Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Manifest destiny westward expansion introduction and conclusion
Manifest destiny and westward expansion essay
Impact of westward expansion and manifest destiny of united states
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The problems between the North and South go way back when in 1787. What causes these problems to intensify is the manifest destiny. Manifest destiny is the belief to expand westward. The agreements and compromises that are made to keep these two parties together is the Missouri compromise in 1820, the compromise of 1850, and the kansas nebraska act. The successfulness of these compromises kept on for forty long years. The sudden need for the Missouri compromise in 1820 was because Missouri became a state and wanted to be a slave state. This threw off the 11 to 11 ratio. The free states that existed before the Missouri compromise was New Jersey, illinois, rhode island, indiana,ohio, new york, vermont, new hampshire pennsylvania, massachusetts, and connecticut. The slave states before the Missouri compromise was delaware, mississippi, georgia, virginia, alabama, maryland, kentucky, South Carolina, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Louisiana. The new free state that solve everything was Maine. The new slave that was admitted to the us by the Missouri compromise was Missouri. The Missouri compromise also brought another thing with it. It brought the Missouri compromise line. This line was located at 36° 30´ . anything above this line …show more content…
The new free states that entered the Union between 1821-1848 was michigan, iowa, and wisconsin. The slave states that entered the Union between 1821-1848 was arkansas, texas, and florida. There were three parts of the compromise of 1850. The first part was letting california enter the Union. Part two was entering the Utah and New Mexico territories into the Union. Part three of the compromise was to end the slave trade in Washington DC and a new strict law for fugitive slaves. In Washington DC you could not purchase slaves or trade but you can still own them. This works well until something happens to america in the
During the 19th century, America had an expanding idea of Manifest Destiny, where they would claim land all the way to the east coast. While the government and the citizens were focused on exploring new land, they were able to acquire much of the new land, introducing new people and ideas. Many of these people and ideas were vastly different than the original in the thirteen colonies, which frustrated many people. When these different people and beliefs collided, many disputes and disagreements were born, which intensified the results of sectionalism, unfortunately leading up the Civil War, having a huge impact on the country.
The North always looked at the South with antipathy and kept trying to abolish slavery, but the South didn’t like the North interfering and wanted to continue the use of slavery. The Missouri compromise was another issue between the North and the South. Missouri was a territory state, and it opted to be in the Union in 1818. There was a proposal to ban Slavery in Missouri, even though there were more than 2000 slaves living there, in desperation, Missouri asked for help from the South. Maine was another territory that had petitioned to enter the union, so in 1820 a compromise was set and Missouri was allowed to stay a slave state, and Maine was declared a free state.
Thomas Jefferson, in response to the Missouri Compromise, expressed, “ I considered it at once as the knell of the Union. It is hushed indeed for the moment, but this is a reprieve only, not a final sentence… and every new irritation will mark it deeper and deeper” (Meacham 475). Jefferson explained how the Missouri Compromise led to the sectionalism between the North and South, which caused the Civil War. Western expansion and the Louisiana Purchase both led to the formation of the Missouri Compromise as more states started applying for statehood, which disrupted the balance between the slave and free states. Additionally, the division between the North and South increased rapidly because of the Missouri Compromise. It created a line that
In 1819, Missouri wanted to join the Union, although in the North, as a slave state. In would make the balance of power in the Congress unequal.
During the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries the United States saw many problems come and go. Some problems were more important than others, however all led to further division of American politics. The most divisive issue in American politics during this time frame was the idea of Manifest Destiny, or territorial expansion.
Before the mid 1800s, the north and south dealt with a lot of disagreements that involved economic differences. The differences dealt with slavery, representation, states’ rights, and tariffs. There was a conflict with states wanting to balance the freedom of slaves in the states. Another cause was the tariffs which dealt with the taxation of imported goods, the Northern states supported protective tariffs, but the South did not. Consequently, the conflicts began to grow and this increased the differences between the North and South. During the early to mid 1800s sectional differences forced the north and south farther and farther apart. The differences that affected the North and South involved the missouri compromise of 1820, the cotton gin invention, and the Uncle Tom’s novel.
