Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In any village, empire, city, or country, there is a unique culture. A culture that, to those people, is ‘normal’. The word ‘normal,’ nowadays, can be interpreted in so many different ways. The same goes for back then. To any place that had their ‘normal’ culture and traditions, anything that was against their beliefs was though off to be as ‘barbaric’. Barbaric is a term that is used when something or someone is primitive or unsophisticated. The Mongols were illiterate people who swept across much of Asia, the Middle East, and Western Europe. They were seen and known as barbarians. Because they were illiterate, very few records were found of them. The Mongols took over in what we call, ‘waves.’ The first wave was in Northern China and Ancient …show more content…
In the conquests they left horrifying scenes and this was no humane act. They left their subjects lying there in positions that just showed how cruel the Mongols were (Doc. F). The image shows men killing a prisoner. Their faces show nothing. No emotion, no regret, no guilt. ‘The Shah Namah’ shows the way they were as people. It shows their culture and beliefs. To the Mongols, people were just things to conquer and kill. In Russia, Kozelsk (1237), there were no survivors of the attack (Doc. E). The Mongols killed all inhabitants and left nothing. They slaughtered all soldiers, women and children. They were ruthless. The Mongols showed their barbaric being through how many people they killed and how they left …show more content…
At the age of fifteen, men were expected to undertake a military duty (Doc. B). This means that at the age of fifteen, they were expected to kill. They were expected to become savages. Loyalty to the military was something that the Mongols army took seriously. If you were to run away, your army group was to be put to death (Doc. C). The rule of loyalty was, you fight together. You stand together. In a way this was less barbaric coming from the Mongols. They basically say that this is a team and those who betray their team, are taken out. They used this loyalty in battle. These tactics allowed them to be more united and this unity made them stronger. The Mongols came to conquer many areas and populations. In a period of 1162-1227, Genghis Khan was able to conquer about 4,860,000 square miles (Doc. A). He ranked #1 beating Alexander the Great and Tamerlane for most square miles conquered. This means that all the people who lived in those 4,860,000 square miles were killed by the Mongols. They created a war zone. The only way that they were able to conquer so much area, was because of there battling strategies (Doc. D). They used what they knew to work together and fight for the land. The Mongols were a powerful
The people that the Mongol Empire overthrew were the only ones to suffer under Genghis Khan’s homicidal ways. Khan’s army was forcibly traumatized under maniacal methods as well: “Genghis Khan ordained that the army should be organized in such a way that over ten men should beset one man and he is what we call a captain of ten. [...] When they are in battle, if one or two or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death; and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of a hundred are all put to death, if they do not flee too. [...] Likewise if one or two or more go forward boldly to the fight, then the rest of the ten are put to death if they do not follow and, if one or more of the ten are captured, their companions are put to death if they do not rescue them.” (doc B) Every group of ten was expected to perform at a homog...
When attacking cities, the mongols often had their prisoners go first, creating a bigger target for them. Also, prisoners were often put to work where they received bone breaking work and brutal beatings. In many cases, the mongols would often bury their prisoners alive head first, or shoot and kill them with a bow and arrow from extremely close range. Sometimes, they would use these punishment as warnings for rivalry tribes, showing them the this is what we do. In the end, they mongols were extremely barbaric with the punishments their prisoners received.
Despite the fact that Mongolians were prejudiced against other cultures, they were, in fact, not barbaric but rather civilized because of their gender equality of people and how advanced their cities were. In The Book of Ser Marco Polo, Polo tells us how beautiful and well protected the city was like. For instance, the text explains how the city was protected by two great powerful walls surrounding the entire city. Only well advanced and civilized people can do such a thing such as creating an enormous wall. If the Mongolians were barbaric they wouldn’t have even thought of protection.. In Addition, the way the city looked also proved that they were civilized and not barbaric.
Rossabi, Morris. "Life in China Under Mongol Rule: Religion." The Mongols in World History | Asia
The Mongol empire was the largest land empire the world has ever seen. First began as a nomadic group of tribes. Mongols were united and emerged into an empire that conquered lands stretching from Europe to Central Asia under the rule of Genghis Khan. The Mongol empire was able to succeed in expanding, and conquering was due to their ability to adapt to any living conditions, their sheer brutality force, and their strong military organization. To begin, one factor that supported the Mongols in their conquests was their capacity for foraging, allowing them to survive under harsh living conditions.
Compare these Mongol laws to current times in America or Europe. People are worried at night because of safety and not only lock their houses but get extensive security systems and other protections against people doing them harm. If we, in the United States or in Europe, are not barbaric yet do not feel the same kind of safety as the Mongol people felt, how are the Mongols barbaric. Along with these strict laws, the Mongols also showed strict morals with respect for each other, not get drunk often; but the Mongols were still very socially open to and enjoyed drinking in consideration. These morals have been around since Jesus’ time and He used them in his teachings, so if Jesus preached these morals and he the most perfect man accept them, how can the Mongols be seen as barbaric? Another thing that the Mongols did that showed their intelligence and civilizedness is their extensive post stations. These stations held fresh horses used for messengers to help them reach their destination much quicker. These stations were placed strategically along the road usually 25 miles
When the word “Mongol” is said I automatically think negative thoughts about uncultured, barbaric people who are horribly cruel and violent. That is only because I have only heard the word used to describe such a person. I have never really registered any initial information I have been taught about the subject pass the point of needing and having to know it. I felt quite incompetent on the subject and once I was given an assignment on the book, Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern Age, I was very perplexed for two reasons. One I have to read an outside book for a class that already requires a substantial amount of time reading the text, and secondly I have to write a research paper in History. I got over it and read the book, which surprisingly enough interested me a great deal and allow me to see the Moguls for more than just a barbaric group of Neanderthals, but rather a group of purpose driven warriors with a common goal of unity and progression. Jack Weatherford’s work has given me insight on and swayed my opinion of the Mongols.
