay, I will be critiquing two articles “Monsters and Messiahs” by Mike Davis and “My Zombie, Myself: why Modern Life Feels Rather Undead” by Chuck Klosterman, to show the different fallacies along with the argumentized style that is being used. Both of this articles can be found in the book Monster A Bedford Spotlight Reader by Andrew J. Hoffman. Monsters and Messiahs is an article by Mike Davis. This author start off by a quick introduction of his topic. In this case, he tries to analysis people fascination with the monster the chupacabra which he then translates that monsters name in English meaning goat sucker, blood sucker that is. The author gives at first a quick overview of the original of where the first appearance and location. I believe that this is an Toulmin argument because it is relying on chupacabra being the main character of …show more content…

It has a lot of examples that it used like “The principal downside to any zombie attack is that the zombies will never stop coming the principal downside to life is that you will never be finished with whatever it is you do” (pg.41). This can be tight to the current times because we as people never stop, we are always afraid of getting behind, that we have become like zombies or running from zombies. This author also points out are fascination with zombies a growing fad that has people preparing and imagination what their reactions would be in a situation like what people believe will one day happen. He compares other movies that are related to the poplar series “The Walking Dead”

Open Document