The Civil War, a devastating conflict amongst the American North and South in the mid to late 1800s, was caused by growing tension between the opposing sides for many reasons but also because of territorial expansion of America. In determining the impact of territorial expansion in the mid 1800’s on the sectionalism that led to the civil war, one would first have to look at the tactics for territorial expansion in America. Americans began to entertain the idea of heading west in the early 1800’s, which then brought forth the acts and events of the United States spreading its boundaries from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Historical events involving the expansion of America such as Manifest Destiny, the War with Mexico, and popular sovereignty in the west, all contributed to the growing tension between the North and the South, ultimately starting the Civil War. In the early nineteenth century, most Northerners and Southerners agreed entirely that Americans should settle Western territories, and that it was God’s plan, or their “manifest destiny.”
In late 1849, California applied for admission as a free state in the Union. The problem with this request was the geographical dividing line that congress created in the Missouri Compromise to separate the free states in the north, and the slave states in the south. The dividing line went right through the middle of California, making congress debate whether California should be a free state or a slave state. Congressmen argued over the topic, bringing Henry Clay out of retirement to help figure out a compromise. Clay...
Another advantage of the Compromise of 1850 to the south was that the rest of the Mexican Cession territory was to be divided into the two territories of Utah, and New Mexico. It was also said that when these territories eventually applied for statehood, the people of the new states would decide for themselves if they were to be free states or slave states. This was good for the south because it made it possible for the new territory to eventually become slave states, and that would not be possible if the 36-30 line was extended westward. The compromise also said nothing prohibiting people from bringing their slaves to the territory in the meantime.
The turmoil between the North and South about slavery brought many issues to light. People from their respective regions would argue whether it was a moral institution and that no matter what, a decision on the topic had to be made that would bring the country to an agreement once and for all. This paper discusses the irrepressible conflict William H. Seward mentions, several politician’s different views on why they could or could not co-exist, and also discusses the possible war as a result.
Originally a single bill, the Compromise was composed of five parts. Firstly, California would be admitted to the Union as a free state. In exchange, the South was guaranteed that no government restrictions on slavery would be placed on the territories of New Mexico and Utah (ushistory.org). Thirdly, Texas would lose its boundary claims to New Mexico, but Congress would pay ten million dollars to Texas in compensation. Furthermore, the slave trade was to be prohibited in Washington D.C, but slavery itself would still be maintained (ushistory.org). Finally, the Fugitive Slave Act would be passed, requiring Northerners to return runaway slaves to their owners, under penalty of law (ushistory.org).
Slave and Free states could not coexist in a union. Compromise after compromise was brought to the table to avoid an oncoming collapse. Despite the work of legislators and presidents to appease both sides, Northern and Southern states remained at odds. The divisions between the two sides transcended generations. Political crises in 1787, 1820, 1832, 1850 and 1860 not only brought failed compromises, but also strained the threads holding the nation together. Solutions to the crises were only effective for a short term. At its core, the issues between North and South funneled into slavery and its role in the identity of a young nation. Its only solution would come through bloodshed.
Throughout the period of Antebellum there were many compromises made regarding slavery: The ⅗ compromise in 1787, the Missouri Compromise in 1820, the Tariff of 1833, and finally the compromise. With so many agreements made between the North and the South, why was america not able to make a compromise in 1861 when the secession crisis was happening? What happened between 1787 to 1861 causing the United States to change from a country of compromising opponents to a country of fighting enemies? The answer answer is not so simple.There are a myriad of factors which resulted in the ultimate failure of compromise, but the most important ones are as follows: The imbalance of power between the North and South made it incapable for the two sides to make a compromise that would be in the southerners own self interest, disillusionment with the nature of compromisation made neither the North nor the South want to work it out, and finally the growing divide between the two regions, along with clashing political beliefs caused an animosity between them that could not be reconciled by mere compromise.
As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood; the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state, entering the union as a free state. After this compromise, any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union.
In the years of 1830 through 1860, a breach in the unity between the North and the South of the United States occurred. They faced an