Mindfulness Intervention

1628 Words4 Pages

LITERATURE REVIEW
In schools, mindfulness interventions most commonly include meditation practices focusing on breathing and awareness of emotions. According to Follette et al. (2006), “Mindfulness practices provide a method in which people can practice experiencing thoughts and feelings that have been avoided in the past” (p. 58). These studies and interventions have mainly focused on improving students’ behavior (Felver et al., 2013; Greco et al., 2008; Lee et al. 2008; Semple et al. 2010). Students who are suffering from long-term effects of trauma are often found to act out in school, avoid work, fixate on thoughts, and show a lack of flexibility (Follette et al. 2006). These students are more likely than their peers to experience maladaptive …show more content…

Social Constructivism is the underlying philosophy of this project. According to Creswell (2013), “In social constructivism, individuals seek understanding of the world in which they live and work” (p. 24). This project will take place in my school, and I will be a participant in the training of staff and ongoing professional development and support for the staff, in addition to seeking and recording their feedback and reflections from the implementation.
Mindfulness practices will begin at the classroom level to support the trauma students and teachers may be experiencing and give them calming and refocusing tools. The program will be implemented over 8 weeks with 2 to 3 sessions per week of mindfulness training with students. Two groups of teachers and classrooms will be compared given the pilot roll-out: one group will not participate in the mindfulness training, and the participating group where the teacher will participate and/or facilitate the mindfulness …show more content…

During these observations, I will collect fieldnotes. At the end of the eight weeks, I will hold focus groups for the participating teachers. I will have questions prepared to help facilitate the conversation as needed. My plan for these focus groups is for the conversation to be more teacher directed to highlight and analyze what they find important and choose to discuss, related to the implementation in their classrooms, what they are noticing in their students, and what they are noticing in themselves and the impact on their jobs. Monique M. Hennick (as cited by Merriam & Tisdell, 2016) explains: “Perhaps the most unique characteristic of focus group research is the interactive discussion through which data are generated, which leads to a different type of data not accessible through individual interviews. During the group discussion participants share their views in light of what they have heard” (p. 114)
I will also collect any existing institutional data that can be compared to the previous year. In the Salt Lake City School District, this may include data from Educator’s Handbook, which is a discipline tracking program used. This data will not be sufficient on its own, due to varying degrees and methods of collection between each school year and the level of reporting fidelity at the teacher and school level. However, I believe this data has the potential

Open Document