Modest Proposal Satire

1290 Words3 Pages

Title Satire is an effective way to offer social criticism and influence people-- it uses techniques such as irony, parody, sarcasm, and exaggeration to allow readers to look at serious issues from a comedic view. In “A Modest Proposal”, Jonathan Swift responds to the growing famine in Ireland and overpopulation issues of the eighteenth century by proposing that Ireland can solve the economic crisis by eating babies and selling children. Rather than writing an angry article about how the British exploit poor, defenseless Irishmen, Jonathan Swift took on a different approach and wrote a satire. His goal wasn’t merely to ridicule and express his dissatisfaction with how the Irish was handling the social and political problems, but also to open …show more content…

Through the satirical technique of providing solutions so outrageously absurd and immoral, Swift creates waves of shocks that draws upon more awareness from the audience, as well as provokes the readers to think twice while they are reading the proposal so that his ideas would stick in their minds. One of the dominant satirical elements that can be found in “A Modest Proposal” is irony, in which the literal meaning of the what is written is the opposite of what the author really intends to convey. To mock and criticize the unsuccessful attempts of the British to solve the economic problems, Swift uses verbal irony and compares the British as landlords that ate the parents of the children (the poor Irishmen) without directly mentioning their names. “I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and therefore very proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children” (Swift, pg. 3). While it seems that Swift is …show more content…

For instance, Swift presents that one of the advantages of this proposal would be that women would care more for their children because children would provide “annual profit instead of expense” (Swift, pg. 5). Yet in reality, Irish women had to abort or kill their children because they couldn’t afford the expense of raising a kid. A second advantage of the proposal would be that “poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own….which [could] help to pay their landlord’s rent, their corn and cattle being already seized, and money a thing unknown” (Swift, pg. 4). While Swift seems to make the advantages seem beneficial to the poor, the bitter truth was that the upper class that “justly value themselves upon their knowledge in good eating” (Swift, pg. 5) take away resources from the poor and spend large amounts of money on meals rather than focusing on the famine spreading across

Open Document