When Westerners such as ourselves and people native to Europe are asked what they know of the Mongols the answer is usually ruthless barbarians intent upon world domination. After all these years you would expect that the educational points presented to the different generations in school would have given a different view of the Mongol civilization. Leaving this vision instilled upon generation after generation is detrimental to learning the different positive aspects left behind by such a powerful empire. The nomadic lifestyle that the Mongols endured empowered them to become hardy warriors. The Mongols began their conquests in response to Ghengis Khans personal missions as well as a disruption in trade and the ecology of the land upon which they inhabited.
The Mongol Empire was a very powerful which conquered more land in two years than the Romans did in 400 years. Also, they controlled more than eleven million square miles. The Mongols were very important because they created nations like Russia and Korea, smashed the feudal system and created international law, and created the first free trade zone. In the beginning of the Mongol Empire, they mostly lived in foothills bordering the Siberian forests mixing heroing and hunting. They also became really good at archery and riding horses. The main reason the Mongols came to be so powerful was all because of a man named Genghis Kahn. Genghis was born around 1162 with the name Temujin. Due to the death of his father, Temujin was left under the control of his older brothers. Soon enough, he was married to a woman named Borte. Borte was later kidnapped, in which Temujin proved his military skills when saving her. Not to long after this, Temujin became the leader of his tribe. Yet, to unite the Mongol confederations it required a civil war, which Temijun ended up winning. After proving his skills and loyalty, Temijun was declared the Gr...
When we compare Genghis Khan to other military strategist who were also known by their ruthlessness we see that they were no match for his gruesome tactics and unmerciful reign. We see that compared to Alexander The Great, or Adolf Hitler Genghis khan conquered three times more in square miles (Doc A). He killed over 3 million people varying from Bukhara,Merv, NIshapur, Herat, and Baghdad (Doc E). As we can see he used his military supremacy against them often people saying that his conquest were so bloody and gruesome they led to the slaughter of thousands at time causing the street to skink of human grease and flesh (Intro
... were positive, one may argue that these individuals only saw the tolerant and fair-minded side of the Mongols, and not the relentless warrior part of the society who was known for its “dirty” tactics of war, which went as far as launching diseased-ridden corpses over the walls of castles during sieges. Alternatively, one may argue that the scholars who provided negative documentation of the Mongols only saw the destructive side, not the open-minded side of the society who were known for their cultural acceptance. Although these accounts allowed for an adequate idea of the nature of the Mongols, a record from a peasant who was not a member of the upper class in their society, as all reports presented were from historians, scholars, and political leaders. This would allow for a different perspective on the issue and would produce a better understanding of the topic.
The Mongols could be considered barbarians because of the violent and barbaric war tactics they used to instill fear in people. They often took advantage of their organized army to carry out many of these military tactics. When the Mongols attacked places such as fortresses, they would first surround it, breaking up their army into groups and periodically switched them so that they could attack day and night while the fortresses inhabitants tired themselves out trying to protect themselves (Doc 3). When they were not able to capture the fortress like this, they would take the fat of enemies they killed, and, after melting it, they would catapult it onto houses and set fire to it; these fires were nearly impossible to put out (Doc 3). The Mongols would also often take over entire cities, slaying all its inhabitants and burning it to the ground after taking any valuables. ...
The Mongols believed a conquered city should be able to be plowed upon; and that not even cats and dogs should be left alive (DOC E). Once the Mongols conquered new land, with the exception of those they wished to have as slaves or artisans who could contribute to society, they murdered with an axe (DOC D). Their killing was so severe, sometimes, the Mongols ended up killing whole cities, most histories estimate the number they killed to be in the millions (Green). By being this ruthless, the societies around the Mongols would hear of the Mongols treatment of prisons and often surrendered the second the Mongols arrived, just to escape slaughter (Green). Being ruthless also meant the Mongol army had nothing stopping them from doing exactly what they wanted because they didn’t care at all about sacrificing enemy casualties and huge groups of people dying.
The Mongol Empire couldn’t have existed without the unity Chinggis Khan provided. The pastoralists began as simply distinct tribes, but with the help of Chinggis Khan they united under the goal of conquering the world. They first extracted their wealth from raiding, trading, and extorting other nations, but once they had to built a strong enough army they started their attacks. The Mongols advantage of horseback riding gave them the power needed to take down strong nations including China, Persia, and Russia. The Mongols led the unification of Eurasia creating an empire that’s success and domination had been unprecedented.The massive Mongol empire rose from the ashes of many distinct nations as they conquered these nations through their clever
They struck fear into their enemies eyes with their gruesome affect and fierce actions. They showed no mercy. The Mongols were also known for their surprise attack which spread to other armies making it a keen warfare used all around the world. This battle tactic consisted of a group of men who are fighting out on the battlefield and they begin to retreat only to draw the enemy into a trap. The enemy runs into a rain of arrows as the rest of the men are hiding off to the side with loaded weapons, and fierce ground fighters ready for combat. This is one key that the Mongols had to help them conquer