Michael's Use Of Allegory

1626 Words4 Pages

The cultural context that motivated the actions of the Nazis and the people of Germany was defined by the spirit of the time, or in other words, the zeitgeist of Post World War II, which focused greatly on the vulnerability experienced by the Germans and the promise of greatness and restoration of national pride that the Nazis were offering. Schlink captures this through the use of symbolism, allegory, analogy and characterisation and allows readers to view the time period from the perspective of an adolescent German. He also gives the reader an opportunity to develop a sense of empathy for the characters and subsequently for Germans during that time, who may still carry the guilt and burden of their World-War past. The relationship between Hanna and Michael becomes an analogy for the uncertainty, guilt and confusion of this …show more content…

The novel is essentially an allegory for the guilt shouldered by the Germans. Schlink only reveals Hanna’s crimes to the reader in Part 2 which allows us to sympathise with the character more. If he were to reveal Hanna’s crimes any earlier to the reader, they may not understand her motives. Schlink is intentionally ambiguous on this point. He doesn’t condemn Hanna but there is significance in the fact that we are not given the opportunity, as readers, to hear Hanna’s voice thus we do not receive a sense of her motivation. Michael's generation blame their parents to escape any guilt: "we all condemned our parents to shame, even if the only charge we could bring was that after 1945 they had tolerated the perpetrators in their midst” (Schlink, 2008). Schlink suggests that Germans need to face the crimes of their country before they can be freed of guilt. Michael pursues a career in law which forces him to grapple with moral issues and later in the novel says, “maybe I did write our story to be free of it, even if I never can be,” (Schlink,

Open Document